1 / 12

Who you can be in age of empires 3 and some about them

Who you can be in age of empires 3 and some about them. By: Alex and Nathan. Napoleon Bonaparte. 21 July, 1798 Trudging towards Cairo, Napoleon Bonaparte and 25,000 men battled two forces of Egypt (21,000 men) and Ibrahim Bey (100,000).

caitir
Download Presentation

Who you can be in age of empires 3 and some about them

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Who you can be in age of empires 3 and some about them By: Alex and Nathan

  2. Napoleon Bonaparte 21 July, 1798 Trudging towards Cairo, Napoleon Bonaparte and 25,000 men battled two forces of Egypt (21,000 men) and Ibrahim Bey (100,000). The native forces were split by the Nile, with Murad entrenched in a village called Embabeh and Ibrahim in the open. The massive force of irregulars (very weak people) under Ibrahim watched the battle's progress and then seeing the situation melted away. Murad's force - including 40 cannon and 6000 crack Egypt horsemen - took on Bonaparte, who was forced on to the defensive by the threat from the riders. The French formed themselves into squares covered by 30 guns and determinedly beat off sustained attacks by the Egypt . The Egyptian defenders in the village were isolated and a brutal assault resulted in them being routed. More than 5000 of the Egypt force were killed or wounded, while Bonaparte's Army of the Orient lost 300 men. The Pyramids won Lower Egypt for France, but Admiral Horatio Nelson's victory on the Nile

  3. still • One of the best people in history, Napoleon Bonaparte was a great soldier, and a super administrator. He was also really tiereles, a dictator and, later in his life, thought he could do no wrong!

  4. Ivan the Terrible • Ivan IV, know as Ivan the Terrible, is most known for his brutal ruling, centralised • Ruling of Russia and expantion of the boundaries of the Russian city. He was born in Moscow Russia on August 25, 1530, the oldest son of Vasilij III.

  5. Maurice of orange • (born Nov. 13, 1567, Dillenburg, Nassau — died April 23, 1625, The Hague) Dutch general and statesman. The son of William I (he was invested in 1585 as stadtholder (chief executive) of the northern provinces of the Netherlands. With political direction from Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, Maurice consolidated the power of the provinces against Spain and made them trade and shipping centres. He used military planning and siege warfare to defeat Spanish forces in the north and east but failed to take the southern Netherlands and was forced to conclude a truce with Spain in 1609. His development of military strategy and tactics made the Dutch army the most modern in Europe. In 1618 he consolidated his political power after removing Oldenbarnevelt from office, and as prince of Orange, count of Nassau, he became great king

  6. Tokugawa shogunate • Tokugawa, also known as the Tokugawa bakufu (徳川幕府?) and the Edo bakufu (江戸幕府?), was a feudal regime of Japan established by Tokugawa Ieyasu and ruled by the shoguns of the Tokugawa family. This period is known as the Edo period and gets its name from the capital city, Edo, which now is called Tokyo. The Tokugawa shogunate ruled from Edo Castle from 1603 until 1868, when it was abolished during the Meiji Restoration. • The Tokugawa period, unlike the shogunates before it, was supposedly based on the strict class hierarchy originally established by Toyotomi Hideyoshi. The warrior-caste of samurai were at the top, followed by farmers, artisans, and traders. The inflexible nature of the Social stratification system unleashed disruptive forces over time. Taxes on the peasantry were set at fixed amounts which did not account for inflation or other changes in monetary value. As a result, the tax revenues collected by the samurai landowners were worth less and less over time. This often led to #’s confrontations between noble but impoverished samurai and well-to-do peasants, ranging from simple local disturbances to much bigger rebellions. None, however, proved compelling enough to seriously challenge the established order until the arrival of foreign powers. • Toward the end of the 19th century, an alliance of several of the more powerful daimyo with the titular Emperor finally succeeded in the overthrow of the shogunate after the Boshin War, culminating in the Meiji Restoration. The Tokugawa Shogunate came to an official end in 1868, with the resignation of the 15th Tokugawa Shogun, Tokugawa Yoshinobu and the "restoration" of imperial rule.

  7. suleiman the magnificent • (Ottoman Turkish: Sulaymān, Modern Turkish: Süleyman; almost always Kanuni Sultan Süleyman; 6 November 1494, from 1520 to his death in 1566. He is known in the West as Suleiman the Magnificent[1] and in the East, as the Lawmaker for his complete reconstruction of the Ottoman legal system. Suleiman became a prominent monarch of 16th century Europe, presiding over the apex of the Ottoman Empire's military, political and economic power. Suleiman personally led Ottoman armies to conquer the Christian strongholds of Belgrade, Rhodes, and most of Hungary before his conquests were checked at the Siege of Vienna in 1529. He annexed most of the Middle East in his conflict with the Persians and large swathes of North Africa as far west as Algeria. Under his rule, the Ottoman fleet dominated the seas from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.[2]

  8. Fredrick the great •      “A crown is merely a hat that lets the rain in.”  Frederick The Great quote •  Add to Chapter... •      “The greatest and noblest pleasure which men can have in this world is to discover new truths; and the next is to shake off old prejudices.”  Frederick The Great quote • Similar Quotes. About: Truth quotes, Prejudice quotes, Pleasure quotes.  Add to Chapter... •      “A man who seeks truth and loves it must be reckoned precious to any human society”  Frederick The Great quote • About: Men quotes.  Add to Chapter... •      “He who defends everything defends nothing.”  Frederick The Great quote •  Add to Chapter... •      “The truth is always the strongest argument. Sophocles Truth is a thing immortal and perpetual, and it gives to us a beauty that fades not away in time.”  Frederick The Great quote •  Add to Chapter... •      “A German singer! I should as soon expect to get pleasure from the neighing of my horse.”  Frederick The Great quote •  Add to Chapter... •      “The greatest and noblest pleasure which we have in this world is to discover new truths, and the next is to shake off old prejudices.”  Frederick The Great quote • About: Truth quotes, World quotes, Prejudice quotes, Pleasure quotes.  Add to Chapter... •      “What is the good of experience if you do not reflect?”  Frederick The Great quote •  Add to Chapter... •      “I begin by taking. I shall find scholars later to demonstrate my perfect right.”  Frederick The Great quote •  Add to Chapter... •      “Religion is the idol of the mob; it adores everything it does not understand.”  Frederick The Great quote • About: Religion quotes

