1 / 25

Data Analysis Workshop

Data Analysis Workshop. Chuck Spiekerman (cspieker@u) Karl Kaiyala (kkaiyala@u). Course Outline. February 20 How to describe your study Choosing an Analysis method March 13 Student presentations of study designs and data-analysis plans March 20 Student presentations of data analyses.

Download Presentation

Data Analysis Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Data Analysis Workshop Chuck Spiekerman (cspieker@u) Karl Kaiyala (kkaiyala@u)

  2. Course Outline • February 20 • How to describe your study • Choosing an Analysis method • March 13 • Student presentations of study designs and data-analysis plans • March 20 • Student presentations of data analyses

  3. Describing your study • Next session (3/13) we are asking you to present a description of your planned study • The next few slides give an outline of suggested components of this description • Attention to all these components should help you (and/or a consultant) decide on appropriate methods of statistical analysis

  4. Study Design Description • Specific Aims (what?) • Background (why?) • Previous work (who?)* • Study methods (how?) • several components *optional for student presentations

  5. Specific Aims • Describe the scientific question(s) • Be specific and precise • Stick to the study at hand

  6. Background and Motivation • Relevance of this research • Existing knowledge • Identify gap this research will fill • Relate to specific aims • If part of a larger study, where does this study fit?

  7. Study Methods Components • Primary outcomes • Study population • Methods and procedures * • Data analysis plan *optional for student presentations

  8. Primary Outcomes • Precise definition of key measurement (individual data item) of interest • Justify why this outcome and not something else. • Relate to specific aim • Details of collection can be left to methods and procedures section

  9. Study population • How were the subjects selected? • Exclusion and inclusion criteria • Group classification? • Matching? • Randomization?

  10. Data analysis plan • Outline data analysis for each specific aim • Make clear which procedures are being used toward which aim • Usually some simple tables and plots should be sufficient • Keep it simple

  11. Forming an analysis plan Two important questions • What do you want to do/show? • What kind of data … • …will answer your question best? • … can you get? • … do you have?

  12. Types of data • Continuous • Differences between values have meaning, and are interpretable independent of the values themselves • E.g. difference between 8 and 9 basically the same as difference between 1 and 2. • Ordinal • Values have an order, but differences are not easily interpretable (e.g. good, fair, poor)

  13. Types of data (cont.) • Categorical • Values are descriptive but do not have any obvious ordering. E.g. tx A, tx B, tx C. • Binary, Dichotomous • Fancy names for categorical variables with only two possible values.

  14. Types of data (sampling) • one-sample • Refers to situation when values of interest all come from one group and will be compared to a known quantity (e.g. “change greater than zero”) • two-sample • When data are divided/sampled in two groups and observed values compared between groups.

  15. What do you want to do? • Show evidence of differences • Estimate population parameters • Demonstrate equivalence • Show evidence of association • Create/validate a predictive model • Assess agreement or reliability • Other?

  16. Showing evidence of differences • Standard hypothesis testing procedures, usually comparing means or proportions • Which test will depend on type of data. Usual suspects (YMMV) • T-test or ANOVA for Continuous data • Chi-square test for Categorical data • Rank-based tests (e.g. Wilcoxon) for Ordinal data • Use Rosner flowchart for guidance • Supplement p-value with estimate of difference (with confidence interval)

  17. Estimate Population Parameters • P-values and hypothesis tests aren’t always necessary • Sometimes you don’t really want to compare things but only estimate values • Estimate parameters of interest and supplement with confidence intervals (IMPORTANT!) .

  18. Demonstrate equivalence • In some instances the goal is to show equivalence of, say, two treatments. • Failing to show a difference using a standard hypothesis test is usually not sufficient evidence of equivalence • Two strategies • Estimate difference and show ‘worst cases’ with confidence interval • Compute a standard hypothesis test with very good power (> 95%)

  19. Demonstrate associations

  20. Prediction • Dichotomous outcome • Logistic regression* • Sensitivities, specificities† • ROC curves† (continuous predictor) • Continuous outcome • Linear regression* • “Leave one out” statistics or cross validation† * Predictivemodel building † assessing predictive model

  21. Reliability/Agreement • Kappa statistic is commonly used for categorical data and two raters. • Intra-class correlation coefficient for multiple raters • If you have a ‘gold standard’ it makes the most sense to tabulate percent correct or average distance from correct.

  22. more Reliability/Agreement • If trying to demonstrate agreement between two continuous measures the correlation coefficient is tangential at best • Better to tabulate statistics related to mean pairwise differences between judges • See • Bland JM, Altman DG. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, i, 307-310. • Available at http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/meas//ba.htm

  23. Other? • Time-to-event data • Kaplan-Meier survival estimate • Cox regression • Other other?

  24. Correlated Data Issues • Data consist of “clusters” of correlated observations. This is common in dental studies (many teeth from same mouth) • Common Solutions? • Collapse data to independent units (patient-level averages) • Adjust for correlation using generalized estimating equations (GEE) or mixed model regression approaches

  25. Homework for Feb. 29 • Following the guidelines presented in class today, present a concise description of your study and planned data analysis to the class. • Plan to keep your talk under ____ minutes • Limited office hours will be available with myself and Dr. Kaiyala to help. Call or email us for appointments.

More Related