1 / 61

Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, August 23, 2006

Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, August 23, 2006. Mark-Up Draft 1 As tabled from July 19. Documents – frankfortonline.org. Draft 1 – July 12, 2006. TOC [Table of Contents] – 10 parts some rearrangement for Draft 2. PART I. Introduction TOC Executive Summary

butch
Download Presentation

Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, August 23, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Frankfort City Comprehensive PlanMeeting, August 23, 2006 Mark-Up Draft 1 As tabled from July 19

  2. Documents – frankfortonline.org

  3. Draft 1 – July 12, 2006

  4. TOC [Table of Contents] – 10 parts some rearrangement for Draft 2 • PART I. Introduction • TOC • Executive Summary • Updating the Comprehensive Plan • State mandate • Time Period • Vision Statement • Planning Process • Acknowledgements Reorganized

  5. PART II. Community Profile A. Location B. Climate C. History D. Demographic Analysis, Forecasts & Comparisons 1. Age Cohorts 2. Race 3. Ethnicity 4. Education 5. Forecasts A. Frankfort City past 20 years B. Frankfort City past 10 years C. Frankfort City past 3 years D. Clinton County past 10 years E. Hamilton County past 10 years F. Lebanon City, Boone County past 3 years G. Lafayette City, Tippecanoe County past 3 years H. Cohort Survival [basis: fertility rates, mortality rates, net migration] E. Socioeconomic Analysis, Forecasts & Comparisons 1. Labor Force 2. Employment 3. Household Income 4. Income by Industry New to Draft 2

  6. PART III. Growth Management Managing Sprawl Brought by New Development Common Sense Zoning Infrastructure Placement Farming Community Identification Enhanced Tax Base Community Identification Growth Pattern [East or West?] Land Use A. Agricultural b. Residential 1. Core Residential 2. Traditional Residential 3. Multifamily Residential C. Downtown d. Commercial 1. Neighborhood Commercial 2. Community Commercial 3. Regional Commercial e. Industrial 1. Light Industrial 2. Manufacturing 3. High-Tech R&D F. Public Uses Institutional Planned Development Planned Unit Planned Residential Planned Commercial Planned Industrial Future Land Use Map Zoning Map SR 28 West Overlay District Map Existing Land Use Map Downtown Land Use Map Industrial Park Land Use Map New to Draft 2

  7. PART IV. Placemaking Vision A. Neighborhood Identification B. Reutilization of Downtown C. Managing Sprawl Brought by New Development PART V. Community Living A. Abandoned Schools B. Neighborhood Living C. Zoning Enforcement D. Community Cohesiveness PART VI. Community Green A. Class Three Wind Availability B. Landfill Capacity C. Frankfort Association of Community Trails (FACT) D. Landscaping Ordinance/Storm-water Ordinance PART VII. City Beautiful Vision A. Tree City Program B. Utility Lines C. Abandoned Big-Box D. Adopt an Entrance PART VIII. Economic Revitalization Economic Analysis Economic Condition Economic Base Industry Clusters [Agglomeration Effect] Analysis of Demand Analysis of the Factors of Production Economic Performance Growth/ Decline of Economic Indicators Shift-Share Analysis Overall Economic Development Strategy Economic Revitalization Projects Brownfield Redevelopment Downtown Revitalization SR 28 Corridor – Redesign & Adaptive Reuse Economic Development Housing Eco-Industrial Park Bio-Refinery Industry New to Draft 2

  8. PART IX. Access A. Emergency Management B. Public Transportation C. Alternative Transportation D. Downtown Vehicular Flow Thoroughfare Plan Context Sensitive Design Street hierarchy 1. Arterial streets 2. Collector streets 3. Local streets Regional Thoroughfare Plan PURPOSE GOALS National Highway System PART X. Summary Conclusions A. Problems, Goals & Objectives B. Strategies, Projects & Policies C. Call for Planning & Development 1. Community Development Plans 2. Economic Development Task Force 3. Strategic Alliances and Corporate Sponsors 4. Legislation TOC - End New to Draft 2

  9. Draft 2 Major Elements added to Draft 1

  10. Draft 3 as Final Draft • Adobe InDesign replaces MS Word • Very reader-friendly • More graphical • Expanded pages • All corrections from Draft 2 from 9-16-06 • Opportunity for detail mark-up by public officials that are consistent with 9-16-06 resolutions of stakeholders

  11. Schedule as Revised

  12. PART X: Summary Conclusions • Refer to document [16 pp.] • Note Well Hispanic 7-point program relevant to Spanish-speaking minority population [pp. 14-16]

