1 / 24

Civilsamfundsstrategien Mål- og resultat-rapportering

Civilsamfundsstrategien Mål- og resultat-rapportering. Ny rapporteringsmodel – hvorfor?. Rigsrevisionen – øgede politisk-administrative krav Opfølgning: M&E practices (EVAL/HLM) Tematisk evaluering (EVAL/NCG) Ny CS-strategi (HUM)  Vi vil fortælle en anden historie. 9 strategiske mål.

brielle-schmidt
Download Presentation

Civilsamfundsstrategien Mål- og resultat-rapportering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Civilsamfundsstrategien Mål- og resultat-rapportering

  2. Ny rapporteringsmodel –hvorfor? Rigsrevisionen – øgede politisk-administrative krav Opfølgning: M&E practices (EVAL/HLM) Tematisk evaluering (EVAL/NCG) Ny CS-strategi (HUM) Vi vil fortælle en anden historie

  3. 9 strategiske mål Vibrant and open debate inter+nationally Representative, legitimate and local civil society Capacity development, advocacy and networking Focus on rights Flexible/relevant interventions in fragile situations Civil society support in Danish multi-bi-assistance Involvement of Danish civil society organisations Collaboration with other stakeholders Goals and results.

  4. Mål 9: Goals and results Denmark will, through collaboration between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Danish organisations, strengthen results orientation of the activities implemented in support of civil society development. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs will report on progress in relation to the above strategic goals.

  5. Rapporteringsmodel Målgrupper – hvem? Indhold – hvad? System – hvordan? Ressourcer – hvor meget?

  6. Målgrupper – hvem? Politiske system: URU Styrelsen Rigsrevisionen Den brede offentlighed

  7. Indhold – hvad? Strategiske mål Strategiske outcomes Ultimate Intermediate immediate Outputs Indikatorer

  8. System – hvordan? Produktet og processen En fælles rapporteringsmodel Aid harmonisation: donor, CSO Adfærdsregulering:ensretning vs mangfoldighed

  9. Ressourcer – hvor meget? Input skal genereres Roller – hvem skal bidrage med hvad? Omfang – dækning, dybde Transaktionsomkostninger – cost effectiveness

  10. Den Gode Proces  Agreement with key stakeholders on scope of reporting requirements at strategic goal level. Consent with intermediary organisations through the NGO-forum as their representative on the principles of an operational monitoring framework, documenting achievements across organisations. Endorsed plan for communicating achievements of civil society support.

  11. Vi smøger ærmerne op … Establishment of a Reference Group with participation of members of the NGO-forum and chaired by MFA. Establishment of a Working Group comprising of technical experts appointed from the organisations and chaired by the NGO-forum/Thematic Forum.

  12. Summe-summe Hvad fik I af: Indfald Tanker Associationer Processen: Outcome Proces Scope of activities

  13. Ottawa Roundtable Harmonisering – uniformisering Mangfoldighed: Politisk kontekst CS paradigme Relation donor-organisationer Aid effectiveness eller development effectiveness

  14. CS paradigme 2 markante retninger: CS som mål i sig selv – CSOer som ’development actors in their own right’ Instrumentel tilgang

  15. Værdier i rapportering ’Daring and Courageous Reporting’ – go against mainstream Leve egne værdier: civil society eller civilised society? Kendskab, kundskab, kasser Beskrivelse eller Analyse Læring vs. ’den perfekte verden’ Magt og kontrol

  16. Legitimitet Gensidig accountability Hvem fortæller hvis historie? Artikulere eget bidrag til udvikling Partnerdialog Donor-N-S? Undgå at hælde arbejdet over på syd-partnere

  17. Rapporteringsmodeller Den hollandske model CS modellen Den danske model?

  18. Den hollandske model I Results in development-rapport hvert 2. år 2008: +50 hollandske CSO Fælles skriveproces: ministerium, ambassader, CSO (Red Alert  ) MDG result chains Case countries per tema

  19. Den hollandske model II Monitorering af CSO tailor-made approach CSO nøgle indikatorer og targets: Input Output Outcome Bæredygtighed Indikatorer kan justeres hen ad vejen

  20. Den hollandske model – challenges Aggregering af resultater svær (pærer + bananer = æbler) Tid-tid-tid at indsamle data Stor variation i CSOer og interventioner

  21. Den hollandske model – spørgsmål I Hvordan kan man bedst aggregere resultater? Fælles indikatorer? Hvilke? Resultat-baseret monitorering eller læring gennem evaluering? Hvilken type info er bedst egnet til politikere og folket?

  22. Den hollandske model – spørgsmål II Skal donorer tjekke kvalitet/funktion af CSO-monitorerings-systemer? Hvordan bruge evalueringer til at forbedre CSO resultater? Skal man forske i CSO effectiveness sammenlignet med multi-bi støtte?

  23. Den danske model? Hvilke principper skal guide den danske rapporteringsmodel?

  24. Vejen frem? Forslag til procesplan – PAP? Teknisk arbejdsgruppe – rolle? Næste skridt?

More Related