1 / 10

Monitoring Prescribed fires

Louisa Evers – State/Regional Fire Ecologist. Monitoring Prescribed fires. Objectives are Hierarchical. Resource Objectives Fire Effects Objectives Fire Behavior Objectives Burning Prescription. Objectives must be:. S – specific M – measureable A – attainable R – relevant T – trackable.

Download Presentation

Monitoring Prescribed fires

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Louisa Evers – State/Regional Fire Ecologist Monitoring Prescribed fires

  2. Objectives are Hierarchical • Resource Objectives • Fire Effects Objectives • Fire Behavior Objectives • Burning Prescription

  3. Objectives must be: • S – specific • M – measureable • A – attainable • R – relevant • T – trackable

  4. Element 20 • Fuels information required and procedures • Weather monitoring required and procedures • Fire behavior monitoring required and procedures • Smoke dispersal monitoring required and procedures • Monitoring required to ensure prescribed fire objectives are met

  5. Monitoring Methods • Brown’s down woody inventory • Step counts • Photo guides • Photo points • Monitoring forms • Fuels • Weather • Behavior • Smoke

  6. Monitoring Tips • Use standard protocols – FFI, monitoring manuals • Use standardized forms • Store the data for later retrieval and analysis

  7. Reasons Monitoring Fails • Never completed • Information/data collected but not analyzed • Information/data analyzed but results inconclusive • Information/data analyzed, interesting, but never presented or used • Information/data presented but not used due to internal or external factors • Data/analyses filed but can’t be found • Data/analyses filed on media that become obsolete and not transferred

  8. Interagency Monitoring Strategy Key Features • Three intensity levels • Level 1 – GIS maps of treatment areas • Level 2 – qualitative assessment of treatment success on 10% of treatment units • Level 3 – quantitative assessment of treatment success on 1-2 projects per year • Conduct assessments before and after treatment

  9. Key Features Continued • Standard protocols and database – FFI • Minimum data standards • Monitor only what is relevant • Additional monitoring paid by other resource programs

  10. Goals of Monitoring Strategy • Alter Fire Regime Condition Class • Alter expected wildfire behavior • Alter expected wildfire effects

More Related