1 / 27

LIN1180 Semantics Lecture 11

LIN1180 Semantics Lecture 11. Verbs and situation types continued. Part 1. Classifying verbs: lexical semantic distinctions. Dynamic vs. Static. Compare: John is a lazy guy. S tephanie is a beautiful woman.

cai
Download Presentation

LIN1180 Semantics Lecture 11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LIN1180 SemanticsLecture 11 Verbs and situation types continued

  2. Part 1 Classifying verbs: lexical semantic distinctions

  3. Dynamic vs. Static • Compare: • John is a lazy guy. • Stephanie is a beautiful woman. • (1) and (2) describe “situations” or “states of affairs” which are stable or unchanging • Steve is driving across Europe. • I ate a pizza last night. • (3) and (4) describe “situations” or “states of affairs” which are dynamic, changing over time

  4. Dynamic vs. static • The distinction affects lexical choice. • Often, static situations are described using adjectives: • Static: the pears are ripe (adjective) • Dynamic: the pears ripened (verb) • But not always: • John is a lazy guy. • Adjectives tend to be inherently stative • Verbs differ in whether they are stative or dynamic.

  5. Stative verbs • Allow the speaker to view a situation as steady and relatively unchanging. • no reference to an explicit endpoint • no reference to change • Compare: • Mary knows Greek. (stative) • Mary learned Greek. (dynamic)

  6. Stative verbs • ?Mary is knowing Greek. • progressive has connotations of dynamism and change • clashes with the inherent semantics of the stative verb • Mary is learning Greek. • progressive is fine with a dynamic verb

  7. Stative verbs • ?Know Greek! • imperative usually odd with statives • Learn Greek! • imperative is fine with dynamic verbs • Exceptions: • remain seems to be inherently stative • allows imperative: Remain seated! • Maltese equivalent of know (jaf): • Kun af li lbieraħ morna. (Know that we went yesterday) • but: ?Kun af il-Greek (Know Greek!) • Maybe a special usage?

  8. Dynamic verb types • Further classified into sub-types: • durative vs. punctual • whether situation described by verb lasts for a period of time or not • John winked. (punctual) • John slept. (durative) • telic/resultative vs. atelic • whether verb describes a situation with a natural end-point • I built a house (telic) • I looked out over the mountains (atelic)

  9. Semelfactive punctual verbs • inherently punctual • tend to describe situations which are very brief • e.g. wink, blink, flash, shoot, knock, sneeze, cough • Combination with durative adverbials like all night, results in clash between lexical aspect (non-durative) and the modifier (durative) • The light flashedfor an hour • I knockedfor 5 minutes • Clash results in an iterative interpretation

  10. More on durative verbs • Resultativedurativeverbs describe situations with a natural end-point • She baked a meat pie. • Process + end-point • During the process, the meat pie doesn’t exist • Meat pie is the result of the process. • Inchoative verbs describe situations which give rise to a new state • The leaves turned brown. • Process giving rise to new state • At the start of the process, the leaves aren’t brown • the state of being brown is the outcome

  11. More on the telic/atelic distinction • Though a verb can be inherently telic/atelic, the overall aspect of a sentence can change depending on grammatical environment: • Atelic:Jane was singing. • no specific endpoint • Telic: Jane was singing a song. • direct object gives rise to a telic reading • singing a song has a natural endpoint

  12. More on the telic/atelic distinction • Telic/atelic also interacts with grammatical aspect • Telic: Lucien Freud painted my portrait. • implies completion: my portrait was finished • Atelic:Lucien Freud was painting my portrait. • no implication of completion: no information about whether the portrait was finished

  13. More on the telic/atelic distinction • In some languages, there is a derivational process to turn atelic to telic ones. • German: • essen (eat)  aufessen (eat up/finish eating) • aufessen implies completion

  14. The verb classification so far

  15. Part 2 Classifying situation types

  16. Some assumptions • Our task: • describe types of verbs based on lexical aspect • correlate these to types of situations • We will assume a basic distinction between static and dynamic situations • static: tends to be described by stative verbs • dynamic: tends to be described by dynamic verbs

  17. Dynamic situations • Punctual/durative verb distinction correlates with the kind of situation we’re talking about. • event: speaker views the entire situation • the mine blew up • blow up is a punctual verb • process: speaker considers the internal change in the situation • she walked into the theatre • walk is a durative verb

  18. Vendler’s classification • Vendler (1957): • proposed a classification of situation types • main aim was to describe real situations and correlate them with different verb types in language • main distinctions: • states • activities • accomplishments • achievements processes and events

  19. Vendler’s states • Roughly, the kinds of situations that can be described by stative verbs • know, believe etc • typically, verbs describing these states don’t allow the progressive aspect in most contexts • ?I am believing the news • I believe the news

  20. Activities vs. Accomplishments • Both are kinds of processes • e.g. they are described by dynamic verbs • the verbs allow the progressive aspect • Main difference is one of boundedness • roughly corresponds to the semantic telic/atelic distinction • Activities: • I am pushing a cart. • The act of pushing a cart doesn’t imply any necessary endpoint. • Accomplishment: • I am drawing a circle. • Act of drawing a circle does imply an endpoint (when the circle is done)

  21. The activity/accomplishment distinction John was pushing a cart. • Test 1: • Q: For how long did John push the cart? • perfectly legitimate question, focuses on the time the activity took • Q: How long did it take to push the cart? • strange question, focuses on the end-point of the activity, which is not implied by the sentence • NB: question becomes OK if our sentence is John was pushing a cart to the village. The direct object makes it an accomplishment. • Test 2: • If John stopped pushing the cart after some time, can we say that the sentence is still true? • Yes.

  22. The activity/accomplishment distinction John was running a mile. • Test 1: • Q: For how long did John run a mile? • strange question, focuses on the time the activity took • Q: How long did it take to run a mile? • legitimate question, focuses on the end-point of the activity, which is implied by the sentence • Test 2: • If John stopped running a mile after some time, can we say that the sentence is still true? • No. The sentence is only true if John finished running a mile.

  23. The activity/accomplishment distinction • One of the ways this is reflected in language has to do with durative adverbials • sentences describing activities can have a durative adverbial • John pushed the cart for an hour • sentences describing accomplishments are often odd with a durative • ?John ran a mile for an hour

  24. Correlation with the semantic distinction • Activities: durative, atelic • push a cart • Accomplishment: durative, telic • run a mile • Interaction with grammatical context: • John pushed a cart. (activity, atelic) • John pushed a cart to the village. (accomplishment, telic)

  25. Achievements • Vendler’s achievements are not processes but events • typically described by non-durative, telic verbs • recognise, find, stop • Compare: • I recognised Bill. • ?I recognised Bill for an hour. • durative adverbial gives rise to an odd sentence • just like accomplishments • different in that the situation described is understood to take place instantaneously

  26. Summary of situation types

  27. Summary • Different types of situations are encoded differently, depending on: • whether they are conceived as holistic events or processes with internal structure • whether they are long-term states • whether they are know to have endpoints • Different verbs are suited to different types of situations depending on: • telicity • durativitity • stativity

More Related