1 / 23

Taking A Systems Approach

Taking A Systems Approach. Lessons from ICRISAT Village-Level Studies for Livelihoods R Padmaja Sociologist, ICRISAT. The sustainable Livelihoods Framework. Slater, 2008. A sustainable livelihoods framework for SAT agriculture. Source: Rao et.al, 2005. ICRISAT Village-level Studies.

burian
Download Presentation

Taking A Systems Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Taking A Systems Approach Lessons from ICRISAT Village-Level Studies for Livelihoods R Padmaja Sociologist, ICRISAT

  2. The sustainable Livelihoods Framework Slater, 2008

  3. A sustainable livelihoods framework for SAT agriculture Source: Rao et.al, 2005

  4. ICRISAT Village-level Studies Kanzara Dokur Aurepalle Source: ICRISAT-VDSA Project, 2011

  5. Cropping patterns changed substantially

  6. Changes in Cropping Pattern - Aurepalle From castor and cereals to cotton Source: Bantilan and Deb, 2011

  7. Changes in Cropping Pattern - Dokur Paddy major crop, castor and pulses new crops Sorghum declined Source: Bantilan and Deb, 2011

  8. Changes in Cropping Pattern - Kanzara Sorghum declined, groundnut not grown anymore Cotton dominated until 2006, Soybean replaced cotton Source: Bantilan and Deb, 2011

  9. Sources of Income Sources of per capita Real Income (Rs 2009/10 equivalent): 1975 -2010 Dokur (2001-2010) Dokur (1975-1984) Kanzara(2001-2010) Kanzara(1975-1984)

  10. Source: Bantilan and Deb, 2011

  11. Implications Access to irrigation – investments in borewells (Aurepalle) – Diversification in agriculture Crop productivity has increased with the adoption of improved technologies Diversification of income sources and cropping pattern. Time allocation patterns of women and men have changed -

  12. Source: Alison, 2011

  13. Rise in income inequality

  14. Inequality in Income Trends in per capita Income (Rs. 2009-10 equivalents) and inequality in income: 1975 -2010 Aurepalle (1975-2010) Dokur (1975-2010) Kalman(1975-2010) Shirapur (1975-2010) Kinkheda (1975-2010) Kanzara(1975-2010)

  15. Trends in asset ownership by farmsize, 2009-10 Rs equivalent: 1975-2009-10 Source: Padmaja, 2012

  16. Severity of Poverty Trends in severity in poverty (Squared Poverty Gap): 1975 -2010 Severity of poverty decreased substantially in early 2000s than in 1975-1984 Severity of poverty increased in Dokur, Shirapur and Kinkheda in recent years

  17. Importance of formal and informal social networks

  18. Total number of ties by households, by transaction type, Dokur Source: Padmaja, 2012

  19. Location, knowledge and information - key for decision making- Kanzara The focal points in this process are the early adopters and innovators, neighbouring farmers and input dealers Source: Padmaja, 2011

  20. Sources of information by gender, Aurepalle Source: Padmaja, 2011

  21. Drivers of Change access to irrigation facilities adoption of modern technology better road connectivity and market linkages educated workforce diversity in economic activities and livelihood opportunities

  22. Drivers of Change Main engine for development in different villages • Aurepalle: diversification of ag. and growth of non-farm activity • Dokur: migration income • Kanzara: intensification of agriculture and technology adoption • Kinkheda: increase in farm productivity • Shirapur: diversification of crop production and economic activities (including industries) • Kalman: diversification of farm and non-farm activities • Amongst these villages, development in Kinkheda was relatively less due to lack of social capital and collective action.

  23. Thank you !

More Related