  9. Queen Elisabeth • Alexander von Liezen-Mayer. Queen Elizabeth signing the DeathWarrant of Mary, Queen of Scots.Elizabeth was terribly handicapped by having no heirs of her body and no obvious English successor. She could not afford to recognize Mary's claim, for that would have been to alienate the Protestants, double the number of Catholics, and, in her own phrase, to spread a winding-sheet before her eyes; for all would have turned to the rising sun. Mary was dangerous enough as it was, and no one would willingly make his rival his heir. Elizabeth could hardly be expected to go out of her way and ask parliament to repeal its own acts for Mary's sake; probably it would have refused. Nor was it personal enmity on Elizabeth's part that brought Mary to the block. Parliament had long been ferociously demanding Mary's execution, not because she was guilty but because she was dangerous to the public peace. She alone could have given the Spanish Armada any real chance of success; and as the prospect of invasion loomed larger on the horizon, fiercer grew the popular determination to remove the only possible centre of a domestic rising, without which the external attack was bound to be a failure. Elizabeth resisted the demand, not from compassion or qualms of conscience, but because she dreaded the responsibility for Mary's death. She wished Paulet would manage the business on his own account, and when at last her signature was extorted she made a scapegoat of her secretary Davison who had the warrant executed. • \

  10. Isabella I of Castile She is the queen of Spain. [edit] Expulsion of the Jews and Muslims With the institution of the Roman Catholic Inquisition in Spain, and with the Dominican friarTomás de Torquemada as the first Inquisitor General, the Catholic Monarchs pursued a policy of religious unity. Though Isabella opposed taking harsh measures against Jews on economic grounds, Torquemada was able to convince Ferdinand. On 31 March 1492, the Alhambra Decree for the expulsion of the Jews was issued (See main article on Inquisition). Approximately 200,000 left Spain. Others converted, but often came under scrutiny by the Inquisition investigating relapsed conversos (Marranos) and the Judaizers who had been abetting them. The Muslims of the newly conquered Granada had been initially granted religious freedom, but pressure to convert increased, and after some revolts, a policy of forced expulsion or conversion was also instituted in 1502 (see Moriscos). One Converso who didn't suffer from the effects of the Inquisition was Luis de Santángel, including his family; he was the financial minister of the King and Queen, and was of great help when it came to the discovery of the New World

