1 / 29

United States Military Space Systems – The Road Ahead

United States Military Space Systems – The Road Ahead. Matthew Hoey, Research Associate The Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies. MILITARY SPACE SYSTEMS Current and Future Industry and Government Drivers THE PLAYERS BEHIND THE PROJECTS. The Industry and the Paradigm Shift.

cadee
Download Presentation

United States Military Space Systems – The Road Ahead

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. United States Military Space Systems – The Road Ahead Matthew Hoey, Research Associate The Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies

  2. MILITARY SPACE SYSTEMS Current and Future Industry and Government Drivers THE PLAYERS BEHIND THE PROJECTS

  3. The Industry and the Paradigm Shift Missile defense and space systems contracts have long been monopolized by the “Big 6” in the space systems Industry… This is no longer the case and affordability is the catalyst driving industry realignment – while allowing the US government to pursue more military space projects than ever before

  4. The “Emerging” Industry Leaders The monopoly of the present is slipping into the past – in the world of space systems new leaders are emerging. Launch Services Space Asset Protection Small Satellites Asset Maintenance

  5. Government Side Developers The government development of military space systems are being accelerated thanks in part to partnerships that effectively blur the line between weapons research and commercial applications NOT TO MENTION UNIVERSITY-BASED RESEARCH TEAMS

  6. FORCE TRANSFORMATION & OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE (ORS) A PUSH TOWARDS SPACE SUPERIORITY AND THE FIRST STEPS TO WEAPONIZATION - ACCELERATED

  7. Office of Force Transformation Objectives • Development: Time required to design, build, and test spacecraft hardware • Currently 2 to 10+ years • To counter adversary’s changing tactics warfighting capabilities must be developed within 6-9 months • Deployment: Time required to integrate, launch, and deliver space systems • Currently 3 to 12+ months • Space-based assets must be in place and ready for operation within hours of a request for support • Operate: Time required to deliver a systems products or effects • Current timelines depend on system and mission it is typically hours to days • Under ORS space system operations must respond in timelines consistent with battlefield operations (continuous/seconds)

  8. Next generation expendable launch vehicles Reduce launch to orbit cost by 5 to 10X 810lbs into LEO for $4.2 million On 8 HOURS notice Microcosm will be offering this service in 24 months What are the implications? Affordable launch services + Small Sats Funding provided primarily by the Air Force, Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO), NASA, and Microcosm internal R&D.

  9. The ESPA Ring ESPA COMPATABILITY WILL BE THE STANDARD DEPLOYMENT PLATFORM FOR THE SMALL SATELLITE INDUSTRY The ESPA is a structure developed by the Air Force Research Labs (AFRL) and the Space Test Program (STP) as a means to deploy small satellites. ESPA is currently only compatible with the Atlas V or the Delta IV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle or EELV and in time the ESPA ring may be incorporated into more affordable next generation EELV launch options – further reducing the cost of space weaponization and commercial space systems development.

  10. How fast is small satellite technology moving? - NOTE THE FLUCTUATION IN WEIGHT and DEFINITIONS

  11. SMALL SATELLITE COMPANIES AND SYSTEMS

  12. Company Profile ESCORT INSPECTION MICROSATELLITE ESCORT APPLICATIONS Monitor space around a large satellite to detect attacks. Stealthily inspect and monitor a large satellite to determine its capabilities. Stealthily attack to permanently or temporarily disable a large satellite. Actively defend a large satellite against attacks by microsatellites.

  13. Company Profile Key Technologies Maneuvering and orbital Transfer Vehicle (MoTV) SpaceDev MoTV Classes There are three size classes of MoTV, designated as -1, -2, -3: "-1" is up to 50 kg (MoTV-1) "-2" is up to 100 kg (MoTV-2) "-3" is up to 200 kg (MoTV-3) KEY USES Proximity Operations Rendezvous Inspection Surveillance Protection Cosmic Hot Insterstellar Plasma Spectrometer Satellite (CHIPSat) 100% TCP-IP What does that mean? This is command and control

  14. REDOCKING CUBESATS Imagine, a host docking satellite with multiple cubesats no larger than 10 inches on any given side able to place for instance, a black swath of adhesive material over a satellite lens or solar array – then removed once the objective has been met. Key components of stealth attack is an attack that duplicates natural phenomenon or is reversible

  15. The Experimental Satellite Series XSS-11 Launched April 2005 XSS-10 Launched January 2003 Rendezvous Interdiction Inspection

  16. Demonstration of Autonomous Rendezvous Technology (DART) • The DART will approach the target satellite and perform a series of proximity operations including: • Station keeping • Docking axis approach Circumnavigation. • Collision avoidance the maneuver then depart the vicinity and transition to its final orbit. • The entire sequence will be accomplished under autonomous control.

