1 / 157

The Principle of Direct Syntactic Encoding: All grammatical relation changes are lexical

The Principle of Direct Syntactic Encoding: All grammatical relation changes are lexical. Two kinds of movement in transformational grammar:. Two kinds of movement in transformational grammar: "A' movement" (long-distance phenomena): Disse kakene sa Petter [at Kari mente [ - var gode]].

brinly
Download Presentation

The Principle of Direct Syntactic Encoding: All grammatical relation changes are lexical

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Principle of Direct Syntactic Encoding: All grammatical relation changes are lexical

  2. Two kinds of movement in transformational grammar:

  3. Two kinds of movement in transformational grammar: "A' movement" (long-distance phenomena): Disse kakene sa Petter [at Kari mente [ - var gode]]

  4. Two kinds of movement in transformational grammar: "A' movement" (long-distance phenomena): Disse kakene sa Petter [at Kari mente [ - var gode]] "A-movement": Rapporten skrives av sekretæren

  5. Two kinds of movement in transformational grammar: "A' movement" (long-distance phenomena): Disse kakene sa Petter [at Kari mente [ - var gode]] "A-movement": Rapporten skrives av sekretæren XP NP VP V NP Configurational analysis of passive

  6. Two kinds of movement in transformational grammar: "A' movement" (long-distance phenomena): Disse kakene sa Petter [at Kari mente [ - var gode]] "A-movement": Rapporten skrives av sekretæren XP active passive R < x y >  R < x y > S O (OBL) S NP VP V NP Configurational analysis of passive Relational analysis of passive

  7.  ( SUBJ) ( CF)     The seeming movement under passivization in English is simply a consequence of the configurational assignment of GFs in that language: XP VP NP NP V CF = non-discourse argument functions

  8. In a non-configurational language like Malayalam there is no seeming movement under passivization:

  9.  PRED 'worship<( SUBJ)( OBJ)>' In a non-configurational language like Malayalam there is no seeming movement under passivization: PRED 'child' CASE nom SUBJ PRED 'elephant' CASE acc OBJ S NP V NP kutti aanaye aaraadiccu child.NOM elephant.ACC worship.PAST

  10.    PRED 'worship<( SUBJ)( OBJ)>' PRED 'worship<( OBLag)( SUBJ)>' In a non-configurational language like Malayalam there is no seeming movement under passivization: PRED 'child' CASE nom SUBJ PRED 'elephant' CASE acc OBJ S NP V NP kutti aanaye aaraadiccu child.NOM elephant.ACC worship.PAST PRED 'child' CASE instr OBLag PRED 'elephant' CASE nom S SUBJ NP V NP kuttiyaal aana aaraadhikkappettu child.INSTR elephant.NOM worship.PASS.PAST

  11. The classical LFG passive analysis: A lexical redundancy rule A pattern in the lexicon writes write < SUBJOBJ > written write < OBLag/ SUBJ > eats eat < SUBJOBJ > eaten eat < OBLag/ SUBJ > buys buy < SUBJOBJ > bought buy < OBLag/ SUBJ > ...

  12. The classical LFG passive analysis: A lexical redundancy rule A pattern in the lexicon writes write < SUBJOBJ > written write < OBLag/ SUBJ > eats eat < SUBJOBJ > eaten eat < OBLag/ SUBJ > buys buy < SUBJOBJ > bought buy < OBLag/ SUBJ > ... Abstracted as a lexical rule: OBJ ⇒ SUBJ SUBJ ⇒ OBLag SUBJ ⇒ 

  13. Part of the passive template in a Norwegian computational LFG grammar: PASS (SCHEMATA) = { SCHEMATA ~(↑PASSIVE)=+ | SCHEMATA (↑PASSIVE)=c + { (↑OBJ) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑OBL-TH) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑OBJ-BEN) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑COMP) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑XCOMP) --> (↑SUBJ) } { (↑SUBJ) --> (↑OBL-AG) | (↑SUBJ) --> NULL } }.

