1 / 54

Relativity Theory by Hajnal Andréka , István & Péter Németi

A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of. Relativity Theory by Hajnal Andréka , István & Péter Németi. Aims of our school. Analysis of the logical structure of R. Theory Base the theory on simple, unambiguous axioms with clear meanings Make Relativity Theory:

brosh
Download Presentation

Relativity Theory by Hajnal Andréka , István & Péter Németi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Logic Based Foundation and Analysis of Relativity Theoryby HajnalAndréka, István & Péter Németi Relativity Theory and Logic

  2. Aims of our school Relativity Theory and Logic • Analysis of the logical structure of R. Theory • Base the theory on simple, unambiguous axioms with clear meanings • Make Relativity Theory: • More transparent logically • Easier to understand and teach • Easier to change • Modular • Demystify Relativity Theory

  3. Aims of our school • R.T.’s as theories of First Order Logic S. R. G. R. Relativity Theory and Logic

  4. Language for specrel Bodies (test particles), Inertial Observers, Photons, Quantities, usual operations on it, Worldview B Q= number-line IOb Ph W 0 Relativity Theory and Logic

  5. Language for specrel W(m, t x y z, b) body “b” is present at coordinates “t x y z” for observer “m” m t b (worldline) x y Relativity Theory and Logic

  6. Axioms for specrel • AxField Usual properties of addition and multiplication on Q : Q is an ordered Euclidean field. • 1. ( Q , + , ∙ ) is a field in the sense of abstract algebra • (with 0 , + , 1 , / as derived operations) • 2. • 3. • Ordering derived: LogicColloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August 6 2009 Relativity Theory and Logic

  7. Axiomsforspecrel • AxPh For all inertial observers the speed of light is the same in all directions and is finite. In any direction it is possible to send out a photon. t Formalization: ph1 ph2 ph3 x y Relativity Theory and Logic

  8. Axiomsforspecrel • AxEv All inertial observers coordinatize the same events. m k t t b1 b1 b2 b2 Wk Wm x x y Formalization: y Relativity Theory and Logic

  9. Axioms for specrel • AxSelf An inertial observer sees himself as standing still at the origin. t m t = worldline of the observer Wm Formalization: x y Relativity Theory and Logic

  10. Axioms for Specrel • AxSymd Any two observers agree on the spatial distance between two events, if these two events are simultaneous for both of them, and |vm(ph)|=1. t m ph t k x x e1 Formalization: e2 y y is the event occurring at p in m’s worldview Relativity Theory and Logic

  11. Specrel SpecRel = {AxField, AxPh, AxEv, AxSelf, AxSymd} Theorems Thm1 Thm2 Thm3 Thm4 Thm5 SpecRel AxField AxPh AxEv AxSelf AxSymd Proofs … Relativity Theory and Logic

  12. Specrel • Thm1 • Thm2 Relativity Theory and Logic

  13. Specrel • Thm4 • No axioms of SpecRel is provable from the rest • Thm5 • SpecRelis complete with respect to Minkowskigeometries • (e.g. implies all the basic paradigmatic effects of Special Relativity - even quantitatively!) Relativity Theory and Logic • Thm3 • SpecRel is consistent

  14. Relativistic effects Thm8 vk(m) • Moving clocks get out of synchronism. Relativity Theory and Logic

  15. Moving clocks get out of synchronism • Thm8 (formalization of clock asynchronism) Assume SpecRel. Assume m,kϵIOband events e, e’ are simultaneous for m, (1) Assume e, e’ are separated in the direction of motion of m in k’s worldview, k m m v 1t xm e’ |v| e e e’ xk 1x xm yk Relativity Theory and Logic

  16. Moving clocks get out of syncronism Thought-experiment for proving relativity of simultaneity. Relativity Theory and Logic

  17. Moving clocks get out of syncronism Thought-experiment for proving relativity of simultaneity. Relativity Theory and Logic

  18. Moving clocks get out of syncronism Black Hole Wormhole Timewarp-theory LogicColloquium, Sofia, July 31 – August 6 2009 Relativity Theory and Logic

  19. Moving clocks slow down Moving spaceships shrink Relativistic effects Thm9 Relativity Theory and Logic

  20. Relativistic effects v = speed of spaceship Relativity Theory and Logic

  21. Worldview transformation wmk q p m k t t b1 b1 b2 evm evk b2 Wk Wm x x y y Relativity Theory and Logic

  22. specrel • Thm11 • The worldview transformations wmk are Lorentz transformations (composed perhaps with a translation). Relativity Theory and Logic

  23. specrel • New theory is coming: Relativity Theory and Logic Conceptual analysis of SR goes on … on our homepage

  24. Theory of Accelerated observers AccRel = SpecRel + AccObs. AccRel is stepping stone to GenRel via Einstein’s EP AccRel Accelerated Observers AccRel SpecRel GenRel S. R. G. R. Relativity Theory and Logic

  25. Language for accrel The same as for SpecRel. Recallthat Relativity Theory and Logic

  26. Language for accrel Cd(m) Cd(k) wmk m k t t b1 b1 evm evk b2 b2 Wk Wm x x y y World-view transformation Relativity Theory and Logic

  27. Axioms for accelerated observers kϵOb p mϵIOb Formalization: Let F be an affine mapping (definable). Relativity Theory and Logic AxCmv At each moment p of his worldline, the accelerated observer k “sees” (=coordinatizes) the nearby world for a short while as an inertial observer m does, i.e. “the linear approximation of wmk at p is the identity”.

