1 / 33

UGC RAE 1999

UGC RAE 1999. Guidance Notes. 22 Jan 1999 on UGC Web. History. RAE1 1993 RAE2 1996 RAE3 1999. Immediate purpose. Funding = T + R But R is not everything ! Public accountability Induce improvements. Principles. Assess CC Aggregate individuals Based on output

Download Presentation

UGC RAE 1999

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UGC RAE 1999

  2. Guidance Notes • 22 Jan 1999 • on UGC Web

  3. History • RAE1 1993 • RAE2 1996 • RAE3 1999

  4. Immediate purpose • Funding = T + R But R is not everything ! • Public accountability • Induce improvements

  5. Principles • Assess CC • Aggregate individuals • Based on output • Threshold measurement

  6. New features 1. Broaden “research” 2. Emphasize not assessing individuals 3. Look for coherence: • institution • CC • individual

  7. 1. Broaden definition • Discovery • Integration • Application • Teaching Carnegie Foundation: Scholarship Reconsidered (1990)

  8. Discovery The scholarship of discovery, at its best, contributes not only to the stock of human knowledge but also to the intellectual climate of an institution. It is a scholarly investigation, closest to what is meant when academics speak of "research", that confronts the unknown and creates new knowledge.

  9. Discovery(cont’d) Not just the outcomes, but the process, and especially the passion, give meaning to the effort.

  10. Integration It is a serious, disciplined work that seeks to interpret, draw together and bring new insight to bear on original research. The scholarship is closely related to discovery. Such work is increasingly important as traditional disciplinary categories prove confining, forcing new topologies of knowledge.

  11. Integration (cont’d) This scholarship also means interpretation, fitting one's own research -- or the research of others -- into larger intellectual patterns. A variety of scholarly trends -- interdisciplinary, interpretive, integrative, are examples of scholarship of integration.

  12. Application It is a dynamic process of creating new intellectual understandings arising out of theory and practice. The term itself may be misleading if it suggests that knowledge is first "discovered" and then "applied". The process is in fact more dynamic; new intellectual understanding can arise out of vital interaction between theory and practice, and one renews the other.

  13. Teaching It is a process that transforms and extends knowledge while transmitting an intelligible account of knowledge to the learners.

  14. Distribution • Expect distribution of submissions to be reasonable given • nature of subject • role and mission (& strategy statement) • Scoring will be without regard to distribution

  15. Research index p= 100% xA / T T = number of academic staff in a cost centre (who meet certain criteria) in fte A = the number among these judged to have reached or surpassed the quality threshold, including fractional counts

  16. 2. De-emphasize individual • Will not use “active researcher” (AR) • “% of AR”  “research index” • Individual results will not be • kept • released • used More a matter of adopting less misleading nomneclature

  17. 3. Look for coherence • Institution --- strategy statement • CC --- Table 1 • Individual submissions --- Table 3

  18. Number who reach quality threshold 1. Submit 2. Assess

  19. 1. Submit • Period of assessment • What to submit • Definition of output • Number of items • Co-authors

  20. Period of assessment • 4 years • 1 Jan 95 --- 31 Dec 98

  21. What to submit • up to 5 best research output items within the period of assessment, + • if considered appropriate, one exceptional research output item outside assessment period.

  22. Output • innovation; AND • contribute to scholarship; AND • publicly accessible; AND • of interest to peers and generalizable. does not matter whether funded by the UGC

  23. Specifically • any publication, patent, artifact, etc., • published or made publicly available within the assessment period; or • not yet published, but officially accepted in that period • other output: e.g. drama, concert performance, video tape, computer software, buildings, creative work that can be evaluated

  24. Number of items • Quality, not quantity • May submit fewer than 5 • Can meet threshold on the basis of even one • In the majority of cases, a clear decision should be able to be made on the basis of 3

  25. Co-authors • Individuals are proxies for the CC • Need to form a view on the CC's involvement • Not a multiplier; if judged to have made significant intellectual contribution, not pro-rated or discounted

  26. 2. Assess • Panels • Quality threshold

  27. Quality threshold • Quality of output equates to an attainable level of excellence appropriate to the discipline in Hong Kong, and showing some evidence of international excellence. • Then to give special recognition for societal relevance, symbiosis with industry, commerce and government, and/or with local culture and society.

  28. Comparability • Each panel to translate general definition into more precise benchmarks • Strive for broad comparability across disciplines

  29. Attainable • international excellence • international vs local

  30. Holistic view • View submission as a whole, • Not score each item individually, not n/5. • Evaluate based on best 3

  31. Quality • Judged on own merits • Not on venue / category / language

  32. Results • No individually identifiable scores • Total score of CC to Head of the institution concerned • + sector-wide average and median (if not fewer than three institutions)

  33. Rectifying misconceptions "UGC requires every individual academic to produce 5 international journal papers"

More Related