  14. Part of the passive template in a Norwegian computational LFG grammar: PASS (SCHEMATA) = { SCHEMATA ~(↑PASSIVE)=+ | SCHEMATA (↑PASSIVE)=c + { (↑OBJ) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑OBL-TH) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑OBJ-BEN) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑COMP) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑XCOMP) --> (↑SUBJ) } { (↑SUBJ) --> (↑OBL-AG) | (↑SUBJ) --> NULL } }. Template invocation in a lexical entry P: P V @(PASS [(↑PRED)='P<(↑SUBJ)(↑OBJ)>' ... ])

  15. Part of the passive template in a Norwegian computational LFG grammar: PASS (SCHEMATA) = { SCHEMATA ~(↑PASSIVE)=+ | SCHEMATA (↑PASSIVE)=c + { (↑OBJ) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑OBL-TH) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑OBJ-BEN) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑COMP) --> (↑SUBJ) | (↑XCOMP) --> (↑SUBJ) } { (↑SUBJ) --> (↑OBL-AG) | (↑SUBJ) --> NULL } }. Template invocation in a lexical entry P: P V @(PASS [(↑PRED)='P<(↑SUBJ)(↑OBJ)>' ... ]) http://iness.uib.no/xle-web

  16. Grammatical Functions TOP FOC SUBJ OBJ OBJ OBL COMPL ADJUNCT non-a-fns non-a-fns a-fns

  17. Grammatical Functions d-fns TOP FOC SUBJ OBJ OBJ OBL COMPL ADJUNCT non-a-fns non-a-fns a-fns

  18. Grammatical Functions non-d-fns d-fns TOP FOC SUBJ OBJ OBJ OBL COMPL ADJUNCT non-a-fns non-a-fns a-fns

  19. Grammatical Functions non-d-fns d-fns TOP FOC SUBJ OBJ OBJ OBL COMPL ADJUNCT non-a-fns non-a-fns a-fns

  20. X'-syntax Basic schema: XP YP X' X0 ZP X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D (Left-to-right order unspecified)

  21. X'-syntax Basic schema: XP Specifier YP X' Head Complement X0 ZP X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D (Left-to-right order unspecified)

  22. X'-syntax Basic schema: Lexical projections: LP XP YP L' YP X' L0 ZP X0 ZP X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P

  23. X'-syntax Basic schema: Lexical projections: NP XP YP N' YP X' Cæsar's N0 ZP X0 ZP conquest of Gallia X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P

  24. X'-syntax Basic schema: Lexical projections: VP XP YP V' YP X' Cæsar V0 ZP X0 ZP conquered Gallia X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P

  25. X'-syntax Basic schema: Lexical projections: XP VP YP X' V0 ZP X0 ZP conquered Gallia X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P

  26. X'-syntax Basic schema: Lexical projections: XP AP YP X' A0 ZP X0 ZP afraid of dogs X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P

  27. X'-syntax Basic schema: Lexical projections: PP XP YP P' YP X' three miles P0 ZP X0 ZP past the border X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P

  28. X'-syntax Basic schema: Lexical projections: XP PP YP X' P0 ZP X0 ZP on the table X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P

  29. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Lexical projections: LP FP XP YP L' YP F' YP X' L0 ZP F0 ZP X0 ZP X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D

  30. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Lexical projections: LP XP YP L' CP YP X' L0 ZP C0 ZP X0 ZP that Mary left X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D

  31. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Lexical projections: LP IP XP YP L' YP I' YP X' Mary L0 ZP I0 ZP X0 ZP may leave John X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D

  32. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Lexical projections: LP XP YP L' DP YP X' L0 ZP D0 ZP X0 ZP this theory X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D

  33. X'-syntax Adjunction: XP Functional projections: Lexical projections: LP FP WP XP YP L' YP F' YP X' L0 ZP F0 ZP X0 ZP X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D

  34. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Lexical projections: LP FP XP YP L' YP F' YP X' L0 ZP F0 ZP X0 ZP X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D Lexical integrity: "Morphological complete words are leaves of the c-structure tree and each leaf corresponds to one and only one c-structure node."

