1 / 51

Overview of the Experience of Long-term Insurers in SA for 2008

Overview of the Experience of Long-term Insurers in SA for 2008. Tienie Hamman 17/19 November 2009. Why are we here?.

brady-boyer
Download Presentation

Overview of the Experience of Long-term Insurers in SA for 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of the Experience of Long-term Insurers in SA for 2008 Tienie Hamman 17/19 November 2009

  2. Why are we here? To provide information to industry on representative SA Statutory Valuation Method bases reported in 2008, including comparisons with previous years’ data and some comparisons with actual experience.

  3. What will we show you? • Brief overview of the LT insurance market in 2008 • Review the representative: • Reported valuation assumptions (G10.x) and • Reported actual experience (B - statements) for certain key elements in a valuation basis

  4. Overview of the LT Insurance Market in 2008

  5. Overview: Rankings

  6. Overview: Number of insurers & total assets, split by year-end

  7. Overview: Business class

  8. Overview: Insurance license

  9. Overview: Growth per business class

  10. Overview: Growth by license

  11. Overview: Key indicators

  12. Overview: Key indicators

  13. Overview:Asset compositionper industry

  14. Mortality

  15. Mortality • In the graphed rates, we tried to determine representative mortality rates • For assured lives we used 100% of the SA85/90 (heavy) ultimate table to place weighted rates into perspective • For annuitants we used 100% of the a(55) table to put weighted average rates into perspective

  16. Assurance mortality

  17. Change in mortality of assured lives

  18. AIDS loading comparison

  19. AIDS loading by industry

  20. Annuitant mortality by industry

  21. Change in mortality of annuitants from 2007 to 2008

  22. Mortality: Actual vs. expected • For assurance products: • Individual: 83% (81%) • Group: 89% (94%) • For annuity products: • Individual: 115% (114%) • Group: 97% (88%)

  23. Morbidity: Actual vs. expected • For lump sum disability: • Individual: 74% (75%) • Group: 66% (65%) • For income disability: • Individual: 42% (28%) • Group: 68% (74%)

  24. Discount Rates

  25. Assumed central discount rate Page 25

  26. Observed investment yield

  27. Investment yield assumed vs. actual

  28. Cumulative distribution of assumed real returns

  29. Expenses

  30. Split of expense experience(Statement C7)

  31. Expense inflation assumption

  32. Actual expense inflation 9% 4% 21% 8% 22% 21% 3% 79%

  33. Initial per policy expense assumption

  34. Actual initial expense(individual business)

  35. Renewal expense assumption(per policy)

  36. Actual operating expense(individual business)

  37. Capital Adequacy Requirement (CAR)

  38. Overview – CAR cover • Total CAR is 2.56% of total liabilities • This is a 4.36% increase from the previous year

  39. Distribution of CAR

  40. TCAR Breakdown

  41. IOCAR Breakdown – Dec year-ends

  42. Operational and Credit risk • Operational risk • Total amount of ± R4.6bn • Comprises 17% of total CAR held • Comprises 0.5% of total Assets • Credit risk • Total amount of ± R2.9bn • Comprises 10.7% of total CAR held • Comprises 0.3% of total Assets

  43. Reduction in CAR by using Management action - over time

  44. Proportion of insurers applying management action

  45. Management Action • TCAR wasn’t reduced by management action • Elements of OCAR reduced: • Investment risk – reduced by 66% • Worst investment return – reduced by 42% • Resilience risk – reduced by 66% • Annuitant mortality fluctuation risk – reduced by 12% • Morbidity fluctuation risk – reduced by 11% • Operational risk - reduced by 3% • Credit risk – reduced by 23% • No reduction in Embedded Investment Derivatives Component

  46. Withdrawal Rates

  47. Assumed lapses per business class

  48. Assumed surrenders per business class

  49. Assumed lapses per industry

  50. Observed withdrawals per industry

More Related