  11. akabar • Akbar the Great • From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia • Jump to: navigation, search • This article or section is in the middle of an expansion or major revamping. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article has not been edited in several days, please remove this template.This article or section was last edited by SpacemanSpiff (Contribs • Log) 10 seconds' time. • The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.(September 2009) Akbar the Great Mughal Emperor Reign 1556 to 1605 Full name Abu'l-FathJalalud-din Muhammad Akbar I Titles His Majesty Al-Sultan al-'AzamwalKhaqan al-Mukarram, Imam-i-'Adil, Sultan ul-Islam Kaffattul-Anam, Amir ul-Mu'minin, Khalifatul-Muta'ali Sahib-i-Zaman, Padshah Ghazi Zillu'llah ['Arsh-Ashyani], Emperor of India)[1][2] Born 15 October 1542(1542-10-15) Birthplace Amarkot Fort, Sind Died 27 October 1605 (aged 63) Place of death FatehpurSikri, Agra Buried BihishtabadSikandra, Agra Predecessor NasiruddinHumayun Successor NuruddinSalim Jahangir Offspring Jahangir, 5 other sons and 6 daughters Royal House House of Timur Dynasty Mughal Father NasiruddinHumayun Mother NawabHamidaBanu BegumSahiba Religious beliefs Islam[3],Din iIlahiJalaluddin Muhammad Akbar (جلال الدین محمد اکبر Jalālud-Dīn Muhammad Akbar), also known as Akbar the Great (October 15, 1542  – October 27, 1605) [1][2][4] was the third Mughal Emperor of India. He was of Turko-MongolTimurid descent.[5]; the son of Humayun, and the grandson of Babur who founded the dynasty. At the end of his reign in 1605 the Mughal empire covered most of Northern India.[6] • Akbar, widely considered the greatest of the Mughal emperors,[citation needed] was thirteen years old when he ascended the throne in Delhi, following the death of his father Humayun.[7] During his reign, he eliminated military threats from the Pashtun descendants of Sher Shah Suri, and at the Second Battle of Panipat he defeated the Hindu king Hemu.[8][9] It took him nearly two more decades to consolidate his power and bring parts of northern and central India into his realm. The emperor solidified his rule by pursuing diplomacy with the powerful Rajput caste, and by admitting Rajput princesses in his harem.[8][10] • Akbar's most lasting contributions were to the arts[citation needed]. He initiated a large collection of literature, including the Akbar-nama and the Ain-i-Akbari, and incorporated art from around the world into the Mughal collections[citation needed]. He also commissioned many major buildings, and invented the first prefabricated homes.[11] Akbar began a series of religious debates where Muslim scholars would debate religious matters with Sikhs, Hindus, Cārvāka atheists and Portuguese Roman Catholic Jesuits. He founded a religious cult, the Din-i-Ilahi (Divine Faith), but it amounted only to a form of personality cult for Akbar, and quickly dissolved after his death.[8][12] • Contents • [hide] • 1 Early years • 1.1 The name Akbar • 2 Military achievements • 2.1 Early conquests • 2.2 Expansion • 2.3 Consolidation • 3 Administration • 3.1 Taxation • 3.2 Military organization • 3.3 Political government • 3.4 Capital of the empire • 4 Matrimonial alliances • 5 Personality • 6 Religious policy • 6.1 Relation with Hindus • 6.2 Relations with other Muslims • 6.3 Relation with Christians • 6.4 Din-i-Ilahi • 7 In popular culture • 8 See also • 9 Notes • 10 References • 11 Further reading • 12 External links • [edit] Early years • Akbar was born on October 15, 1542 (the fourth day of Rajab, 949 AH), at the Rajput Fortress of Umerkot in Sindh, where Humayun and his recently wedded wife, HamidaBanu Begum were taking refuge[citation needed]. Humayun gave the child the name he had heard in his dream at Lahore, Jalalu-d-din Muhammad Akbar Ghazi [4][13] • Akbar as a boy • Humayun had been driven into exile in Persia by the Pashtun leader Sher Shah Suri.[14] Akbar did not go to Persia with his parents but grew up in the village of Mukundpur in Rewa (in present day Madhya Pradesh). Akbar and prince Ram Singh, who later became the Maharaja of Rewa, grew up together and stayed close friends through life. Later, Akbar moved to the eastern parts of the Safavid Empire (now a part of Afghanistan) where he was raised by his uncle Askari. He spent his youth learning to hunt, run, and fight, but he never learned to read or write.[15] Nonetheless, Akbar matured into a well-informed ruler, with refined tastes in the arts, architecture, music, and a love for literature. • Following the chaos over the succession of Sher Shah Suri's son Islam Shah, Humayunreconquered Delhi in 1555, leading an army partly provided by his Persian ally Tahmasp I. A few months later, Humayun died. Akbar's guardian,Bairam Khan concealed the death in order to prepare for Akbar's succession. Akbar succeeded Humayun on February 14, 1556, while in the midst of a war against Sikandar Shah to reclaim the Mughal throne. In Kalanaur, Punjab, the 13 year old Akbar donned a golden robe and Dark Tiara was enthroned by Bairam Khan on a newly constructed platform, which still stands.[16][17] He was proclaimed Shahanshah (Persian for "King of Kings"). Bairam Khan ruled on his behalf until he came of age.[18][19] • [edit] The name Akbar • Akbar was originally named Badruddin Akbar, because he was born on the night of a badr (full moon)[citation needed]. After the capture of Kabul by Humayun his date of birth and name were changed to throw off evil sorcerers. [20] Contrary to some popular traditions, the name Akbar - meaning "Great" - was a not an honorific given to Akbar; rather he was named for his maternal grandfather, Shaikh Ali Akbar Jami[citation needed]. • [edit] Military achievements • Flag of Mughals • [edit] Early conquests • Akbar decided early in his reign that he should eliminate the threat of Sher Shah's dynasty, and decided to lead an army against the strongest of the three, Sikandar Shah Suri, in the Punjab[citation needed]. He left Delhi under the regency of TardiBaig Khan. Sikandar Shah Suri presented no major concern for Akbar, and often withdrew from territory as Akbar approached.[citation needed] • The Hindu king Hemu, however, commanding the Afghan forces, defeated the Mughal army and captured Delhi on 6 October 1556.[18]Tardi Beg Khan promptly fled the city. News of the capitulation of Delhi spread quickly to Akbar, and he was advised to withdraw to Kabul, which was relatively secure[citation needed]. But urged by Bairam Khan, Akbar marched on Delhi to reclaim it. Tardi Beg and his retreating troops joined the march, and also urged Akbar to retreat to Kabul, but he refused again. Later, Bairam Khan had the former regent executed for cowardice, though AbulFazl and Jahangir both record[where?] that they believed that Bairam Khan was merely using the retreat from Delhi as an excuse to eliminate a rival. • Akbar's army, led by Bairam Khan, met the larger forces of Hemu on 5 November 1556 at the Second Battle of Panipat, 50 miles (80 km) north of Delhi. The battle was going in Hemu'sfavour when an arrow pierced Hemu's eye, rendering him unconscious. The leaderless army soon capitulated and Hemu was captured and executed.[21] • The victory also left Akbar with over 1,500 war elephants which he used to re-engage Sikandar Shah at the siege of Mankot. Sikandar, along with several local chieftains who were assisting him, surrendered and so was spared death[citation needed]. With this, the whole of Punjab was annexed to the Mughal empire. Before returning to Agra, Akbar sent a detachment of his army to Jammu, which defeated the ruler Raja KapurChand and captured the kingdom.[22] Between 1558 and 1560, Akbar further expanded the empire by capturing and annexing the kingdoms of Gwalior, northern Rajputana and Jaunpur.