Direct observation abc analysis
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 7

Direct Observation – ABC Analysis PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Direct Observation – ABC Analysis. Compare and Contrast Indirect Assessment with ABC Assessment Discuss the Elements of the ABC Assessment Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages of the ABC. FBA Project Rosebud… In your professional life. Goals for Today. ABC Analysis.

Download Presentation

Direct Observation – ABC Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Direct Observation – ABC Analysis


Compare and Contrast Indirect Assessment with ABC Assessment

Discuss the Elements of the ABC Assessment

Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages of the ABC

FBA Project

Rosebud…

In your professional life

Goals for Today


ABC Analysis

  • Allows the teacher to record behaviors as they happen

    • Less possibility for inadvertent bias since problem behaviors are recorded

  • Easy to complete

  • Easy to analyze for patterns


Using an ABC Analysis


Disadvantages to ABC

  • It gets harder to do correctly the longer you do them

  • Needs to be completed in the moment for the most accuracy

  • Still might reflect the biases of the data collector


Summarizing Results

  • JUST THE FACTS!

  • Avoid explanatory fictions

  • Explain what “MIGHT” be influencing the data


For More Information

Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2009). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice-Hall.

Alter, P. J., Conroy, M. A., Mancil, G. R., & Haydon, T. (2008). A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(2), 200-219.

Asmus, J. M., Vollmer, T. R., & Borrero, J. C. (2002). Functional behavioral assessment: A school based model. Education and Treatment of Children, 25(1), 67-90.

Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.

Carr, E. G., Reeve, C. E., & Magito-McLaughlin, D. (1996). Contextual influences on problem behavior in people with developmental disabilities. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 403-424). Baltimore: Brookes.

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

English, C. L., & Anderson, C. M. (2006). Evaluation of the treatment utility of the analog functional analysis and the structured descriptive assessment. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(4), 212-229.

Hall, S. S. (2005). Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors. Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 514-526.

Stage, S. A., Jackson, H. G., Moscovitz, K., Erickson, M. J., Thurman, S. O., Jessee, W., et al. (2006). Using multimethod-multisource functional behavioral assessment for students with behavioral disabilities. School Psychology Review, 35(3), 451-471.


  • Login