1 / 15

ARMENIA CASE STUDY: Climate Change Impact Study for Lusadzor Village in Tavush Marz , Armenia

Regional Workshop on Climate Change and Local Action. ARMENIA CASE STUDY: Climate Change Impact Study for Lusadzor Village in Tavush Marz , Armenia. Naira Aslanyan September 19-22, 2011 Bratislava, Slovak Republic. Armenia’s Climate Profile.

bowie
Download Presentation

ARMENIA CASE STUDY: Climate Change Impact Study for Lusadzor Village in Tavush Marz , Armenia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regional Workshop on Climate Change and Local Action ARMENIA CASE STUDY: Climate Change Impact Study for Lusadzor Village in TavushMarz, Armenia Naira Aslanyan September 19-22, 2011 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

  2. Armenia’s Climate Profile • Climate: from dry subtropical to frosty highlands • Observed climate aridification: temp. incraese by 0.850C (1929-2007), precipitation decrease by 6% (1935-2004). • Extreme weather events & natural disasters: Droughts, seasonal flooding, hailstorm, early frost, landslides, mudflows, rockfalls, forest fires • Water stresses: water reserves in snow decreased annually by 5-10% during (1961-90) • Forest area: 10.4% of territory, 20,000 ha suffers by pests, 168,000USD damaged due to forest fires (2004-2009) • CC scenarios by 2100: Temp. increase - by 5.80C, precipitation decrease – by 9% • projected consequences of CC (by 2100) – reduction of: river flow – 24.4%, snow cover – 20-40%, soil humidiy – 10-30% (by 2050), productivity of arable lands – 15-34% Aggravation of health/epidemiological/ situation – increased cases of infectious diseases (including water born), heat waves, atypical diseases

  3. CC Proofing Activities in Armenia

  4. Rationale : Programme supports local development in climate sensitive area (floods, mudflows, frost, hail); Focuse on rural infrastructure rehabilitation and agriculture development. Lusadzor Project activities: Access to non-cultivated arable land; Construction of irrigation system operating through gravity flow; Construction of internal network for potable water; Planting of persimmon orchards and distribution of seedlings to rural households; Creation of revolving funds of wheat, maize and potato seeds. Climate Relevance: Situation analysis recognizesdextremeweather events and climate disasters as important risks hindering local development; However, no target efforts have been made to address these risks in local planning and pilot activities. Objective of CC proofing: Minimize CC impact on CDP outputs; Foster activities which can increase the adaptive capacity of communities. UNDP CDP Screening

  5. Lusadzor: a border village in Ijevan district of Tavushmarz Elevation: 700 m Types of terrain: low and middle mountain steppe, and low mountain dry steppe Territory: 626 ha with 73.8% agricultural land Soil category: mountain-steppe Vegetation type: wood land Average annual temperature & precipitation: 110C & 600 mm; on average, 150 sunny days Population: 359 men and 365 women # of inhabited households in 2007: 197 Employed in agriculture: 33,5% of total local population Non agricultural activities: at commercial counters, a stone-working worshop, preferrite and dolomite mines, other Education level: above 16 years old, 25% have higher/secondary/vocational degrees Receiving family allowances: 22.8% of the households Lusadzor Community Profile

  6. Rrisk assessment - Top down approach • Climate disasters prone area: • floods, mudflows, frost, hail; • Community development challenges: • low agricultural productivity, • land abandonment (poor irrigation, access to arable lands) • poor rural infrastructure (housing issues, poot roads and bridge connecting to arable lands in the village) • remoteness of markets and low prices • climate variability and projected CC expected to exacerbate the development challenges • Needs to address the challenges: • Information gaps for diagnosis: low resolution scenarios (national level, derived from regional scenarios); need for bottom-up V&A assessment: • Observable changes, shifts in seasons; • Type and magnitude of losses due to the hazards; • Current coping mechanisms and capacities; • Priority needs to address additional vulnerabilities • Need for site-specific projections.