[23] • After a dispute at court, Akbar dismissed Bairam Khan in the spring of 1560 and ordered him to leave on Hajj to Mecca.[23]Bairam left for Mecca, but on his way was goaded by his opponents to rebel.[21] He was defeated by the Mughal army in the Punjab and forced to submit. Akbar, however forgave him and gave him the option of either continuing in his court or resuming his pilgrimage, of which Bairam chose the latter.[24] • [edit] Expansion • Mughal empire under Akbar • Chittorgarh Fort • After dealing with the rebellion of Bairam Khan and establishing his authority, Akbar went on to expand the Mughal empire by subjugating local chiefs and annexing neighbouring kingdoms.[25] The first major conquest was of Malwa in 1561, an expedition that was led by Adham Khan and carried out with such savage cruelty that it resulted in a backlash from the kingdom enabling its ruler BazBahadur to recover the territory while Akbar was dealing with the rebellion of Bairam Khan.[26] Subsequently, Akbar sent another detachment which captured Malwa in 1562, and BazBahadur eventually surrendered to the Mughals and was made an administrator. Around the same time, the Mughal army also conquered the kingdom of the Gonds, after a fierce battle between the Asaf Khan, the Mughal governor of Allahabad, and RaniDurgavati, the queen of the Gonds.[27] However, Asaf Khan misappropriated most of the wealth plundered from the kingdom, which Akbar subsequently forced him to restore, apart from installing Durgavati's son as the administrator of the region.[28] • Over the course of the decade following his conquest of Malwa, Akbar brought most of present-day Rajasthan, Gujarat and Bengal under his control. A major victory in this campaign was the siege of Chittor. The fortress at Chittor, ruled by MaharanaUdai Singh, was of great strategic importance as it lay on the shortest route from Agra to Gujarat and was also considered a key to central Rajasthan. On the advice of his nobles, Udai Singh retired to the hills, leaving two warriors Jaimal and Patta in charge of the fort.[28] The Mughal army surrounded the fortress in October 1567 and it fell in February 1568 after a siege of six months. The fort was then stormed by the Mughal forces, and a fierce resistance was offered by members of the garrison stationed inside, as well as local peasants who came to their assistance. The women committed jauhar while over 30000 men were massacred by the Mughal army.[29][30] It was for the first and last time that Akbar indulged in carnage of this magnitude. In commemoration of the gallantry of Jaimal and Patta, he ordered that stone statues of them seated on elephants be carved and erected at the chief gate of the Agra fort.[28][31] The fortress was completely destroyed and its gates were carried off to Agra, while the brass candlesticks taken from the Kalika temple after its destruction were given to the shrine of MoinuddinChishti in Ajmer.[29][32] • After Akbar's conquest of Chittor, two major Rajput clans remained opposed to him - the Sisodiyas of Mewar and Hadas of Ranthambore. The latter, reputed to be the most powerful fortress in Rajasthan, was conquered by the Mughal army in 1569, making Akbar the master of almost the whole of Rajputana. As a result, most of the Rajput kings, including those of Bikaner, Bundelkhand and Jaisalmer submitted to Akbar. Only the clans of Mewar continued to resist Mughal conquest and Akbar had to fight with them from time to time for the greater part of his reign.[28][29] Among the most prominent of them was MaharanaPratap who declined to accept Akbar's suzerainty and also opposed the marriage etiquette of Rajputs who had been giving their daughters to Mughals. He renounced all matrimonial alliances with Rajput rulers who had married into the Mughal dynasty, refusing such alliances even with the princes of Marwar and Amer until they agreed to sever ties with the Mughals.[33] • [edit] Consolidation • In 1566 A.D. Akbar rebuilt sections of the Lahore Fort, following attacks by the Khokhars and Timurs • Having conquered Rajputana, Akbar turned to Gujarat, whose government was in a state of disarray after the death of its previous ruler, Bahadur Shah. The province was a tempting target as it was a center of world trade, it possessed fertile soil and had highly developed crafts.[34] The province had been occupied by Humayun for a brief period, and prior to that was ruled by the Delhi Sultanate.[28] In 1572, Akbar marched to Ahmedabad, which capitulated without offering resistance. He took Surat by siege, and then crossed the Mahi river and defeated his estranged cousins, the Mirzas, in a hard-fought battle at Sarnal.[34][35] During the campaign, Akbar met a group of Portugese merchants for the first time at Cambay. Having established his authority over Gujarat, Akbar returned to Agra, but Mirza-led rebellions soon broke out. Akbar returned, crossing Rajasthan at great speed on camels and horses, and reached Ahmedabad in eleven days - a journey that normally took six weeks. Akbar's army of 3000 horsemen then defeated the enemy forces numbering 20000 in a decisive victory on September 2, 1573.[34] The conquest of Gujarat marked a significant event of Akbar's reign as it gave the Mughal empire free access to the sea and control over the rich commerce that passed through its ports. The territory and income of the empire were vastly increased.[35] The Mughal army also conquered Bengal (1574), Kabul (1581), Kashmir (1586), and Kandesh (1601), among others. Akbar installed a governor over each of the conquered provinces. • [edit] Administration • [edit] Taxation • Akbar set about reforming the administration of his empire's land revenue by adopting a system that had been used by Sher Shah Suri. A cultivated area was measured and taxed through fixed rates based on the area's crop and productivity. Because taxation rates were fixed on the basis of prices prevailing in the imperial court, however—which were often higher than those in the countryside[36] -- this placed hardship on the peasantry. Akbar changed to a decentralised system of annual assessment, but this resulted in corruption among local officials and was abandoned in 1580, to be replaced by a system called the dahsala.[37] Under the new system, revenue was calculated as one-third of the average produce of the previous ten years, to be paid to the state in cash. This system was later refined, taking into account local prices, and grouping areas with similar productivity into assessment circles. Remission was given to peasants when the harvest failed during times of flood or drought.[37] Akbar's dahsala system is credited to Raja Todar Mal, who also served as a revenue officer under Sher Shah Suri.[38] • Other local methods of assessment continued in some areas. Land which was fallow or uncultivated was charged at concessional rates.[39] Akbar also actively encouraged the improvement and extension of agriculture. Zamindars of every area were required to provide loans and agricultural implements in times of need, to encourage farmers to plow as much land as possible and to sow seeds of superior quality. In turn, the Zamindars were given a heriditary right to collect a share of the produce. Peasants had a heriditary right to cultivate the land as long as they paid the land revenue. • [edit] Military organization • Main article: Mansabdari • Akbar organized his army as well as the nobility by means of a system called the mansabdari. Under this system, each officer in the army was assigned a rank (a mansab), and assigned a number of cavalry that he had to supply to the imperial army.[38] The mansabdars were divided into 33 classes. The top three commanding ranks, ranging from 7000 to 10000 troops, were normally reserved for princes. Other ranks between 10 and 5000 were assigned to other members of the nobility. • The empire's permanent standing army was quite small and the imperial forces mosly consisted of contingents maintained by the mansabdars.