  35. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Lexical projections: LP FP XP YP L' YP F' YP X' L0 ZP F0 ZP X0 ZP X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D Economy of Expression: "All syntactic phrase structure nodes are optional and are not used unless required by independent principles (completeness, coherence, semantic expressivity)."

  36. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Example of optionality: FP XP VP YP F' YP X' V0 NP F0 ZP X0 ZP conquered Gallia X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D Economy of Expression: "All syntactic phrase structure nodes are optional and are not used unless required by independent principles (completeness, coherence, semantic expressivity)."

  37. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Example of optionality: FP XP VP YP F' YP X' NP F0 ZP X0 ZP Gallia X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D Economy of Expression: "All syntactic phrase structure nodes are optional and are not used unless required by independent principles (completeness, coherence, semantic expressivity)."

  38. X'-syntax Functional projections: Basic schema: Example of optionality: FP XP VP YP F' YP X' NP F0 ZP X0 ZP Gallia X0: N, V, A, P, C, I, D L0: N, V, A, P F0: C, I, D Economy of Expression: "All syntactic phrase structure nodes are optional and are not used unless required by independent principles (completeness, coherence, semantic expressivity)."

  39.         Two kinds of 'heads' c-structure heads (according to X' theory): XP XP XP YP X' X YP YP X X0 ZP f-structure heads: A A A B C B C B C

  40. The Mapping Principles Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP FP YP L' YP F' L0 ZP F0 ZP

  41.         The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP FP YP L' YP F' L0 ZP F0 ZP

  42. ( DF)         The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP FP YP L' YP F' L0 ZP F0 ZP

  43. ( SUBJ)         The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Example ([SPEC, IP] as SUBJ): Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP IP YP L' NP I' Mary L0 ZP I0 VP may leave John

  44. ( DF)           The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Complements of functional categories are f-structure co-heads. Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP FP YP L' YP F' L0 ZP F0 ZP

  45. ( SUBJ)           The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Complements of functional categories are f-structure co-heads. Example 1 (VP as co-head with I): Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP IP YP L' NP I' Mary L0 ZP I0 VP may leave John

  46.           The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Complements of functional categories are f-structure co-heads. Example 2 (NP as co-head with D): Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP YP L' DP L0 ZP D0 NP this theory

  47.  ( DF) ( CF)           The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Complements of functional categories are f-structure co-heads. Complements of lexical categories are the nondiscourse argument functions CF. Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP FP YP L' YP F' L0 ZP F0 ZP

  48.  ( DF) ( OBJ)           The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Complements of functional categories are f-structure co-heads. Complements of lexical categories are the nondiscourse argument functions CF. Example 1 (DP as OBJ of P): Lexical projections: Functional projections: PP FP YP P' YP F' three miles P0 DP F0 ZP past the border

  49.  ( DF) ( COMP)         The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Complements of functional categories are f-structure co-heads. Complements of lexical categories are the nondiscourse argument functions CF. Example 2 (CP as COMP of V): Lexical projections: Functional projections: FP VP YP F' V0 CP F0 ZP said that John left

  50.    ( AF) ( DF) ( DF) ( AF)               The Mapping Principles C-structure heads are f-structure heads. Specifiers of functional categories are the grammaticalized discourse functions DF. Complements of functional categories are f-structure co-heads. Complements of lexical categories are the nondiscourse argument functions CF. Constituents adjoined to phrasal constituents are nonargument functions AFor not annotated. Lexical projections: Functional projections: LP FP LP FP WP WP YP L' YP F' L0 ZP F0 ZP

More Related