1 / 10

Expert Elicitation

Expert Elicitation. A Worked Example. Avoiding Bias. Basing judgement on all knowledge and consider all available relevant evidence; Consider the widest possibilities for a range of values and not be constrained by a particular value or range;

cais
Download Presentation

Expert Elicitation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Expert Elicitation A Worked Example

  2. Avoiding Bias • Basing judgement on all knowledge and consider all available relevant evidence; • Consider the widest possibilities for a range of values and not be constrained by a particular value or range; • Be prepared to contradict your own previous thinking and statements • Be realistic about your level of confidence or experience of a particular subject; • Avoid decisions that might be biased towards organisational goals.

  3. Emission Parameters a) % that is Solvent based ink 75% b) % Solvent content of ink 60% 10% c) % inks used in unabated plant d) % lost from abated plant 10% a * b * (c + (1-c) * d) = 85.5

  4. Triangular Lognormal Uniform Probability Distribution Functions normal Distribution Types: Max Min Mean

  5. Min Max Uncertainty Mean a) % that is Solvent based ink 75% 74% - 76% -- b) % Solvent content of ink 60% 10% c) % inks used in unabated plant d) % lost from abated plant 10% Sales of Solvent based Inks

  6. Min Max Uncertainty Mean a) % that is Solvent based ink 75% 74% - 76% -- b) % Solvent content of ink 60% 10% c) % inks used in unabated plant d) % lost from abated plant 10% Likely average value range 65% Solvent 55% Solvent 45% Solvent 75% Solvent 60% Solvent Extremes 80% ? 40% ? Solvent Content Assessment 55% - 65% +- 8% Most Likely Least Likely

  7. Min Max Uncertainty Mean a) % that is Solvent based ink 75% 74% - 76% -- b) % Solvent content of ink 60% 55% - 65% +- 8% c) % inks used in unabated plant 10% d) % lost from abated plant 10% Min Max 40% 7% 13% Known level of unabatement Assumed all 11 plant are abated Assumed all 11 plant are unabated Assumed 2 additional unabated plant Of 11 unknown plant % of solvent Ink consumption in unabated plant 7% - 13% +- 30% Most Likely Least Likely

  8. Min Max Uncertainty Mean a) % that is Solvent based ink 75% 74% - 76% -- b) % Solvent content of ink 60% 55% - 65% +- 8% c) % inks used in unabated plant 10% 7% - 13% +- 30% d) % lost from abated plant 10% Min Max 10% 20% 5% 15% Extremes % losses due to Fugitive 5% - 15% +- 50% Most Likely Least Likely

  9. Mean Uncertainty Min Max 74% - 76% -- a) % that is Solvent based ink 75% 55% - 65% +- 8% b) % Solvent content of ink 60% 7% - 13% +- 30% c) % inks used in unabated plant 10% 5% - 15% +- 50% d) % lost from abated plant 10% Combining Uncertainties Approach 1 (Equation) Approach 2 (Monte Carlo) Use Good Practice Guide 85.5kg/tonne ink +- 29% Summary

  10. Elicitation Documentation

More Related