Vermont results of the go prosper survey round 1 fall 2010
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 18

VERMONT Results of the GO PROSPER Survey Round 1, Fall 2010 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 62 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

VERMONT Results of the GO PROSPER Survey Round 1, Fall 2010. PRO moting S chool-community-university P artnerships to E nhance R esilience. GO PROSPER survey, round 1.

Download Presentation

VERMONT Results of the GO PROSPER Survey Round 1, Fall 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Vermont results of the go prosper survey round 1 fall 2010

VERMONTResults of the GO PROSPER Survey Round 1, Fall 2010

PROmoting School-community-university Partnerships to Enhance Resilience


Go prosper survey round 1

GO PROSPER survey, round 1

This report was prepared for the Cooperative Extension System of the state of Vermont. In it you will find information from the seven Extension Systems that are taking part in the “Grand Opportunity” (GO) PROSPER Expansion project funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. It is being conducted by researchers at the Partnerships in Prevention Science Institute at Iowa State University, in collaboration with Extension personnel and researchers at Pennsylvania State University’s Prevention Research Institute.

Data were collected using a web-based survey distributed to Extension Administrators and all Extension employees associated with the 4-H and Family Program areas. Included in this report are the aggregated responses obtained from Vermont and from all seven participating states (including Vermont called “All GO States” in the tables and figures).

Results are based on responses from the 726 participating Extension employees in the seven states (a response rate of 63%), including 20 (a 91% response rate) from Vermont.


Main themes

Main themes

  • Problem Awareness

  • Decision-Making about Programming

  • Implementation of Evidence-Based Programs by Extension

  • Existing Program Evaluation Practices

  • Existing Partnerships with Schools

  • Existing Partnerships with Other State Agencies

  • Existing Partnerships with Communities

  • Organizational Resources

  • Training Availability


Problem awareness

Problem awareness

Current interest, attitude, demands, and commitment concerning prevention programming targeting youth and families, as well as existing obstacles to adopting such programming by the Cooperative Extension System. State level presumes programming implemented state-wide, while community level assumes programming selected by particular community to meet specific needs.

How serious are each of the following problems for communities in your state?


Decision making about programming

Decision-making about programming

Practices for decisions related to program selection.


Implementation of evidence based programs

Implementation of evidence-based programs

Current use of evidence-based programs by the Cooperative Extension System and factors that influence decisions about adopting new Evidence-Based Programs. The term evidence-based refers to programs based on sound theory that have been rigorously evaluated (e.g., compared with a control group) and proven to produce long-term positive effects in reducing substance use, delinquency or other youth problems.


Existing program evaluation practices

Existing program evaluation practices

Practices of program quality assurance and evaluation currently employed by the Cooperative Extension System.


Existing program evaluation practices1

Existing program evaluation practices


Existing partnerships with schools

Existing partnerships with schools

Partnerships and partnership stability between Extension and the school system.


Existing partnerships with other state agencies

Existing partnerships with other state agencies

Partnerships between extension and other agencies within the state.


Existing partnerships with communities

Existing partnerships with communities

Partnerships between Cooperative Extension and local communities.


Organizational resources

Organizational resources

Current availability of financial and human resources, as well as time and availability of professional development within the Cooperative Extension System.


Organizational resources1

Organizational resources


Training availability how much training have you received regarding

Training availabilityHow much training have you received regarding:


Training availability how much training have you received regarding1

Training availabilityHow much training have you received regarding:


Please visit our websites at

Please visit our websites at…

www.prosper.ppsi.iastate.edu

www.ppsi.iastate.edu

www.prevention.psu.edu


Vermont results of the go prosper survey round 1 fall 2010

The PROSPER Partnership Group

Iowa State UniversityPennsylvania State University

Partnership in Prevention Science InstitutePrevention Research Center

Richard Spoth, DirectorMark Greenberg, Director

PPSI Scientists:PRC Scientists:

Cleve RedmondChungyeol ShinMark FeinbergDaniel F. Perkins

Lisa SchainkerKate RalstonClaudia MincemoyerJanet Welsh

Sarah Meyer Chilenski

Human Interaction Research Institute

Tom Backer, Director

Funded by

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The Annie E. Casey Foundation

The National Institute on Drug Abuse


  • Login