Development of congestion management process using a travel demand forecasting model
Download
1 / 52

Development of Congestion Management Process Using A Travel Demand Forecasting Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 159 Views
  • Uploaded on

Development of Congestion Management Process Using A Travel Demand Forecasting Model. Huey P. Dugas. TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada May 11, 2011. Causes of Congestion. Causes of Congestion. M&O in Context of Metropolitan Transportation Planning Requirements.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Development of Congestion Management Process Using A Travel Demand Forecasting Model' - breena


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Development of congestion management process using a travel demand forecasting model
Development of Congestion Management Process Using A Travel Demand Forecasting Model

Huey P. Dugas

TRB Planning Applications Conference

Reno, Nevada

May 11, 2011


Causes of congestion
Causes of Congestion Demand Forecasting Model


Causes of congestion1
Causes of Congestion Demand Forecasting Model




384Text Pages Requirements

65 Maps (Graphics)

449 Total Pages

www.crpc-la.org


Model trips by purpose
Model Trips by Purpose Requirements

n



Model trips by purpose2
Model Trips by Purpose Requirements

HBW + NHBW Trips in 2009 = 26.3%




Congested segments by functional class
Congested Segments Requirements by Functional Class


CMP Corridor Map Requirements




Geo Requirements


Crash rate estimation

Crash Rate (R Requirementsse) Formula

Rse = {(A)(1,000,000)} / {(365)(T)(V)(L)}

where:

Rse = Crash Rate of Section of Exposure in accidents per million vehicle miles of travel (ACC/MVM)

A = Total number of accidents on the roadway section for the analysis period

T = Time period of the study (in years or fraction of years)

V = Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) during the study period

L = Length of section in miles

Crash Rate Estimation



Cmp criteria for implementation
CMP Criteria for Implementation Requirements

Criteria Selecting Prioritizing Congested Segments

  • Congestion/Delay in Time (Daily Delay Vehicle – Hour per Mile of Segment)

  • Transit, e.g., Does Identified segment have transit service?

  • Safety (Number of Crashes in 2008 on a Segment)

  • Projects Planned in TIP

  • Projects in Long Range Transportation Plan

  • Local Priorities





Introduction to and update on unconventional intersections and interchanges

Introduction to and Update on Unconventional Intersections and Interchanges

Joseph E. Hummer, Ph.D., P.E.

Professor of Civil Engineering

Raleigh, NC

Telephone 919-515-7733

Email [email protected]

For LA Planning Council, March 30, 2010


Superstreet
Superstreet and Interchanges


Advantages of superstreet conceptual
Advantages of ‘Superstreet’ (Conceptual) and Interchanges

  • Referred to as Michigan Left, since used in Detroit for decades

  • Used on Arterials w/ Heavy Traffic Compared to Cross Streets

  • Cross Street Traffic Takes Right Turn at Intersection, Then U-Turn and Right Turn

  • Cross Traffic Choosing Left on Sherwood, Follows Same Path but Remains on Sherwood

  • Traffic Signal Phasing Reduced to 2 Phases (1 for Protected Left/Right Movements) at U-turn Crossovers and Cross Street Intersections, and 1 for Thru Movement


Advantages of superstreet benefits
Advantages of ‘Superstreet’ – (Benefits) and Interchanges

  • Superstreet eliminates cross-traffic on Principal Arterial

  • Allows longer Green Times for Thru Traffic on Principal Arterial

  • So Higher Volumes Get Through During Each Cycle

  • Appears Counter Intuitive but Reduces Congestion

  • Some Commute Times have shown reductions by 50%

  • Increases safety by reducing the number of conflict points from 32 (conventional intersection) to 14 (super street).

  • http://www.texashighwayman.com/us281ss.shtml


Superstreet advantages
Superstreet Advantages and Interchanges


Superstreet advantages1
Superstreet Advantages and Interchanges

Perfect two-way progression at any speed with any signal spacing!

Install signals anywhere

You set progression speed


Pedestrians
Pedestrians and Interchanges

  • Safe, controlled

  • Slow, two-stage

  • Could offset vehicles to align pedestrians

  • Could place midblock ped signals almost anywhere

  • Could easily prohibit RTOR


Vicinity maps of priority a segments
Vicinity Maps of Priority ‘A’ Segments and Interchanges

Ascension

East Baton Rouge

Livingston

W. Baton Rouge


Next steps
Next Steps and Interchanges

  • Priority ‘A’ Segments Eligible for Stage 0 Studies

  • Incorporate Priority Segments in Next Long Range Plan Update

  • Monitor Strategy Effectiveness

  • Re-evaluate CMP Process (Objectives, Network, Segments and Strategies


Process limitations proposed projects la 1 i 10 connector

Process Limitations and Interchanges Proposed ProjectsLA 1/I-10 Connector


La 1 i 10 connector
LA 1/I-10 Connector and Interchanges

LA 1 Hwy 4 Lane Divided North South Direction

Connects Mississippi River Bridge on Interstate 10 to Chemical Plants South

Large Commute Pattern for Work Trips

Intracoastal Canal Bridge Near I-10 Bridge Problems of Age, Capacity, Repairs, Maintenance and Accidents (No Detour)

3 Mile New Route Designed as Toll Road

Use Private-Public Partnership as Revenue Source

Design Build Proposal

Completing Investment Grade Study

Approved Environmental Study

Modeling Shows 4 Lanes Justified


La 1 connector toll facility

LA 1 Connector Toll Facility and Interchanges

2001 WBR Conducted Feasibility Study to Build New Road to Connect LA 415 at I-10 and LA 1

DOTD Contracted to Conduct Alignment Analysis and Environmental Study

Environmental Study Concluded with FONSI

Immediately Contacted by Private Investors for Concession to Build as Tolled Project


Project Description and Interchanges

  • Need Driven by Detour and Evacuation Route for Traffic South of I-10

  • Alternative Route for Local and Regional Traffic During Peak Periods

  • Detour Traffic for Maintenance/Repairs/Accidents Existing LA 1 Intracoastal Bridge

  • Serves Demand for Trucks to Intermodal Facilities at Baton Rouge Port and Operations on Northline Road


Current Status and Interchanges

Decision to Build Toll Facility Through Public Private Partnership

Local Toll Authority (TA) Created

Articles of Incorporation Adopted and Filed w/ Secretary of State

Bylaws Adopted at TA’s Organizational Meeting

TA Receiving $5mil from State Legislature to Prepare Prelim Design

Prelim Design Plans Used to Purchase Right-of-Way on Three Parcels

TA Advertise and Select Private Investor on Completion of Preliminary Design

Private Investors To Contract for Preparation Final Design and Construction

TA and PP to Contract for Operation and Maintenance of Road and Toll Operations


Development of congestion management process using a travel demand forecasting model1
Development of Congestion Management Process Using A Travel Demand Forecasting Model

Huey P. Dugas

TRB Planning Applications Conference

Reno, Nevada

May 11, 2011


ad