[40] Each mansabdar was required to maintain a certain number of cavalrymen and twice that number of horses. The number of horses was greater because they had to be rested and rapidly replaced in times of war. Akbar employed strict measures to ensure that the quality of the armed forces was maintained at a high level; horses were regularly inspected and only Arabian horses were normally employed.[41] • [edit] Political government • The court of Akbar, an illustration from Akbarnama • Akbar's system of central government was based on the system that had evolved since the Delhi Sultanate, but the functions of various departments were carefully reorganised by laying down detailed regulations for their functioning.[citation needed] • The revenue department was headed by a wazir, responsible for all finances and management of jagir and inam lands.[42] • The head of the military was called the mirbakshi, appointed from among the leading nobles of the court. The mirbakshi was in charge of intelligence gathering, and also made recommendations to the emperor for military appointments and promotions. • The mirsaman was in charge of the imperial household, including the harems, and supervised the functioning of the court and royal bodyguard. • The judiciary was a separate organization headed by a chief qazi, who was also responsible for religious endowments.[43] • Akbar departed from the policy of his predecessors in his treatment of the territories he conquered. Previous Mughals extracted a large tribute from these rulers and then leave them to administer their dominions autonomously; Akbar integrated them into his administration, providing them the opportunity to serve as military rulers. He thus simultaneously controlled their power while increasing their prestige as a part of the imperial ruling class.[44] Some of these rulers went on to become the navaratnas in Akbar's court. • [edit] Capital of the empire • Diwan-i-Khas – Hall of Private Audience • Akbar was a follower of SalimChishti, a holy man who lived in the region of Sikri near Agra, who later blessed him with three sons. Believing the neighbourhood to be a lucky one for himself, he had a mosque constructed there for the use of the saint. Subsequently, he celebrated the victories over Chittor and Ranthambore by laying the foundation of a new walled capital, 23 miles (37 km) west of Agra in 1569, which was named Fatehpur ("town of victory") after the conquest of Gujarat in 1573 and subsequently came to be known as FatehpurSikri in order to distinguish it from other similarly named towns.[28] Palaces for each of Akbar's senior queens, a huge artificial lake, and sumptuous water-filled courtyards were built there. However, the city was soon abandoned and the capital was moved to Lahore in 1585. The reason may have been that the water supply in FatehpurSikri was insufficient or of poor quality. Or, as some historians believe, Akbar had to attend to the northwest areas of his empire and therefore moved his capital northwest. Other sources indicate Akbar simply lost interest in the city[45] or realized it was not militarily defensible. In 1599, Akbar shifted his capital back to Agra from where he reigned until his death. • [edit] Matrimonial alliances • MaharanaPratap • Akbar persuaded the KacchwahaRajput, Raja Bharmal, of Amber (modern day Jaipur) into accepting a matrimonial alliance for his daughter HarkaBai. This was the first instance of royal matrimony between Hindu and Muslim dynasties in India. HarkaBai was rechristened Mariam-uz-Zamani. After her marriage she was treated as an outcaste by her family and for the rest of her life never visited Amber.[46] She was not assigned any significant place either in Agra or Delhi, but rather a small village in the Bharatpur district.[46] She died in 1623. As a custom Hindus were cremated and never buried;[47] her burial near Agra signifies that she converted to Islam.[48] A mosque was built in her honor by her son Jahangir in Lahore.[49] • Other Rajput kingdoms also established matrimonial alliances with Akbar. The law of Hindu succession has always been patrimonial, so the Hindu lineage was not threatened in marrying their princesses for political gain.[citation needed]Rajputs who married daughters to Mughals still did not treat Mughals as equals, however, hey would not dine with Mughals or take Muslim wives.[50] • Two major Rajput clans remained against him, the Sisodiyas of Mewar and Hadas (Chauhans) of Ranthambore. In another turning point of Akbar's reign, Raja Man Singh I of Amber went with Akbar to meet the Hada leader, SurjanHada, to effect an alliance. Surjan grudgingly accepted an alliance on the condition that Akbar did not marry any of his daughters. Surjan later moved his residence to Varanasi. • Other Rajput nobles did not like the idea of their kings marrying their daughters to Mughals. RathoreKalyandas threatened to kill both Mota Raja Udai Singh (of Jodhpur) and Jahangir because Udai Singh had decided to marry his daughter JodhaBai to Jahangir. Akbar on hearing this ordered imperial forces to attack Kalyandas at Siwana. Kalyandas died fighting along with his men and the women of Siwana committed Jauhar.[51] • Entering into alliance with Rajput kingdoms enabled Akbar to extend the border of his Empire to far off regions, and the Rajputs became the strongest allies of the Mughals. Rajput soldiers fought for the Mughal empire for the next 130 years till its collapse following the death of Aurangzeb.[citation needed] To foster their compliance, Akbar kept the eldest sons of his Rajput allies as hostages.[48] • [edit] Personality • Akbar hunting with cheetahs, c. 1602 • Akbar on an elephant • Akbar's reign was chronicled extensively by his court historian AbulFazal in the books Akbarnama and Ain-i-akbari. Other contemporary sources of Akbar's reign include the works of Badayuni, ShaikhzadaRashidi and Shaikh Ahmed Sirhindi. • Akbar was an artisan, warrior, artist, armourer, blacksmith, carpenter, emperor, general, inventor, animal trainer (reputedly keeping thousands of hunting cheetahs during his reign and training many himself), lacemaker, technologist and theologian.[11] • Akbar is said to have been a wise ruler and a sound judge of character. His son and heir, Jahangir, in his memoirs, wrote effusive praise of Akbar's character, and dozens of anecdotes to illustrate his virtues.[52] According to Jahangir, Akbar's complexion was like the yellow of wheat. Antoni de Montserrat, the Catalan Jesuit who visited his court described him as plainly white. Akbar was not tall but powerfully built and very agile. He was also noted for various acts of courage. One such incident occurred on his way back from Malwa to Agra when Akbar was 19 years of age. • Akbar rode alone in advance of his escort and was confronted by a tigress who, along with her cubs, came out from the shrubbery across his path. When the tigress charged the emperor, he was alleged to have dispatched the animal with his sword in a solitary blow. His approaching attendants found the emperor standing quietly by the side of the dead animal.[53] • AbulFazal, and even the hostile critic Badayuni, described him as having a commanding personality. He was notable for his command in battle, and, "like Alexander of Macedon, was always ready to risk his life, regardless of political consequences". He often plunged on his horse into the flooded river during the rainy seasons and safely crossed it. He rarely indulged in cruelty and is said to have been affectionate towards his relatives. He pardoned his brother Hakim, who was a repented rebel. But on rare occasions, he dealt cruelly with offenders, such as his maternal uncle Muazzam and his foster-brother Adham Khan. • Akbar and Tansen, visit Swami Haridas at Vrindavan, a painting c. 1750 • He is said to have been extremely moderate in his diet. Ain-e-Akbari mentions that during his travels and also while at home, Akbar drank water from the Ganga river, which he called ‘the water of immortality’. Special people were stationed at Sorun and later Haridwar to dispatch water, in sealed jars, to wherever he was stationed.