1 / 22

Performance Testing Lead-Acid Stationary Batteries; Myths, Misunderstandings and Mistakes

Performance Testing Lead-Acid Stationary Batteries; Myths, Misunderstandings and Mistakes Rick Tressler Sr. Training Engineer Alber. IEEE PES Energy Storage & Stationary Battery Committee Sunday Technical Sessions June 12, 2016. Presentation Topics. Myths

caesar
Download Presentation

Performance Testing Lead-Acid Stationary Batteries; Myths, Misunderstandings and Mistakes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performance Testing Lead-Acid Stationary Batteries; Myths, Misunderstandings andMistakes Rick Tressler Sr. Training Engineer Alber IEEE PES Energy Storage & Stationary Battery Committee Sunday Technical Sessions June 12, 2016

  2. Presentation Topics • Myths • Negative effects of performance testing • Equalizing a VLA battery before a test • Equalizing a VRLA battery prior to a performance test • Misunderstandings that Lead to Mistakes • Test termination at 100% capacity • Failure to bypass weak cells • Load bank cable sizing • Test termination at first cell final voltage • High rates on small connectors

  3. Myths

  4. Myth #1 • Performance testing ruins a battery • A lead calcium, flat plate, 1.215 S.G. battery can deliver about 50 cycles to 80% DOD when tested at the 5 hour rate to 1.75 VPC • IEEE based testing results in about 6 cycles to about 50% DOD • Test at 1 to 2 hour rate at the corresponding higher current instead

  5. Myth #1 (continued) • Example test schedule • Test #1 Acceptance test at installation • Test #2 Performance test within 2 years of installation – weeds out early failures • Tests #3-5 Performance test at 5 year intervals (20 year expected service life) • Test #6 Begin testing annually until reaching 80% rated capacity

  6. Myth #2 • Always equalize a VLA battery before a test • What kind of test? • It’s appropriate prior to Acceptance tests • Equalize charging when new is termed Initial, Commissioning or Freshening charge • No less than 3 days but not longer than 30 days on float prior to testing after completing charge

  7. Myth #2 (continued) • Performance testing? • Do not equalize unless the intent is to baseline/benchmark capacity (Acceptance test) • Usually performed to reflect maintenance practices • Batteries do not get equalized before an emergency outage occurs

  8. Myth #2 (continued) • The elusive “72 hour” equalize before a test rule • Where did it come from? • Probably the result of some urban battery legend • Equalize a battery for 72 hours, regardless of type, size, application, then run a test – NO! • There is no one-size-fits-all equalize procedure

  9. Myth #2 (continued) • Table clearly indicates the equalize time varies widely

  10. Myth #3 • Equalize VRLA batteries prior to a Performance test • This should not be conducted unless specifically indicated by the battery manufacturer • Generally part of the commissioningprocedure only

  11. Misunderstandings

  12. Misunderstanding #1 • Terminating a Performance Test When Battery Capacity Reaches 100% • Example 58 cell battery • Published time -1 hour rate • Published final voltage – 1.75 VPC • Battery final voltage should be 101.5 V

  13. Misunderstanding #1 (continued) Oops! Should be 101.5

  14. Misunderstanding #2 • Failure to bypass weak cells • Testing with a failed cell in the circuit prior to 90%-95% of expected time can skew test results • Before 90%, discontinue or pause the test, bypass the cell, then resume

  15. Misunderstanding #2 (continued) • Cell failure occurs later than 90%-95%? • Continue the testing to the specified final battery voltage • Caveats • Bypassing cells is allowed once during a test • Maximum downtime to be not longer than 10% of test time or 6 minutes, whichever is shorter

  16. Misunderstanding #3 • Failure to Correctly Size Load Bank Cables • Voltage drop must be considered when load banks are being operated near or at full load rating • May not be able to achieve required load current • Cable overheating also a concern

  17. Misunderstanding #3 (continued) • Example • Cable Size (CM) = 12.9 × loop conductor × load ÷ max drop • 12.9 × 100 × 450 amperes ÷ 3.0 v • Cable size = 193,500 CM (4/0 cable, 211,600 CM) – 1 conductor per polarity recommended

  18. Misunderstanding #4 • Terminating a Test When the First Cell Reaches Final Voltage • Such action renders the test invalid • Test termination criteria is the point in the test when overall battery voltage occurs, not when the first cell reaches the average end-of-discharge voltage

  19. Misunderstanding #4 (continued) • Cell voltages vary during discharge • Perfect uniformity is not achievable • There is always cell voltage variation

  20. Misunderstanding #5 • High Test Currents with Small Intercell Connectors • 8 hour battery tested at the 1 to 2 hour rate • Exercise caution; avoid excessive voltage drop and possible overheating of connectors • Consult battery manufacturer if in doubt • Do no harm to the battery

  21. Summary • Testing requires a good understanding of batteries • Proper technician training is essential • An understanding of the applicable IEEE recommended practice should be more than casual • Maintain copies of current standards in your digital library • Documented procedures are extremely useful • Seek answers to questions before testing • Be prepared for the unexpected

  22. Performance Testing Lead-Acid Stationary Batteries; Myths, Misunderstandings andMistakes Rick Tressler Sr. Training Engineer Alber IEEE PES Energy Storage & Stationary Battery Committee Sunday Technical Sessions June 12, 2016

More Related