  28. Axioms for accelerated observers t m k b2 t k b2 Wk Wm x x y Formalization: y Relativity Theory and Logic AxEv- If m “sees” k participate in an event, then k cannot deny it.

  29. Axioms for accelerated observers Relativity Theory and Logic • AxSelf- • The world-line of any observer is an open interval of the time-axis, in his own world-view • AxDif • The worldview transformations have linear approximations at each point of their domain (i.e. they are differentiable). • AxCont • Bounded definable nonempty subsets of Q have suprema. Here “definable” means “definable in the language of AccRel, parametrically”.

  30. Accrel AccRel = SpecRel + AxCmv + AxEv- + AxSelf - + AxDif +AxCont Theorems AccRel AxField AxPh AxEv AxSelf AxSymd AxCmv AxEv- AxSelf - AxDif AxCont Thm101 Thm102 Thm103 Thm104 … Proofs Relativity Theory and Logic

  31. Accrel IOb t1’ t1 Ob t t’ • Appeared: Found. Phys. 2006, Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., Székely, G. Relativity Theory and Logic Thm101

  32. Accrel Thm102 ak(m) • Acceleration causes slow time. Relativity Theory and Logic

  33. Accrel • Thm102 • I.e., clocks at the bottom of spaceship run slower than the ones at the nose of the spaceship, both according to nose and bottom (watching each other by radar). • Appeared: Logic for XXIth Century. 2007, Madarász, J. X., Németi, I., Székely, G. Relativity Theory and Logic

  34. Accelerating spacefleet Relativity Theory and Logic

  35. uniformly accelerated observers Relativity Theory and Logic

  36. uniformly accelerating spaceship outside view inside view Relativity Theory and Logic

  37. uniformly accelerating spaceship 2. Time runs slower at the rear of the ship, and faster at the nose of ship. Measured by radar: Relativity Theory and Logic

  38. Gravitiy causes slow time via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Relativity Theory and Logic

  39. Everyday use of relativity theory GPS Global Positioning System Relativistic Correction: 38 μs/day approx. 10 km/day -7 μs/day because of the speed of sat. approx. 4 km/s (14400 km/h) +45 μs/day because of gravity Relativity Theory and Logic

  40. Gravitiy causes slow time via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Relativity Theory and Logic

  41. Gravitiy causes slow time via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Relativity Theory and Logic

  42. Gravitiy causes slow time via Einstein’s Equivalence Principle Relativity Theory and Logic

  43. Breaking the Turing-barrier via GR Application of GR tologic Relativistic Hyper Computing Relativity Theory and Logic

  44. accrel • New theory is coming: Relativity Theory and Logic Conceptual analysis of AccRel goes on …on our homepage

  45. General relativity Einstein’s strong Principle of Relativity: “All observers are equivalent” (same laws of nature) Abolish different treatment of inertial and accelerated observers in the axioms G. R. Relativity Theory and Logic

  46. genrel AxSelf AxPh AxSymt AxEv AxSelf- AxPh- AxSymt- AxEv- AxCmv AxDif Relativity Theory and Logic Language of GenRel: the same as that of SpecRel. Recipe to obtain GenRel from AccRel: delete all axioms from AccRel mentioning IOb. But retain their IOb-free logical consequences.

  47. Axioms for Genrel mϵOb 1t’ 1t Relativity Theory and Logic AxPh- The velocity of photons an observer “meets” is 1 when they meet, and it is possible to send out a photon in each direction where the observer stands AxSym- Meeting observers see each other’s clocks slow down with the same rate

  48. genrel GenRel = AxField +AxPh-+AxEv-+ AxSelf- +AxSymt-+AxDif+AxCont Theorems Thm1001 Thm1002 Thm1003 GenRel AxField AxPh- AxEv- AxSelf-AxSymt- AxDif AxCont … Proofs Relativity Theory and Logic

  49. genrel M=Events k’ evk wk k Lp p Metric: wkm evm wm Manifold Relativity Theory and Logic • Thm1002 • GenRel is complete wrt Lorentz manifolds.

  50. Genrel Relativity Theory and Logic • HowtouseGenRel? Recover IOb’s by their properties In AccRel by the “twin paradox theorem” IOb’s are those observers who maximize wristwatch-time locally Recover LIFs

More Related