[54] According to Jahangir's memoirs, he was fond of fruits and had little liking for meat, which he stopped eating in his later years. He was more religiously tolerant than many of the Muslim rulers before and after him. Jahangir wrote: • "As in the wide expanse of the Divine compassion there is room for all classes and the followers of all creeds, so... in his dominions, ... there was room for the professors of opposite religions, and for beliefs good and bad, and the road to altercation was closed. Sunnis and Shias met in one mosque, and Franks and Jews in one church, and observed their own forms of worship.[52]" • To defend his stance that speech arose from hearing, he carried out a language deprivation experiment, and had children raised in isolation, not allowed to be spoken to, and pointed out that as they grew older, they remained mute.[55] • During Akbar's reign, the ongoing process of inter-religious discourse and syncretism resulted in a series of religious attributions to him in terms of positions of assimilation, doubt or uncertainty, which he either assisted himself or left unchallenged.[56] Such hagiographical accounts of Akbar traversed a wide range of denominational and sectarian spaces, including several accounts by Parsis, Jains and Jesuit missionaries, apart from contemporary accounts by Brahminical and Muslim orthodoxy.[57] Existing sects and denominations, as well as various religious figures who represented popular worship felt they had a claim to him. The diversity of these accounts is attributed to the fact that his reign resulted in the formation of a flexible centralised state accompanied by personal authority and cultural heterogenity.[56] • [edit] Religious policy • Akbar, as well as his mother and other members of his family, are believed to be Sunni Muslims.[58] His early days were spent in the backdrop of an atmosphere in which liberal sentiments were encouraged and religious narrow-mindednness was frowned upon.[59] From the fifteenth century, a number of rulers in various parts of the country adopted a more liberal policy of religious tolerance, attempting to foster communal harmony between Hindus and Muslims.[60] These sentiments were further encouraged by the teachings of popular saints like Chaitanya, Guru Nanak and Kabir,[59] as well as the Timurid ethos of religious tolerance that persisted in the polity right from the times of Timur to Humayun, and influenced Akbar's policy of tolerance in matters of religion.[61] Further, his childhood tutors, who included two IraniShias, were largely above sectarian prejudices, and made a significant contribution to Akbar's later inclination towards religious tolerance.[61] • One of Akbar's first actions after gaining actual control of the administration was the abolition of jizya, a tax which all non-Muslims were required to pay, in 1562.[59] The tax was reinstated in 1575,[62] a move which has been viewed as being symbolic of vigrous Islamic policy,[63] but was again repealed in 1580.[64] • [edit] Relation with Hindus • Kangra Fort at Kangra, Himachal Pradesh • Allahabad Fort • Akbar's attitudes towards his Hindu subjects were an amalgam of Timurid, Persian and Indian ideas of sovereignity.[60] The liberal principles of the empire were strengthened by incorporating Hindus into the nobility.[59] However, historian Dasharatha Sharma states that court histories like the Akbarnama idealize Akbar's religious tolerance, and give Akbar more credit than he is due.[65] • Akbar in his early years was not only a practising Muslim but is also reported to have had an intolerant attitude towards Hindus.[66] It was during this period that he boasted of being a great conqueror of Islam to the ruler of Turan, Abdullah Khan, in a letter in 1579,[67] and was also looked upon by orthodox Muslim elements as a devout believer committed to defending the religion against infidels.[68] However, his attitude towards the Hindu religion and its practices no longer remained hostile after he began his marriage alliances with Rajput princes. He was also perceived as not being averse to performing Hindu rituals despite his Islamic beliefs.[68] • Hindus boycotted the Vishwanath temple built by Akbar's general Man Singh (which he built after taking Akbar's permission) because Man Singh's family had marital relations with Akbar.[69] Akbar's Hindu generals could not construct temples without the emperor's permission. In Bengal, after Man Singh started the construction of a temple in 1595, Akbar ordered him to convert it into a mosque.[70] • Akbar allowed the conversion of a mosque into Hindu temple at Kurukshetra.[71] He gave two villages for the upkeep of a mosque and a Madrasa which was setup by destroying a Hindu temple.[71] Akbar's army was responsible for the demolition of rich Hindu temples which had gold idols in the Doab region.[71] He changed the name of some Hindu holy places to Islamic ones; for example changing Prayag to Allahabad in 1583.[72][73] • [edit] Relations with other Muslims • Gate of the Akbar's mausoleum at Sikandra, Agra, 1795 • Akbar's upper grave • Silver coin of Akbar with inscriptions of the Islamic declaration of faith • During the early part of his reign, Akbar adopted an attitude of suppression towards Muslim sects that were condemned by the orthodoxy as heretical.[68] In 1567, on the advice of ShaikhAbdu'nNabi, he ordered the exhumation of Mir MurtazaSharifiShirazi - a Shia buried in Delhi - because of the grave's proximity to that of Amir Khusrau, arguing that a "heretic" could not be buried so close to the grave of a Sunni saint, reflecting a restrictive attitude towards Shi'ism which continued to persist till the early 1570s.[74] He suppressed Mahdavism in 1573 during his campaign in Gujarat, in the course of which the Mahdavi leader Miyan Mustafa Bandagi was arrested and brought in chains to the court.[74] However, as Akbar increasingly came under the influence of pantheistic Sufi mysticism from the early 1570s, it caused a great shift in his outlook and culminated in his ultimate rejection of Islam as traditionally professed, in favour of a new concept of Islam transcending the limits of religion.[74] • In 1580, a rebellion broke out in the eastern part of Akbar's empire, and a number of fatwas, declaring Akbar to be a heretic, were issued by qazis. Akbar suppressed the rebellion and handed out severe punishments to the qazis. In order to further strengthen his position in dealing with the qazis, Akbar issued a mazhar or declaration.[75] The Mahzar asserted that Akbar was the Khalifa of the age, the rank of the Khalifa was higher than that of a Mujtahid, in case of a difference of opinion among the mujtahids, Akbar could select any one opinion and could also issue decrees which did not go against the nass.[76] Given the prevailing Islamic sectarian conflicts in various parts of the country at that time, it is believed that the mazhar helped in stabilising the religious situation in the empire.[75] • Hejaz • Akbar's relations with the Ottoman Empire are believed to have strained. He sent a Hajj caravan, including members of his harem, from Surat, which reached Mecca and Medina in 1577. Four more caravans were sent from 1577 to 1580, with gifts and sadaqah for the authorities of Mecca and Medina. The pilgrims in these caravans were poor, however, and their stay strained the resources of these cities.