Identifying accessing and using data on native american children
Download
1 / 30

Identifying, Accessing and Using Data on Native American Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 124 Views
  • Uploaded on

Identifying, Accessing and Using Data on Native American Children. James F. Mensing, J.D., Ph.D. Senior Research Analyst Judicial Council of California Administrative Office of the Courts Center for Families, Children & the Courts San Francisco, CA. Nicole Sieminski, J.D.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Identifying, Accessing and Using Data on Native American Children' - cachet


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Identifying accessing and using data on native american children

Identifying, Accessing and Using Data on Native American Children

James F. Mensing, J.D., Ph.D.

Senior Research Analyst

Judicial Council of California

Administrative Office of the Courts

Center for Families, Children & the Courts

San Francisco, CA

Nicole Sieminski, J.D.

Researcher Specialist

American Indian Studies Center

University of California, Los Angeles

Association for Criminal Justice ResearchSacramento, California March 17 – 18, 2011


Overview of presentation
Overview of Presentation Children

Introductions

Summary of UCLA National Institute of Justice Project – A Study of the Administration of Criminal Justice in Indian Country

Summary of Native American Community Justice Project (NACJP)

Outcome of NACJP: California Tribally Specific Data Investigation

One Area of Focus: Indian Child Welfare Data and CMS/CWS

Group Discussion of Availability of Tribally Specific Data



Indian country s maze of jurisdiction
Indian Country’s “Maze” of Jurisdiction Children

  • Non-PL280

    • Tribe and feds share jurisdiction over major crimes by Indians and over Indian-against-non-Indian crimes

    • Tribes have exclusive jurisdiction over non-major crimes committed by Indians against Indians

    • States or feds have jurisdiction over non-Indians, depending on whether victim is Indian or non-Indian

  • PL280 (or like statute)

    • Tribe shares jurisdiction over Indians with state

    • State has sole jurisdiction over non-Indians

    • Special situation in Alaska, where state has more jurisdiction because of limited Indian country


Ucla nij project framework
UCLA NIJ Project Framework Children

  • Model 1 NON-PL 280 – All Tribal (court, police & jail)

  • Model 2 NON-PL 280 – All Tribal, contract jail

  • Model 3 NON-PL 280 – All BIA

  • Model 4 NON-PL 280 – Mixed (tribal except jail)

  • Model 5 NON-PL 280 – Mixed (BIA except court)

  • Model 6 NON-PL 280 – Mixed (tribal except police)

  • Model 7 PL 280 – All State (court, police & jail)

  • Model 8 PL 280 – Concurrent (all tribal but may contract jail)

  • Model 9 Alaska – All state except no longer burdened by PL280

  • Model 10 Partial PL 280 (ALL the Idaho tribes, Salish-Kootenai of MT, and all of the WA tribes EXCEPT Muckleshoot, Nisqually, Skokomish, and Squaxin Island)

  • Model 11 Mixed – CFR courts enforcing CFR codes but tribal police (Wyandotte)


Data questions
Data Questions Children

Number of repeat offenders

Number of tribal members admitted to jail facilities

Crime/victimization rates

Number of arrests for Indian country-based offenses

Number of criminal prosecutions for Indian country-based offenses

Percentage of defendants released on bail or their own recognizance

Approximate rate of pre-trial release violation

Conviction rates for criminal cases involving Indian country-based offenses

Percentage of convicted defendants sentenced to incarceration, fines, community service, treatment

Number of tribal convictions resulting in habeas corpus petitions

Recidivism rates for Indian inmates in tribal and nontribal facilities

Percentage of Indian defendants who plead guilty or plea bargain

Number of reported Part I violent crime incidents

Number of major felony cases reported, number of major felony cases closed


Roadblocks to data collection
Roadblocks to Data Collection Children

Tribal Approval

Accessibility

Format

Incomplete

Unwillingness to share


California native american communities justice project dialogue on family violence
California Native American Communities Justice Project: Dialogue on Family Violence

  • Full Reports:

    • Policy Paper (PDF)

    • Research Report (PDF)

  • Definition of Family Violence

    • Sexual Assault

    • Domestic Violence

    • Stalking

    • Teen Dating Violence

    • Elder Abuse

      Little data or information exists

      on these issues


Methodology
Methodology Dialogue on Family Violence

Strategic Approach respecting tribal sovereignty

  • Letter to Chairs of Federally and Non-federally Recognized Tribes seeking recommendation for tribal consultant

  • Consultants hired were Tribes’ first or second consultant choice

  • Outreach to urban Indians in San Francisco and Los Angeles areas

  • Updated all Tribes in California through updated Fact Sheet

  • Planning Meeting invitation to participants of local community meetings and Tribes


Community meetings
Community Meetings Dialogue on Family Violence

  • 17 community meetings held

  • Over 250 California Native participants:

