1 / 18

The Future of HHW: How Collection, Education and Product Stewardship Can Work Together

The Future of HHW: How Collection, Education and Product Stewardship Can Work Together. Jim Quinn Metro Solid Waste and Recycling Department Portland, Oregon. Metro’s Program. Large urban HHW collection program, >50,000 customers annually, $4 million annual budget

britany
Download Presentation

The Future of HHW: How Collection, Education and Product Stewardship Can Work Together

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Future of HHW: How Collection, Education and Product Stewardship Can Work Together Jim Quinn Metro Solid Waste and Recycling Department Portland, Oregon

  2. Metro’s Program • Large urban HHW collection program, >50,000 customers annually, $4 million annual budget • We spend about $100,000 annually on education- 1 full time staff person • Involved in product stewardship- PSI member, active in paint dialogue, etc.

  3. Collection • Began in early 1980s • Several good reasons to collect: • Health & environmental impacts • CERCLA does not exempt HHW • Collection fosters education • Public demand • Regulations in some areas • Today > 3,000 collection programs

  4. Collection program trends • Events Permanent facilities • Improving: • efficiency, environmental protection, worker protection • Multi-faceted programs: • permanent + mobile • CESQG • latex paint recycling • other: emergency response, abandoned waste, etc. • Taking on new waste streams: electronics, fluorescent tubes, etc.

  5. Participation trends • Increasing convenience leads to more customers • Ultimate: door-to-door • In some cases growth has slowed • Portland Metro still typically sees 7-8% annual growth

  6. How much HHW nationwide? 2 approaches: • Percent of annual MSW- figures vary, 0.5% typical • 1.15 million tons total • EPA: 20 pounds per household per year • 1.3 million tons total • Round figure: 1 million tons nationally • Any good house to house surveys?

  7. Collection program effectiveness • % of households served annually • Average pounds per customer (A X B)/20= % of all HHWgenerated that your program is managing

  8. Collection program effectiveness (cont.) If: Every jurisdiction had a collection program Every collection program collected 50% of what’s out there At ~$1 per pound, we’d be spending $1 billion annually, but 1 billion pounds of HHW would still be going to landfills!

  9. Education • Not just education about hazards & collection opportunities, but waste reduction- buy only what you need, use it up, give it away, etc. • Evolution from simply handing out brochures, to changing behavior • Community-based social marketing principles: determine barriers, pilot on a small scale, measure effectiveness, person-to-person contact, get people to make commitments, understand societal norms, use credible sources, etc.

  10. Education (cont.) • Still a lot to learn about effectively changing behavior when it comes to HHW • So far it is hard to show measurable impact on purchase and use of HHW products, except for highly targeted, small scale, intensive programs • Staffing, funding is limited • Meanwhile, industry spends countless millions getting people to buy more

  11. Product stewardship • Why should government bear the burden of dealing with leftover hazardous products? • The greatest responsibility lies with whoever has the most ability to affect the lifecycle environmental impacts of the product • Shift the responsibility to industry (manufacturers, distributors and retailers) • Ensure that products are nontoxic & recyclable • Incorporate the cost of end-of-life management into the price

  12. Product Stewardship (cont.) • Lots of recent activity on electronics, mercury-containing products, paint • Some are skeptical that it can have a real impact on the quantity of HHW products coming into collection programs

  13. Collection & Education • The existence of collection programs serves to educate people about the hazards • Collection program users are already taking the first step- probably a receptive audience for waste reduction messages • Target waste reduction education on wastes that are most problematic for collection programs- high volume, high cost, toxicity, difficult to recycle

  14. Collection & Education (cont.) • Collection programs may be tailored to handle priority wastes, along with an education program- e.g. mercury & other PBTs • Even if waste reduction education is completely successful, there will still be some wastes generated: spent batteries, used antifreeze & oil, etc.

  15. Collection & Product Stewardship • Collection programs should consider avoiding taking on new wastes when product stewardship solutions are possible • Target product stewardship on wastes that are most problematic for collection programs • Advanced disposal fees may help fund existing collection programs • Industry may operate their own collection programs

  16. Education & Product Stewardship • The user of a product is an important part of the product chain and has their role to play • Product stewardship programs should include a public education component • Promote product stewardship concepts as a part of education programs

  17. Tying it all together • All three tools are important • Consider the role of industry, consumer, & government • The appropriate mix of collection, education & product stewardship depends on the product • Consider cost, public health & environmental impact, waste volume,

  18. Vision Manufacturers are fully engaged in reducing the impacts of their products, and in funding collection and education efforts Fully-funded education programs have had widespread success in changing the public’s use and disposal of hazardous products Convenient, fully-funded collection programs are available and used for disposal of all hazardous products that are still generated

More Related