[77][78] Ottoman authorities requested that the pilgrims return home, but the ladies of the harem did not want to leave Hejaz. At length they were forced to return. The Governor of Aden insulted the ladies of the harem on their way back to India.[citation needed] These events persuaded Akbar to stop sending Hajj caravans and sadaqat to Mecca and Medina. From 1584 onwards, Akbar seriously considered attacking the Ottoman port of Yemen with the help of the Portuguese.[citation needed] To forge an alliance, a Mughal envoy was stationed in Goa permanently as of October 1584. In 1587 a Portuguese fleet sent to attack Yemen was defeated. The Mughal-Portuguese alliance fell through.[79] • [edit] Relation with Christians • Akbar met Portugese Jesuit priests and sent an ambassador to Goa, requesting them to send two missionaries to his court so that he could understand Christian doctrines better. In response, the Portugese sent Monserrate and Aquiviva who remained at Akbar's court for three years and left accounts of their visit.[80] In 1603 a written firman was granted at the request of the Christian priests allowing them to make willing converts.[81] Even armed with the firman, the missionaries however found it extremely difficult to carry out their work as the Viceroy of Lahore, [Qulij Khan, who was a staunch Muslim official, was so harassing in his tactics that many Christians fled from Lahore and Father Pinheiro went in fear of death.[82] • [edit] Din-i-Ilahi • Akbar was deeply interested in religious and philosophical matters. An orthodox Muslim at the outset, he later came to be influenced by Sufi mysticism that was being preached in the country at that time, and moved away from orthodoxy, appointing to his court several talented people with liberal ideas, including AbulFazl, Faizi and Birbal. In 1575, he built a hall called the IbadatKhana ("House of Worship") at FatehpurSikri, to which he invited theologians, mystics and selected courtiers renowned for their intellectual achievements and discussed matters of spirituality with them.[59] These discussions, initially restricted to Muslims, were acrimonious and resulted in the participants shouting at and abusing each other. Upset by this, Akbar opened the IbadatKhana to people of all religions as well as atheists, resulting in the scope of the discussions broadening and extending even into areas such as the validity of the Quran and the nature of God. This shocked the orthodox theologians, who sought to discredit Akbar by circulating rumours of his desire to forsake Islam.[75] • Akbar's efforts to evolve a meeting point among the representatives of various religions was not very successful, as each of them attempted to assert the superiority of their respective religions by denouncing other religions. Meanwhile, the debates at the IbadatKhana grew more acrimonious and, contrary to their purpose of leading to a better understanding among religions, instead led to greater bitterness among them, resulting to the discontinuance of the debates by Akbar in 1582.[80] However, his interaction with various religious theologians had convinced him that despite their differences, all religions had several good practices, which he sought to combine into a new religious movement known as Din-i-Ilahi.[83][84] However, some modern scholars claim that Akbar did not initiate a new religion and did not use the word Din-i-Ilahi.[85] At about this time, he began to indicate that he had lost faith in the creed of the prophet of Mecca.[86] • The purported Din-i-Ilahi was more of an ethical system and is said to have prohibited lust, sensuality, slander and pride, considering them sins. Piety, prudence, abstinence and kindness are the core virtues. The soul is encouraged to purify itself through yearning of God.[87] Celibacy was respected, the slaughter of animals was forbidden and there were no sacred scriptures or a priestly hierarchy.[88] Though leading Noble of Akbar's court, Aziz Koka, wrote a letter to him from Mecca in 1594 and accused him that starting of the new cult by Akbar amounted to nothing more than a desire on Akbar's part to portray himself as "a new prophet".[89] • Misconceptions about Akbar propounding a new religion arose because Blochman, translator of Ain-i-Akbari into English in 1873, erroneously rendered A'in-iIradatGazinan which literally means Regulations for those privileged to be his disciple as Ordinances of the Divine Faith. Also when Blochman translated Badayuni he again mistranslated halqa-iiradat and silsilah-imuridan as Divine Faith and the new religion respectively when these terms literally stand for circle of disciples.[90] Another mistranslation by Blochman has altered the meaning of AbulFazl's words. Fazl says a few were accepted from many into "the circle of discipleship" while Blochman renders it erroneously as "candidates to the New Faith".[91] At the time of Akbar's death in 1605 there were no signs of discontentment amongst his Muslim subjects and the impression of even a theologian like Abdu'lHaq was that Akbar remained a Muslim.[92] • [edit] In popular culture • In 2008, director AshutoshGowariker released a film telling the story of Akbar and his wife HiraKunwari (known more popularly as JodhaBai), titled Jodhaa Akbar. Akbar was played by HrithikRoshan and Jodhaa was played by AishwaryaRai. • Akbar was portrayed in the award-winning 1960 Hindi movieMughal-e-Azam (The great Mughal), in which his character was played by PrithvirajKapoor. • Akbar and Birbal were portrayed in the Hindi series Akbar-Birbal aired on Zee TV in late 1990s where Akbar's role was essayed by VikramGokhale. • A television series, called Akbar the Great, directed by Sanjay Khan was aired on DD National in the 1990s. • A fictionalized Akbar plays an important supporting role in Kim Stanley Robinson's 2002 novel, The Years of Rice and Salt. • Akbar is also a major character in Salman Rushdie's 2008 novel The Enchantress of Florence. • AmartyaSen uses Akbar as a prime example in his books The Argumentative Indian and Violence and Identity. • Bertrice Small is known for incorporating historical figures as primary characters in her romance novels, and Akbar is no exception. He is a prominent figure in two of her novels, and mentioned several times in a third, which takes place after his death. In This Heart of Mine the heroine becomes Akbar's fortieth "wife" for a time, while Wild Jasmine and Darling Jasmine centre around the life of his half-British daughter. His end was an unfortunate luck to both Persian and Indian. • Akbar is also the AI Personality of India in the renowned game Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties. • The violin concerto nicknamed "Il Grosso Mogul" written by Antonio Vivaldi in the 1720s, and listed in the standard catalogue as RV 208, is considered to be indirectly inspired by Akbar's reign. • In KunalBasu'sThe Miniaturist, the story revolves around a young painter during Akbar's time who paints his own version of the Akbarnama' • [edit] See also • List of people known as The Great • Touch Pieces • Tutinama • [edit] Notes • ^ ab "Jalal-ud-din Mohammed Akbar Biography". BookRags. http://www.bookrags.com/biography/jalal-ud-din-mohammed-akbar/. Retrieved 2008-05-23.  • ^ ab "Akbar". The South Asian. http://www.the-south-asian.com/Dec2000/Akbar.htm. Retrieved 2008-05-23.  • ^Habib 1997, p. 96 • ^ abConversion of Islamic and Christian dates (Dual) As per the date convertor Akbar's birth date, as per Humayunnama, of 04 Rajab, 949 AH, corresponds to October 14, 1542. • ^ "Timurid Dynasty". New World Encyclopedia. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Timurid_Dynasty. Retrieved 2009-07-18.  • ^ "Extant of Empire". http://www.writespirit.net/authors/akbar.  • ^ "The Nine Gems of Akbar". Boloji. http://www.boloji.com/history/022.htm. Retrieved 2008-05-23.  • ^ abcFazl, Abul. Akbarnama Volume II.  • ^ Prasad, Ishwari (1970). The life and times of Humayun. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ishwari%20Prasad%20life%20and%20times%20of%20humayun&hl=en&lr=&oi=scholart.  • ^ "Akbar". Columbia Encyclopedia. 2008. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-Akbar.html. Retrieved 2008-05-30.  • ^ abHabib, Irfan (1992). "Akbar and Technology". Social Scientist20: 3–15. doi:10.2307/3517712.  • ^Fazl, Abul. Akbarnama Volume III.  • ^Part 10:..the birth of AkbarHumayunnama, Columbia University. • ^Banjerji, S.K.. HumayunBadshah.  • ^Fazl, Abul. Akbarnama Volume I.  • ^ "Gurdas". Government of Punjab. http://punjabgovt.nic.in/government/gurdas1.GIF. Retrieved 2008-05-30.  • ^HistoryGurdaspur district website. • ^ abChandra 2007, p. 226 • ^Smith 2002, p. 337 • ^Hoyland, J.S.; Banerjee S.N. (1996). Commentary of Father Monserrate, S.J: On his journey to the court of Akbar, Asean Educational Services Published. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services. p. 57. ISBN8120608070.  • ^ abChandra 2007, p. 227 • ^Habib 1997, p. 3 • ^ abSmith 2002, p. 339 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 228 • ^Habib 1997, p. 4 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 229 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 230 • ^ abcdefChandra 2007, p. 231 • ^ abcSmith 2002, p. 342 • ^ Chandra, Dr. Satish (2001). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. HarAnand Publications. p. 107. ISBN8124105227.  • ^Smith 2002, p. 343 • ^ Watson, C.C. (1904). Rajputana District Gazetteers. Scottish Mission Industries Co., Ltd.. p. 17.  • ^James Tod, Annals and Antiquities of Rajast'han or the Central and Western Rajpoot States of India, 2 vols. London, Smith, Elder (1829, 1832); New Delhi, Munshiram Publishers, (2001), pp. 83-4. ISBN 8170691281 • ^ abcChandra 2007, p. 232 • ^ abSmith 2002, p. 344 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 233 • ^ abChandra 2007, p. 234 • ^ abChandra 2007, p. 236 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 235 • ^Smith 2002, p. 359 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 237 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 240 • ^Chandra 2007, p. 241 • ^Habib 1997, p. 15 • ^ Petersen, A. (1996). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture. New York: Routledge. • ^ abNath 1982, p. 397 • ^Nath 1982, p. 16 • ^ abSarkar 1984, p. 38 • ^Nath 1982, p. 52 • ^Sarkar 1984, p. 37 • ^Alam, Muzaffar; Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (1998). The Mughal State, 1526-1750. Oxford University Press. p. 177. ISBN9780195639056.  • ^ abJahangir (1600s). Tuzk-e-Jahangiri (Memoirs of Jahangir).  • ^Garbe, Richard von (1909). Akbar, Emperor of India. Chicago-The Open Court Publishing Company.  • ^HardwarAin-e-Akbari, by AbulFazl 'Allami, Volume I, A´I´N 22. The A´bda´rKha´nah. P 55. Translated from the original persian, by H. Blochmann, and Colonel H. S. Jarrett, Asiatic society of Bengal. Calcutta, 1873 – 1907. • ^ "1200—1750". University of Hamburg. http://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/bibweb/Miles/1200-1750.html. Retrieved 2008-05-30.  • ^ abSangari 2007, p. 497 • ^Sangari 2007, p. 475 • ^Habib 1997, p. 80 • ^ abcdeChandra 2007, p. 253 • ^ abChandra 2007, p. 252 • ^ abHabib 1997, p. 81 • ^ Day, UpendraNath (1970). The Mughal Government, A.D. 1556-1707. MunshiramManoharlal. p. 134.  • ^Ali 2006, p. 159 • ^Dasgupta, Ajit Kumar (1993). History of Indian Economic Thought. Routledge. p. 45. ISBN0415061954.  • ^Paliwal, Dr. D.L. (Ed.). MaharanaPratapSmritiGranth. SahityaSansthan Rajasthan VidyaPeeth. p. 182.  • ^Habib 1997, p. 84 • ^Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (2005). Mughals and Franks. Oxford University Press. p. 55. ISBN9780195668667.  • ^ abcHabib 1997, p. 85 • ^Udayakumar, S. P. (2005). Presenting the Past: Anxious History and Ancient Future in Hindutva India. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 99. ISBN0275972097.  • ^ Forbes, Geraldine; Tomlinson, B.R. (2005). The new Cambridge history of India. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN0521267285.  • ^ abcHarbans, Mukhia (2004). The Mughals of India. Blackwell Publishing. p. 23. ISBN9780631185550.  • ^Conder, Josiah (1828). The Modern Traveller: a popular description. R.H.Tims. p. 282.  • ^Deefholts, Margaret; Deefholts, Glenn; Acharya, Quentine (2006). The Way We Were: Anglo-Indian Cronicles. Calcutta Tiljallah Relief Inc. p. 87. ISBN0975463934.  • ^ abcHabib 1997, p. 86 • ^ abcChandra 2007, p. 254 • ^Hasan, SaiyidNurul et al (2005). Religion, state, and society in medieval India: collected works of S. NurulHasan. Oxford University Press. p. 79. ISBN9780195667653.  • ^ Ottoman court chroniclers (1578). MuhimmeDefterleri, Vol. 32 f 292 firman 740, Shaban 986.  • ^ Khan, IqtidarAlam (1999). Akbar and his age. Northern Book Centre. p. 218. ISBN9788172111083.  • ^ Ottoman court chroniclers (1588). MuhimmeDefterleri, Vol. 62 f 205 firman 457, Avail Rabiulavval 996.  • ^ abChandra 2007, p. 255 • ^Krishnamurti, R; (1961). Akbar: The Religious Aspect. Faculty of Arts, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda. p. 83.  • ^MacLagan, Edward ; (1932). The Jesuits and the Great Mogul. Burns, Oates & Washbourne. p. 60.  • ^Chandra 2007, p. 256 • ^ "Din-iIlahi — Britannica Online Encyclopedia". Britannica.com. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9030480/Din-i-Ilahi. Retrieved 2009-07-18.  • ^ Sharma, Sri Ram (1988). The Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors. MunshiramManoharlal Publishers. p. 42. ISBN8121503957.  • ^Smith 2002, p. 348 • ^ Roy Choudhury, MakhanLal (1941), The Din-i-Ilahi, or, The religion of Akbar (3rd ed.), New Delhi: Oriental Reprint (published 1985, 1997), ISBN8121507774 • ^ "Children's Knowledge Bank — Google Books". Books.google.com. http://books.google.com/books?id=0ti8clvedTAC. Retrieved 2009-07-18.  • ^Koka,Aziz (1594). King's College Collection, MS 194. This letter is preserved in Cambridge University Library. p. ff.5b-8b.  • ^Ali 2006, p. 163 • ^Ali 2006, p. 164 • ^Habib 1997, p. 96 • [edit] References • Habib, Irfan (1997). Akbar and His India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. ISBN9780195637915.  • Nath, R. (1982). History of Mughal Architecture. Abhinav Publications. ISBN9788170171591.  • Chandra, Satish (2007). History of Medieval India. New Delhi: Orient Longman. ISBN9788125032267.  • Sarkar, Jadunath (1984). A History of Jaipur. Orient Longman. ISBN8125003339.  • Smith, Vincent A. (2002). The Oxford History of India. Oxford University Press. ISBN9780195612974.  • Ali, M.A. (2006). Mughal India: Studies in Polity, Ideas, Society and Culture. Oxford University Press. ISBN0195648609.  • Sangari, Kumkum (2007). "Akbar: The Name of a Conjuncture". in Grewal, J.S.. The State and Society in Medieval India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 475-501. ISBN9780195667202.  • [edit] Further reading • Abu al-Fazlibn Mubarak Akbar-namah Edited with commentary by Muhammad Sadiq Ali (Kanpur-Lucknow: NawalKishore) 1881–3 Three Vols. (Persian) • Abu al-Fazlibn Mubarak Akbarnamah Edited by MaulaviAbd al-Rahim. Bibliotheca Indica Series (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal) 1877–1887 Three Vols. (Persian) • Henry Beveridge (Trans.) The Akbarnama of Ab-ul-Fazl Bibliotheca Indica Series (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal) 1897 Three Vols. • Haji Muhammad 'ArifQandahariTarikh-i-Akbari (Better known as Tarikh-i-Qandahari) edited & Annotated by HajiMu'in'd-Din Nadwi, Dr. Azhar 'Ali Dihlawi & Imtiyaz 'Ali 'Arshi

  12. Links • Yes all these pictures and some of the info is from • wikipedia.org

More Related