1 / 21

Detailed Plasma and Fluorescence Diagnostics of a Stellar X-Ray Flare

Detailed Plasma and Fluorescence Diagnostics of a Stellar X-Ray Flare. Paola Testa (1) Fabio Reale (2) , Jeremy Drake (3) , Barbara Ercolano (3) , David Huenemoerder (1) , David Garcia-Alvarez (3,4) 1 MIT, 2 Universita’ di Palermo (Italy), 3 SAO , 4 Imperial College.

braima
Download Presentation

Detailed Plasma and Fluorescence Diagnostics of a Stellar X-Ray Flare

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Detailed Plasma and Fluorescence Diagnostics of aStellar X-Ray Flare Paola Testa(1) Fabio Reale(2), Jeremy Drake(3), Barbara Ercolano(3), David Huenemoerder(1), David Garcia-Alvarez(3,4) 1MIT, 2Universita’ di Palermo (Italy),3SAO, 4 Imperial College July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  2. Rationale HETGS observation of the G1 III giant HR 9024 Hertzsprung gap giant,3M, 13R, peak Lx~1032ergs/s (see also Ayres et al 2007, Nordon & Behar 2006) Motivations: • X-ray activity in evolved intermediate mass stars • Coronal structuring • Physics of stellar flares • Plasma diagnostics, and geometry diagnostics: • hydrodynamic loop modeling (Testa et al. 2007, ApJ, 663) • fluorescence emission Diagnostic Tools: Comparison of results from the two independent analyses July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  3. HETGS Spectrum HR 9024:Hertzsprung gap giant,3M, 13R, peak Lx~1032ergs/s July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  4. Light curve and hardness ratio HR 9024:Hertzsprung gap giant,3M, 13R, peak Lx~1032ergs/s July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  5. X-ray activity of intermediate-mass giants • HR 9024: Hertzsprung gap giant,3M, 13R, Lx~1032ergs/s • Evolved intermediate mass star: what are the characteristics of the X-ray production mechanisms? How is the corona structured (typical size, filling factors, …)? (e.g., Ayres et al. 1998, Ayres et al. 2007) • These giants are thought to develop a dynamo when they enter the convective region of the H-R diagram, also given their typical fast rotation in MS (when they are non-coronal late-B/early-A dwarfs) • Variability: flares are very unusual in these massive evolved giants July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  6. Hydrodynamic Modeling • For the hydrodynamic modeling we use information mainly from the continuum that is strong, and it probes the hot flaring plasma: • we derive T and EM by fitting the continuum in line-free regions (according to both APED and CHIANTI) • Loop Model: • start with an educated guess for the parameters • synthesize the HETG spectrum of the solution • repeat the analysis carried out on the observed spectrum and compare the same quantities • refine the model if needed July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  7. Hydrodynamic Modeling MEG cts/s T T vs. n EM • (Testa et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 1232)

  8. Hydrodynamic Modeling • Model parameters: • loop semi-length L = 5· 1011 cm • ~R/2, as in normal coronae • cross-section radius r ~ 4.5· 1010 cm, i.e. aspect ratio r/L~0.1 as in typical solar loops • impulsive heating (15 ks; starting 8 ks before the beginning of the observation) at the footpoints; volumetric heating ~ 4 erg/cm3/s, heating rate ~ 1033 erg/s July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  9. Hydrodynamic Modeling • Cross-check of results: • light curves in strong spectral features: • Fe XXV, • Si XIV, • Mg XII • (Testa et al. 2007, ApJ) July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  10. Hydrodynamic Modeling • Cross-check of results: • EM(T) • (flare) • (Testa et al. 2007, ApJ) July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  11. Hydrodynamic Modeling • Cross-check of results: • cross-section radius - we derive estimates from the normalization of different light curves: • (a) integrated MEG counts (r ~ 4.9· 1010 cm), • (b) EM from continuum (r ~ 4.3 · 1010 cm), • (c) single spectral features (r ~ 4.8 · 1010 cm); • they all agree with each other within a 15% July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  12. Geometry Diagnostics from Fluorescence In the HEG spectrum there is evidence of Fe K fluorescence (1.94Å, 6.4keV) that provides an independent diagnostic for the coronal geometry HEG July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  13. Geometry Diagnostics from Fluorescence • the fluorescence efficiency depends on (e.g., Bai 1979): • the solid angle subtended by the cold material as seen by the X-ray source h • the inclination angle at which the reflecting surface is viewed by the observer  • the Fe abundance of the cold material July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  14. Measured value (1) Prediction from hd model Geometry Diagnostics from Fluorescence July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  15. Results • the X-ray characteristics of HR9024 are typical of normal coronae but scaled up to the larger stellar radius • HETGSallows for the first time to test HD models predictions for single spectral features: we find very good agreement at least for the hottest feature of FeXXV • the HEG spectrum shows evidence of Fe K fluorescence emission, and its analysis provides an independent check of the results of the hydrodynamic modeling: • the fluorescence efficiency predicted from the HD model is in agreement with the observed one within the uncertainties July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  16. Thank you! July 11 2007 - CXC X-ray spectroscopy workshop

  17. Hydrodynamic Modeling • Cross-check of results: • light curves in strong spectral features: • Fe XXV,Si XIV, Mg XII

  18. Hydrodynamic Modeling t=0-10ks Comparison of MEG observed spectrum with predictions of loop model t=10-15ks t=15-30ks t=30-45ks

  19. Hydrodynamic Modeling t=0-10ks Comparison of MEG observed spectrum with predictions of loop model t=10-15ks t=15-30ks t=30-45ks

  20. Hydrodynamic Modeling Apex T Apex ne max v Apex p

  21. Hydrodynamic Modeling

More Related