1 / 3

Meteor Crater Experiment (METCRAX II)

Observing and modeling downslope-windstorm-type flow in a small-scale crater induced by larger-scale katabatic winds. Meteor Crater Experiment (METCRAX II). Dave Whiteman 1 , Sebastian Hoch 1 , Ron Calhoun 2 and Rich Rotunno 3. 1 University of Utah, 2 Arizona State University, and 3 NCAR.

Download Presentation

Meteor Crater Experiment (METCRAX II)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Observing and modeling downslope-windstorm-type flow in a small-scale crater induced by larger-scale katabatic winds Meteor Crater Experiment (METCRAX II) Dave Whiteman1, Sebastian Hoch1, Ron Calhoun2 and Rich Rotunno3 1University of Utah, 2Arizona State University, and 3NCAR Background: A serendipitous discovery in a prior NSF-funded research program identified Arizona’s Meteor Crater as being ideally suited for studying Downslope-Windstorm-Type Flows (DWF), which develop there intermittently during fair weather when mesoscale nighttime drainage flows periodically cascade over the crater’s southwest rim. Many DWF replications occur naturally under these conditions in apparent response to changes in the structure of the approaching flow. • Project goals: • Investigate the basic mechanisms leading to the evolution of downslope-windstorm-type flows • Observe DWFs in Arizona’s Meteor Crater, a natural laboratory for these flows • Through analysis and numerical model simulations, extend DWF knowledge to other topographic and meteorological situations

  2. Research Questions Can existing mesoscale models produce accurate simulations of the DWF evolution at Meteor Crater and for other idealized basins and ridges of different size and shape? Will model parametric studies be successful in defining the parameter space and leading to improved understanding that will provide practical benefits for forecasting of downslope windstorms? What is the 3-D structure of DWFs that develop behind the circular ridge of Meteor Crater? How do these 3-D flows evolve? What intermediate changes in flow structure occur as the approach flow changes? What are their characteristics and climatology? How does the crater atmosphere respond to warm air intrusions associated with the DWF? What role does the downstream stability inside the crater play in determining the penetration depth? Which of the existing theories on DWFs is responsible for DWFs at Meteor Crater? What are the controlling upstream parameters (e.g., inversion depth and stability, wind speed and vertical shear) that cause the DWF to develop? How does blocked flow upwind of the crater rim modify the inflow? How much fluid is drawn from the upwind blocked layer as the flow goes over the rim? What meteorological mechanism produces pulses in the approach flow that tip the fluid structure into a full-fledged downslope-wind-type flow? John Shelton photo

  3. Methods: The research will combine a 1-month observational program, centered on the use of three state-of-the-art scanning Doppler LiDARS, with numerical modeling of real-cases and an idealized parametric modeling study. Topography and equipment locations Conceptual model based on our previous research. Streamlines, isentropes, wind and temperature profiles. Measurements to be made on a SW-NE line through the crater

More Related