  17. Orbital Express • Orbital Express will extend the life of Satellites by providing: • A refueling capability • On-orbit refueling • Improve survivability “In addition, ORBITAL EXPRESS can support deployment and operations of micro-satellites for missions such as space asset protection and sparse aperture formation flying, or deploy nano-satellites for inspection to provide data to support satellite repair.” DARPA Broad range of uses ranging from US national security applications to commercial space programs.

  18. WHAT NEXT?

  19. With such a capability is there a possibility of an operable ASAT system on the horizon? Without clearly defined rules and limitations - YES

  20. What are the implications an eventual ASAT system being operational? For hundred of years blockades were used to compromise the economies and military capabilities of enemy states. In Iraq air strikes on critical infrastructure like electrical grids were common place and economic sanctions were the means of limiting a nations economy - this is still the way, for now. But as we move forward technologically and economies become more reliant on satellites - Stock exchanges, communications, banking… And militaries rely more on space without rules – space asset protection will be needed and the ability to inflict damage similar to economic sanctions can be done without UN consensus and instead achieved via taking out a single satellite. Space based sanctions, embargos and blockades – not to mention removing the eyes and ears of a military by taking down their space systems

  21. The marriage of cutting edge technologies • Hypersonic air breathing launch vehicles • Launch on demand at 5x the speed of sound • Next generation small satellites • capable of direct engagement, asset protection and stealth attack • ESPA ring technology • An ability to deploy multiple small satellites

  22. Global Presence

  23. OTHER SPACE SYSTEMS

  24. Technologies in Development • Direct Engagement Anti-Satellite (ASAT) • Ground-based kinetic energy ASAT (KEASAT) • “Killer” Micro and nanosatellites • The Experimental Satellite Series (XSS) • Near field infrared experiment (NFIRE) • Air-Launched Miniature Vehicle (ALMV) • Air Launched Anti-Satellite Missile • Maneuvering and Orbital Transfer Vehicle (MoTV) • Radio Frequency (ASAT) • Counter Satellite Communications System • Space-Based Radio Frequency Energy Weapon • Counter Communications System (CCS) • Space-Based Radio Frequency Energy Weapon • Satellite Identification Systems • Rapid Attack Identification, Detection and Reporting System (RAIDRS) • Counter Surveillance and Reconnaissance System (CSRS) • Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs)—Lasers • Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser (MIRACL) • Ground Based Laser • Limited Space-Based Lasers Incorporating Mirror Constellations • Space Based Laser Constellations • hydrogen fluoride chemical lasers • deuterium fluoride lasers • chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL) • Joint High Power Solid State Laser Program • Evolutionary Air and Space Global Laser Engagement Airship Relay Mirrors Space Based Vehicles and Interceptors Orbital Transfer Vehicle Space Operations Vehicle Hypervelocity Rod Bundles Artificial Meteoroids/Spheres Space Maneuver Vehicle (SMV X-40) Common Aero Vehicle (CAV X-41) Space-Based Interceptor Test Bed (MKV) Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle (HCV) Falcon Electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons Information Operations (IO) and Network Warfare Operations The computer driven means for corrupting space-based and terrestrial-based computer systems which manage satellite functions. C4ISR Systems Early warning and surveillance systems, satellites, radar, identification systems, communications systems, ground-, air- and space-based sensors to support target assessment efforts and intelligence gather efforts on rival space capabilities. NOT INCLUDING MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES

  25. The BMD – Space Systems connection • • Effective and affordable solution to the emerging midcourse threat • • Destroys multiple credible objects – both lethal threats and decoys • • Dramatically reduces threat leakage • • Integrated with all Ballistic Missile Defense System assets • • Adaptable to multiple basing options Terrestrial based and integrated into the current ground based systems – up to 7 interceptors - by FY’07

  26. The Common Aero Vehicle Capabilities enabled by responsive spacelift • Strike targets anywhere from CONUS in 120 minutes or less. • Increased warfighting capability against hard and deeply buried targets. • Minimizes over flight and landing issues and concerns. • Avoids risk to flight crews • Relatively invulnerable to anti-access threats. • Cost competitive with other platforms Approx. Performance Requirements • Precision strike • Variety of conventional payloads • In-flight target updates • Worldwide, all weather range Project FALCON

  27. Space Insertion and Extraction Evolutionary Improvements to Conventional Assault Support Space Insertion-Terrestrial Extraction Stealthy, Survivable Transport of 13 Troops & Equipment Launch on Demand Unrefueled transport No overflight restrictions “the idea is to move a squad-sized unit of Marines to any place on Earth in less than two hours.” Marine BGen Richard C Zilmer

  28. SMARTBus Satellite Systems Referred to as the 6 DAY satellite – Ultimate objective: To be assembled and deployed in the field for on demand intelligence, communications, imaging… PLUS – SENSE - PLAY

  29. FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT WWW.IDDS.ORG AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE ARMS CONTROL REPORTER

More Related