1 / 18

CLIC Quadrupoles

CLIC Quadrupoles. Th. Zickler CERN. Outlook. Main Beam Quadrupoles (MBQ) Requirements and constraints Proposed quadrupole layout Magnetic field calculations and characteristics List of open issues Next steps Final Focusing Quadrupole (FFQ) Conclusions. Main Beam Quadrupoles MBQ.

bran
Download Presentation

CLIC Quadrupoles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN

  2. Outlook Main Beam Quadrupoles (MBQ) • Requirements and constraints • Proposed quadrupole layout • Magnetic field calculations and characteristics • List of open issues • Next steps Final Focusing Quadrupole (FFQ) Conclusions

  3. Main Beam Quadrupoles MBQ

  4. MBQ Requirements and Constraints 2001 Main Beam quadrupoles per CLIC Linac High reliability, very robust design, low MTBF Beam energy increase requires variation of integrated field gradient in the range between 15 Tm/m and 370 Tm/m Aperture and field requirements • Magnetic length: between 350 and 1850 mm • Field gradient: 200 T/m • Aperture radius: 4 mm Integrated pulsed H/V steering coils Baseline: 4 types of different length Alternative: several magnets of one type connected in series

  5. Preliminary Magnetic Design Aperture radius: 4.00 mm Integrated gradient: 70 (170, 270, 370 ) Tm/m Nominal gradient: 200 T/m Iron length: 346 (846, 1346, 1846) mm Magnetic length: 350 (850, 1350, 1850) mm Magnet width: < 200 mm Important: this layout is based on magnetic computations only; no mechanical analysis has been done so far! The dimensions are presently not validated!

  6. MBQ Magnetic Field Calculations

  7. MBQ Gradient Homogeneity Gradient homogeneity: Better than 4 * 10-4 inside good-field-region (GFR) GFR radius: 2.5 mm

  8. MBQ Corrector Field Homogeneity Dipole field homogeneity: Better than 4 * 10-1 inside good-field-region (GFR) GFR on x-axis: ± 2.5 mm Strong sextupolar component (b3)

  9. Open Issues Cooling circuit • Long term reliability • Actual proposal: indirect water cooled coils • Current density: 3 A/mm2 or more • Limited space in coil window • Heat dissipation into tunnel ? • Cooling efficiency ? • Advanced insulation materials • Other options: • Water cooled yoke • Decreased power consumption to avoid water cooling • Hybrid magnet (permanent magnets combined with coils) • Advanced coil design and cooling layout needed

  10. Open Issues (cont.) Manufacturing and assembly tolerances • Small aperture • High mechanical precision to achieve required filed quality • Tight manufacturing and assembly tolerances • Long and slim structure • Good mechanical stability • Support structure • Mechanical error analysis to quantify: • Manufacturing tolerances • Assembly tolerances • Alignment tolerances • Large series production • New manufacturing and assembly technologies required

  11. Open Issues (cont.) Mechanical and thermal stability • Thermal expansion • Influence on field quality (shift of magnetic center) • Deformation of mechanical structure (stress) • Displacement of magnet (transversal) • Cooling flow induced vibrations • Amplitude and frequency • Maximum allowed coolant velocity • Defining flow rate and pressure drop • Stability of magnetic centre • Iron saturation effects • Hysteresis effects • Mechanical deformation due to magnetic forces

  12. Open Issues (cont.) Other important issues • Magnetic measurements • How to measure field quality in small aperture quadrupole? • Method and measurement equipment to be defined • Vacuum chamber integration • Low conductivity due to small aperture • Mechanical support • Limited space in coil window • Corrector optimization • Integrated pulsed (20 ms) H/V steering coils (2 mT) • Requires laminated yokes • Low field quality acceptable? • Constant current distribution vs. corrector coils • Influence on gradient quality and stability of magnetic center? • Eddy currents in the vacuum chamber

  13. Next Steps Detailed Studies addressing open issues • Advanced coil and cooling layout and possible options • Thermal 3D model • 3D Magnetic field analysis • Mechanical error analysis • Advanced yoke manufacturing and assembly techniques • Corrector optimization • Magnet design proposal • Mechanical layout for module integration • Resources needed: 1 FTE*y (mechanical engineer + PhD or Fellow) • Costs: 70 kCHF (mainly for design office) • Delay: 1 year

  14. Next Steps (cont.) Quadrupole mock-up • Design and build a quadrupole mock-up • Part of EuCARD – WP8.3 (Task 2) • Start in 2009 • Purpose of the mock-up: • Simulate mechanical, thermal, and magnetic effects • Model will not provide final magnetic field • Investigate the performance of the stabilisation equipment • Resources needed: 2.2 FTE*y (mechanical engineer + PhD or Fellow) • Costs: 240 kCHF • Delay: 18 months

  15. Next Steps (cont.) Quadrupole Prototype • Design and build full functional Quadrupole • Start: > 2010 ? • Purpose of the prototype: • Validate design, manufacturing and assembly techniques • Evaluate final field quality • Study and validate magnetic measurement method • Study vacuum chamber integration • Study corrector coil performance • Resources needed: ~ 4 FTE*y (mechanical engineer + technical engineer + PhD or Fellow ) • Costs: > 500 kCHF • Delay: > 2 years

  16. Final Focusing Quadrupole

  17. Final Focusing Quadrupole All questions and problems related to the MBQ are also relevant or even more important for the FFG. In the past 10 years, many papers and proposals have been released on this topics. To begin with, a detailed literature research is required to gain full overview on this subject.

  18. Conclusions • A preliminary magnetic design for the CLIC MB quadrupoles has been presented • Open issues have been pointed out • Future studies needed addressing open issues • Mock-up required for stabilization studies • Prototype needed to verify magnetic design and to conclude study

More Related