1 / 4

sTGC production and QA/QC database: first thoughts

Discover the lessons learned from the TGC experience and how sTGC's database differs. Explore the need for standard tools, a unique database for stock management, production, quality control, certification, and installation. Learn about the challenges of part management and how sTGC addresses them, as well as the desire for compatibility with sTGC-MM technology. Find out about the technology decisions to be made and the importance of a robust network for automated reports and access authorization hierarchy.

burgin
Download Presentation

sTGC production and QA/QC database: first thoughts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. sTGC production and QA/QCdatabase: first thoughts Daniel

  2. Lessons from TGC experience • One should use standard and widely spread tools • One should have one unique d/base for • Stock management • Production (the same one for all centers!) • Quality Control • Certification • Installation

  3. Why is sTGC different from TGC? • Part management is a real issue • For TGC, parts were produced at WIS only. As a result, the part management section of the database turned out to be useless • For sTGC, part production is spread over the labs: shipment, QA, etc… needs serious tracking • Canadian colleagues need detailed statements for their Tax Authority. • However, not the tool for finances… • QC can influence production in a tricky way • For TGC, only accept/reject • sTGC is more subtle; example : thickness pairing • We can’t afford different systems across labs • Compatibility sTGC-MM is desirable

  4. Technology • To be decided by experts. • New great tools on the (free) market • See David’s slides • However, do non-experts agree on the following ? • Data base running at CERN only • Human interface thru the WEB • Automated reports, etc… run at CERN. • No local copy, i.e. we rely on today’s network speed and reliability • Speed more than OK for human interface • >1 hour network disruptions are very infrequent. When one occurs, stop manual input to the data-base and resume when the network resumes • Some level of access authorization hierarchy (i.e. Weizmann regular people can’t enter data on behalf of Santiago, etc…)

More Related