  13. 7-Points – Spanish-Speaking Communities of Frankfort • English education for adults; bi-lingual support through key governmental operations until the success of English education • Subsidized or free legal services in landlord-tenant relations, perhaps taking the form of arbitration or mediation resolutions. • Active recreational [soccer, baseball] and cultural programs aimed at the needs of Hispanic people. The acquisition and conversion of Kyger ES and the defunct Wal-Mart as a public facility for community meeting, recreation, health care, and cultural/ art exhibitions and workshops, but inclusive of Hispanic needs, should be explored. • Seek the cooperation of existing lenders to extend credit to Hispanic households and businesses; counseling of Hispanic households and businesses in the establishment of credit, in housing management, and in business management akin to the programs of La Plaza in the Indianapolis metropolitan area; if necessary, establish Hispanic-oriented credit unions, SBA Certified Development Corporations and other institutions to finance the projects of Hispanic households and businesses. • Establishment within the City of an Ombudsperson Office to advocate for the needs, objectives and projects of various citizens, community associations and businesses. That advocacy includes an active grants procurement operation involving intergovernmental aid, and aid to private organizations, households and businesses.[1] Further, the ombudsperson may assist in procuring local programs and other resources, and in recommending to the Mayor and Council measures to remediate the problems faced by ordinary citizens and organizations. • As a multicultural bridge to establish social, recreational and cultural events that combine the Anglo and Hispanic communities of Frankfort. These events recognize the positive impact of the annual summer downtown festival in Frankfort revolving on multicultural food, entertainment and merchandizing. • Continued education and organization of Hispanic communities politically and socially in addressing these indigenous needs, toward the common good of the City, and with the aim of integrating Hispanic peoples in their multicultural neighborhoods and city. • [1] grants/ subsidies/ low cost lending, credit enhancement, etc.through public agencies and corporate foundations; available through “Resources for Indiana Communities In Housing, Community & Economic Development,” a publication of the Indiana City Corporation

  14. Findings by ICC Spanish-Speaking Staff • Saddened by absence of integration, and quite self-deprecating • “Hispanic and Anglo people don’t share the use of public spaces. When Hispanics arrive, the Anglos leave.” • Fatalistic [“nothing will change to make our lives better”] • “afraid” • Emphasis on social service needs [contrast to stakeholder interests] • Legal services • Health care • Family counseling/ abuse/ day care • Financial counseling • Public transportation • More and better jobs [‘like Lebanon”]

  15. Population Forecasting • Based on Alternate Assumptions of Change Past 20 Years 2025 • Frankfort 18,000 • Clinton [not Howard] County 16,200 • Lebanon 20,400 • Lafayette 21,500 • Hamilton County 36,800

  16. Frankfort Current Population Maps Key Current Population Population Growth (1=10) Population Decline (1=10)

  17. Frankfort Population 2010 • Population drops by 227

  18. Frankfort Population 2015 • Population grows by 2,352

  19. Frankfort Population 2025 • Population drop by 506

  20. Frankfort Population 2010 • Population remains the same

  21. Frankfort Population 2015 • Population grows by 838

  22. Frankfort Population 2025 • Population drops by 1,206

  23. Frankfort Population 2010 • Population grows by 475

  24. Frankfort Population 2015 • Population grows by 2,472

  25. Frankfort Population 2025 • Population grows by 1,020

  26. Frankfort Population 2010 • Population grows by 1,184

  27. Frankfort Population 2015 • Population grows by 3,559

  28. Frankfort Population 2025 • Population grows by 371

  29. Frankfort Population 2010 • Population grows by 5,210

  30. Frankfort Population 2015 • Population grows by 5,923

  31. Frankfort Population 2025 • Population grows by 9,042

  32. Graphics on ROW’s for Thoroughfare Plan + Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances • Residential Street + Feeder Street • ASHTO New Standards [adopted by NJ as RSIS] • Strictly subdivision streets • Small variance with the graphics to follow

  33. Local Residential Street Standards Residential Street

  34. Local Residential Street Standards Residential Feeder

  35. Local Resident Street Standards Access Street

  36. Local Non- Resident Street Standards Option A

  37. Local Non- Resident Street Standards Option B

  38. Local Non- Resident Street Standards Option C

  39. Local Non- Resident Street Standards Option D

  40. Neighborhood Collector Street Standards Option A

  41. Neighborhood Collector Street Standards Option B

  42. Major Collectors Option A

  43. Major Collectors Option B

  44. Major Collectors Option C

  45. Minor Arterials Option A

More Related