1 / 26

B  D ( * ) K GLW, ADS

B  D ( * ) K GLW, ADS. Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK). Referees: Z. Dolezal , N. Muramatsu , K. Sakai. Thanks to very active refereeing!. ϕ 3 from B  D (*) K decays. _. Tree-level ϕ 3 determination from interference of B  DK and B  DK amplitudes.

brenna
Download Presentation

B  D ( * ) K GLW, ADS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BD(*)K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing!

  2. ϕ3 from BD(*)K decays _ • Tree-level ϕ3 determination from interference of BDK and BDK amplitudes. • Need D and D to decay to common final state. • Relative magnitude of suppressed amplitude is rB ~ 0.1. • Relative weak phaseis ϕ3, and relative strong phase is δB. _ ϕ3 ~ −arg(Vub) Color-suppressed Color-allowed

  3. Definitions of A and R given in BN1201. rD and δD: well known.

  4. BN1201 (presented at LP11, this talk) BN1201 (will be analyzed later) Y. Horii, K. Trabelsi et al., PRL (2011) BN1201 (presented at LP11, this talk) rD and δD: well known.

  5. Key Points of the Method • Continuum suppression • 9 variables:LR(KSFW), Δz, cosθKD, cosθB, |qr|,cosθT, dDK, QBQK, and ΔQ.(For details, see BN1201.) • Transformed: NBNB’. • 2-D fit for ΔE and NB’. • No significant signal loss due to tight cut on NB’. • Simultaneous fit for Dπ/DK. • Better understanding of Dπ/DK feed across. qq MC Signal MC

  6. 1. Result for BDK GLW

  7. Dπ (KID < 0.6) / Dπ (KID > 0.6) = (7.65 ± 0.14)%, consistent w/ (7.94 ± 0.31)% in MC xCalib.

  8. CP+

  9. CP−

  10. Comparison of the Results • Since GGSZ observables are related to the same parameters (ϕ3, rB, δB),we obtain predictions on RCP± and ACP± from the GGSZ observables. • Our results are consistent with GGSZ predictions. 0.4 0.4 Belle, GLW 0.2 0.2 WA, GLW WA, GLW ACP− WA, GGSZ ACP+ 0 0 WA, GGSZ −0.2 −0.2 Belle, GLW −0.4 −0.4 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 RCP+ RCP− WA taken from HFAG 2011 summer.

  11. 2. Result for BD*K ADS

  12. First Evidence for BD*K ADS Mode • Signal seen with 3.5σsignificance for D*Dγ mode. • Ratio to favored mode: • Difference between RDπ0 and RDγ: indication of the effect of the interference term 2rB*rDcos(δB*+δD)cosϕ3 (opposite sign for RDπ0 and RDγ). continuum continuum Signal Signal D*π D*π DK/Dπ DK/Dπ BB BB

  13. Asymmetries for BD*K ADS Mode • Asymmetry: • Indication of opposite signfor ADπ0 and ADγ:consistent with expectation.(Opposite strong phasebetween D*Dπ0 and D*Dγ.) • Combining RDπ0, RDγ, ADπ0, and ADγ: indication of negative cos(δB*+δD)cosϕ3 and positive sin(δB*+δD)sinϕ3. Consistent with BD(*)K Dalitz result.

  14. Comparison of the Results • Since GGSZ observables are related to the same parameters (ϕ3, rB, δB),we obtain predictions on RADS and AADS from the GGSZ observables. • Our results are consistent with GGSZ predictions. 1 1 WA, ADS 0.5 0.5 WA, GGSZ WA, ADS AADS,Dπ0 AADS,Dγ WA, GGSZ 0 0 Belle, ADS(Error of AADS,Dπ0 is larger,because of smaller RADS,Dπ0.) −0.5 −0.5 Belle, ADS −1 −1 0 0 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 RADS,Dπ0 RADS,Dγ WA taken from HFAG 2011 summer.

  15. 3. Extraction of ϕ3

  16. Global fit for ϕ3 • Global ϕ3 fit using CKMfitter. • Includes all BD(*)K observables over the experiments. • Recent activities certainly improve the precision. • Now the precision is 10°! Significant contribution from Belle. New results for BDK ADS added. Belle (PRL), CDF (PLHC11), and LHCb (EPS11). New results by Belle for BD*K ADS (LP11) and BDK GLW (LP11).

  17. Summary and Plan • BDK GLW • Large asymmetry (~30%) for DCP+. • Opposite signs for the asymmetries for CP+ and CP−. • BD*K ADS • First evidence (3.5σ) for D*Dγ. • Difference between D*Dγ and Dπ0: information of ϕ3. • Extraction of ϕ3 • Value obtained by CKMfitter is (68±10)°. • Significant contribution from recent results of Belle. • Will add DKSη(3π), KSω, and KSη’ in BDK GLW analysis, analyze BD*K GLW, and prepare paper draft.

  18. Backup slides

  19. Check for BD*π ADS: Validity of the Method continuum continuum D*π D*π D*K D*K DK/Dπ DK/Dπ BB BB

  20. ϕ3 from BDK, DCP eigenstates (GLW) New from Belle, full data (772M BB) B-DCP+K- B+DCP+K+ B-DCP-K- B+DCP-K+ CP violation clearly established.

  21. ϕ3 from BDK, Dsuppressed states (ADS) Y. Horii et al. (Belle),published in PRL 106, 231803 in June 2011 First evidence (4.1σ) obtained.Indication of negative asymmetry. LHCb also reported the evidence. Promising method for ϕ3 determination.

  22. ϕ3 from BD*K, Dsuppressed states (ADS) New from Belle,full data (772M BB) 3.5σ Suppressed mode alsoappearing in BD*K, D*Dγ mode.

More Related