1 / 16

An Introduction to Information Literacy

An Introduction to Information Literacy. Judith Keene Information and Learning Services, University of Worcester. What is Information Literacy?.

brand
Download Presentation

An Introduction to Information Literacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Introduction to Information Literacy Judith Keene Information and Learning Services, University of Worcester

  2. What is Information Literacy? • “An information literate person is one who is able to recognize when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate and effectively use the needed information” American Library Association 1989

  3. Development of the concept • Term first used in 1974 • Paul Zurkowski, Information Industry Association (IIA), • viewed a growing need for better handling and use of the increasing proliferation of information in the workplace. • Recognised the need to be able to use tools as well as information sources

  4. ILit within the H.E. sector • 1970s – definitions began to emerge from librarians and the education sector • 1980s - new information technologies began to be recognized as an important feature of information literacy. • mid 1980's, academic librarians began to view user education programs in terms of information literacy rather than information skills • 1990’s Development of standards and best practice e.g SCONUL model (1999), ACRL (USA), CAUL (Australia) • 2005 JISC i-skills programme aimed at HE and FE staff

  5. Current trends • Move towards institutional strategies / policies for ILit • Embedding in curricula • New delivery methods –e.g.VLEs • Work on assessing / evaluating effectiveness and impact

  6. Models • ACRL (USA) • detailed performace indicators and outcomes but does not indicate the level of skill involved • http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm • SCONUL (UK) • assumes progression through levels • http://www.sconul.ac.uk/activities/inf_lit/papers/Seven_pillars2.pdf

  7. QAA Subject Benchmark for Computing • Effective information-retrieval skills (including the use of browsers, search engines and catalogues). • ‘learning in the future is likely to revolve around the use and exploitation of electronic material.. for the present, academics face the challenge of how to teach this and how to assess it.’

  8. Art and Design • source, navigate, select, retrieve, evaluate, manipulate and manage information from a variety of sources; • select and employ communication and information technologies.

  9. Biosciences

  10. Engineering

  11. POSSIBLE STUMBLING BLOCKS TO COLLABORATION External factors • resource limitations • logistical difficulties • Institutional teaching paradigms which do not favour active learning approaches • Constraints to introducing change within department / institution

  12. POSSIBLE STUMBLING BLOCKS TO COLLABORATION (2) Internal factors : i.e. beliefs and perceptions Academics • view of librarians’ role within learning & teaching • Limited concept of ILit that focuses on sources and processes • See ILit as already catered for within programme – students will ‘pick it up’ or should take up one of the opportunities available Librarians • Perception of themselves within learning & teaching • Lack of leverage to cause change

  13. WORKING TOGETHER – RETRIEVING INFORMATION • Traditional model of demonstrating database and follow up worksheets • Lecturer involved in: • Setting assignment / learning outcomes • Reinforcing in subsequent weeks • Jointly measuring change in skills and quality of bibliographies • http://informationr.net/ir/9-2/paper173.html

  14. WORKING TOGETHER - EVALUATING INFORMATION • Higher cognitive skills involved • Group work used to discuss and draw out principles based on subject-specific scenarios • Librarian provided expert knowledge on evaluation skills • Lecturer involved in: • Devising appropriate scenarios • Measuring change in skills and quality of bibliographies

  15. Sample Group Exercise You are researching the uptake of CASE tools by developers in the West Midlands and analysis of data from your own research indicates positive usage patterns in the three years after purchase. You find an article in the peer-reviewed journal IEEE Software that includes “…after one year of introduction, 70% of CASE tools are never used…” What do you do? CHOOSE ONE ANSWER Use it anyway ……………………………….. Leave it out ………………………………… Use it but explain the different findings ……… Evaluate its research methodology ………….. Don’t know …………………………………… Reasons for your choice

  16. COLLABORATIVE OUTCOMES • Benefit from existing teacher / student relationship • Student-centred activities relating to the subject • Timely linking to module assignment and learning outcomes • Reinforcement by lecturer in subsequent sessions • Librarians benefit from tutors’ teaching experience • Tutor can benefit from librarian’s skills and raise own awareness and ILit skills

More Related