1 / 14

Runway Safety Areas

Runway Safety Areas. Mark George Survival Factors Division. Runway Safety Areas. Buffer zone 1000 feet beyond runway ends, and 250 feet on each side of runway centerline. 1000 feet (longitudinal). 500 feet (lateral). Runway Safety Areas. Options for improving RSAs:

braima
Download Presentation

Runway Safety Areas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Runway Safety Areas Mark George Survival Factors Division

  2. Runway Safety Areas • Buffer zone 1000 feet beyond runway ends, and 250 feet on each side of runway centerline 1000feet (longitudinal) 500 feet (lateral)

  3. Runway Safety Areas • Options for improving RSAs: • Acquisition of land (to standards) • Relocate or shift runway • Reduction in runway length • Declared distances • Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS)

  4. Runway Safety Areas - EMAS • Engineered Materials Arresting System • Crushable concrete blocks • Attenuates energy as the airplane crushes the blocks • Tunable for “design” airplane and available space • Standard EMAS – 70 knot exit speed • Non-standard EMAS – 40 knot exit speed

  5. Runway Safety Areas - EMAS

  6. RSAs - Chronology of significant events

  7. RSAs - Chronology of significant events

  8. 22L EMAS scheduled completion 10/2007 13C EMAS completed 9/2007 04R EMAS scheduled completion Fall 2007 31C EMAS scheduled completion Fall 2007

  9. Runway Safety Areas • Non-standard EMAS would have stopped the accident airplane • Conclusion: Absence of EMAS contributed to the severity of the accident

More Related