    • Service providers

    • Advocates

    • Tribal Leaders

    • Elders

    • Interested Community Members

    • Victim/Survivors


Community meetings1
Community Meetings Dialogue on Family Violence

Federally Recognized Tribes

Non-Federally Recognized Tribes

Urban Community Meetings

Facilitator guided

Open ended questions

Notes taken

Survey filled out by most participants


Themes from community meetings
Themes from Community Meetings Dialogue on Family Violence

1: Crime Statistics and Family Violence Data

2: Reporting Family Violence and Treatment of Native Americans

3: Services

4: Restraining Orders

5: State Courts

6: Tribal Courts and Police

7: Community—Level Concerns


Other themes from community meetings
Other Themes from Community Meetings Dialogue on Family Violence

Violence Against Men

Youth and Violence

Domestic Violence/Family Violence Definitions

Systemic Problems

AND

Lack of Data….

Tribal Law and Policy Institute


Dearth of data theme from meetings
Dearth of Data Theme from Meetings Dialogue on Family Violence

Discussion Question: What sources of data exist (or should exist) to document the problems?

  • Data collection is directly related to securing funding.

  • Some data is not accurate.

  • Reports often come “through the grapevine.”

  • Underreporting is a problem.


Dearth of data theme from meetings1
Dearth of Data Theme from Meetings Dialogue on Family Violence

  • Data is collected by outside agencies and organizations. The data is then used to obtain money and other resources that are not shared with tribal/Native American people. Giving back the data to the tribes and communities from which it was collected is a crucial issue.

  • Data is sometimes collected from different sources. More information is needed on how to mine data and calculate data from different sources.

  • Any data collection or reporting should be mindful of confidentiality.


Dearth of data theme from survey
Dearth of Data Theme from Survey Dialogue on Family Violence


Promising data practices identified
Promising Data Practices Identified Dialogue on Family Violence

  • Cooperation

    • Cooperative efforts with the county and the tribe/Native American community to collect data.

  • Coordination

    • Recognize and standardize reporting for different sources to make data mining easier.

  • Capacity

    • Tribe needs funding for a full-time salaried employee to mine data from all sources.


Why tribally specific data
Why Dialogue on Family ViolenceTribally Specific Data?

  • Obstacle to implementing change: Lack of tribally specific data to document the problem

  • AI/AN data exists, but over 500 tribes have very different circumstances

    • State level data is better, but often not sufficient

  • Requests for Proposals (RFPs) require tribally specific data

  • Respect for Tribal Sovereignty requires each tribe to be treated as a separate sovereign entity


Tribally specific data investigation
Tribally Specific Data Investigation Dialogue on Family Violence

  • Initital Goals

    • Data Stakeholders Meeting

    • Data Investigation

    • Data Availability Report

    • Data Availability Grid

  • Additional Tasks Identified

    • Annotated Bibliography of Reports

    • Virtual Native California Data Community


Types of tribally specific data prioritized
Types of Tribally Specific Data Prioritized Dialogue on Family Violence

Juvenile Dependency

Elder Abuse

Violence Against Women

Juvenile Delinquency

General Crime

General Health

Child Custody and Support

Demographic

DMV

TANF


Juvenile dependency indian child welfare data
Juvenile Dependency/Indian Child Welfare Data Dialogue on Family Violence

  • Familiarity with ICWA . . .

  • CMS/CWS data

    • State and local social service departments

    • BIA federal and regional offices

    • Drop down list of federally recognized tribes for local caseworkers


Availability of data in cms cws systems
Availability of Data in CMS/CWS Systems Dialogue on Family Violence

  • AI/AN children may be identified in two places:

    • Through ethnicity

    • Through ICWA eligibility

  • Tribal affiliation may be entered if known at initial intake

  • Tribal affiliation may not be entered if learned at later date through ICWA or other investigation

  • Data on known tribal affiliations exists at both county and state levels


Availability of data in cms cws systems1
Availability of Data in CMS/CWS Systems Dialogue on Family Violence

Data is not available through public website because of reliability and confidentiality concerns

Data can be requested through special ad hoc reports from state social services


California court case management system
California Court Case Management System Dialogue on Family Violence

Juvenile, Family, and Probate cases

Case participant by federally recognized tribe or historical identity

Track noticing information under ICWA

View ICWA status of case participant


Washington state model
Washington State Model Dialogue on Family Violence

Indian Unit within Department of Social Services

State/tribal data sharing agreements

All tribes in state are part of data sharing agreement

Data used for funding primarily


Discussion
Discussion . . . Dialogue on Family Violence

  • Is Tribally Specific Child Welfare Data Available in your organization?

    • If so, how is it made available?

    • If not, would this be useful?

    • How might it happen?


Thank you ! Dialogue on Family ViolenceFor more information, contact:James MensingSenior Research Analyst, [email protected] SieminskiResearch SpecialistUCLA American Indian Studies [email protected]


ad