  7. Risk and V&A assessment - Bottom-up approach • Interviews: • - Local Communities • - Representatives of Agr. Dept, TavushMarz Administration • 1. Effectiveness • 2. Cost • 3. Adequace for current climate • 4. Technical feasibility • Anallysis of meteo data: • - Ijevan Met. Post • - Berd Met. Post Methodology • Expert Judgement

  8. Findings • The frequency and intensity of climatic hazards has increased • There are tangible economic losses due to climatic hazards (washed out lands, damaged crops and infrastructure. In 2004-2007: 57,500 USD) • lack of information (weather forecasts, risk mitigation measures) is one of the main barriers to coping with climate risks Data for 1991-2006 compared with 1961-1990 • air temperature increase - the highest in summer • precipitation increase in spring & summer and decrease in fall & winter Monthly average T (0C) & P (mm) 1961-1990 with max and min 1991-2006

  9. Projected CC for north-east of Armenia Based on the report “Model Simulations of Climate Change over Armenia Region”developed under SNC

  10. Screening of Lusadzor Project Activities • Project activities screened for: • climate change sensitivity • adaptation value (positive or negative) using expert judgment and taking into account predicted climate change impacts for the area Findings: • The sensitivity assessment of the Lusadzor Project found that the project’s outcomes are not at high risk from climate change • Some of the project activities have positive adaptation value • Project activities are not sufficient to build the adaptive capacity of the local population and improve their livelihood in the face of climate change

  11. Economic assessment of adaptation measures Effectiveness: benefits, damages avoided or mitigated, losses and associated costs avoided or minimized Cost: incremental to “business as usual” Adequacy for current climate: benefits under the current climatic conditions and future scenarios Technical feasibility: capacity and means to implement the measure Assessment Criteria (where: + low, ++ medium, +++ high)

  12. Adaptation measures (total costs - appr. 213,000 USD) Transformation of non-cultivated lands to arable lands. (81,000 USD) - Being implemented by MCA Improving local seasonal forecasting and early warning: flood early warning, weather forecasting, droughts etc. (720 USD) – Proposed to be implemented by local authorities, Ijevanhydromet station Farm piloting / demonstration of adaptation measures. (124,837 USD) – Proposed to be supported by various donors Facilitation of community meetings and farmer trainings on climate risk management to identify and help develop farmers coping and adaptation strategies. (2,558 USD) – Proposed to be implemented by local authorities Creation of communal social nets and common pool of resources to cope with major stressors in the community. (2,654 USD) – Being implemented by UNDP Armenia Incorporation of adaptation measures into the integrated dev. plans for communities, e.g. infrastructure development works.(1,187 USD) – Proposed to be implemented with the support of meteorologists and hydrologists from Ijevanhydromet station

  13. Key Challenges • Constraints with meteorological data availability; • Reliability of available information; • Proper assessment of damage caused by climatic hazards is not comprehensive and periodic – due to the absence of insurance system; • Farms are small and have limited coping capacity Lessons Learned • Time consuming exercise due to participatory process; • Some of project activities had adaptation value – important to identify before proposing an adaptation measure; • There is always scope to improve adaptation capacity to increase effectiveness and sustainability of the project; • Important to focus on cost-effective and feasible measures • Important to introduce CRM at project design stage, as part of feasibility, so that additional costs do not incur to the project budget • There are apparent links between CC adaptation and disaster risk reduction – important to looked at them in parrallel while deisgning a project.

  14. Local Actions – Lusadzor(2008-2011) UNDP CDP - Greenhouses established MCA - Collection Centre constructed for collecting, sorting, cold storage and further marketing of agricultural products in communities of TavushMarz UNDP CDP-potable water network reconstructed MCA - Rehabilitation of tertiary canal in Lusadzor • UNDP CDP – 120 rural households engaged in artificial insemination of cattle – “Zebu” Other: Trainings/Awareness raising events on CC organized by UNDP & OXFAM for local communities/ authorities of Lusadzor MCA - Gravity system in Lusadzor constructed for irrigation of 300 hectares - (2 pumping stations to be eliminated- resulting in 0.6 mln. Kwt/hour electricity saving). UNDP - solar water heater installed on cooperative kitchen

  15. THANK YOU Government Building #3, Yerevan, Republic Square 5th Floor, Suite 533 Phone: (37410) 58-39-20, Fax: (37410) 58-39-33 E-mail: naira.aslanyan@undp.org URL: www.nature-ic.am

More Related