1 / 14

‘Exploring the language barrier to engagement in youth justice assessment interview practice’

This project aims to identify and examine patterns of problematic discourse and effective management in assessment interviews within the youth justice system. Through linguistic analysis and data collection, the project team plans to develop a toolkit for effective communication and offer valuable insights into assessment interviews.

bowersox
Download Presentation

‘Exploring the language barrier to engagement in youth justice assessment interview practice’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ‘Exploring the language barrier to engagement in youth justice assessment interview practice’ Ralph Morton r.morton@lboro.ac.uk

  2. Outline • Project Team • What are we planning to do? • How are we planning to do this? • Timetable • Numbers • What we need from you • What we hope to offer • Any questions and concerns?

  3. Project Team • Stephen Case, Professor of Criminology, Loughborough University • research interests: youth justice; youth crime prevention; social justice, particularly the promotion of positive, children first ways of working with children in the Youth Justice System. • Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, Professor of English and Applied Linguistics, Swansea University -research interests: discourse analysis; media discourse; cross cultural communication.

  4. Ralph Morton, Research Associate, Loughborough University - Research interests: Corpus Linguistics, Forensic Linguistics, Professional Discourse • ‘Exploring the language barrier to engagement in youth justice assessment interview practice’ project • -> Using linguistic analysis to examine communication in assessment interviews

  5. What are we planning to do? • ‘To identify and examine patterns of problematic discourse within assessment interviews’ • ‘To identify and examine patterns of effective management within assessment interviews’ • Examine the interview context and how this might effect communication • Develop, test, and deliver a set of protocols to serve as ‘a model for effective communication’ Leicestershire, Gwynedd, Walsall, Surrey

  6. How are we planning to do this? • Record assessment interviews • Linguistic analyses of interaction • Questionnaires re: experiences in the Youth Justice System (practitioners and young people) • Semi-structured interviews re: experiences in Youth Justice System (practitioners and young people), incorporating findings from analyses • Bring this information together to produce a ‘toolkit’ for effective communication in interviews • Pilot, refine, and finalise toolkit for application in assessments

  7. Recording • Video or audio? • Video would provide much more information • Gesture, Gaze, Posture, all ‘resources for making meaning’ • Also some evidence that body language affects how meaning is perceived • Our intention is to be as unobtrusive as possible - Do not want to affect assessments - From a research perspective we do not want abnormal data • One recorder - Researcher operated or practitioner operated?

  8. Privacy • All data will be anonymised. Video and audio data will be masked. Identifying details such as names and locations will be removed before any results are shared • Focus of the study is interaction, not the details of individual cases • Real identities of participants will be stored on password-protected hard-drives only accessible to the three researchers on the project • Personal data will be processed in private locations • All personal data collected for the purposes of this project will be destroyed when it concludes in March 2019

  9. Timetable • Phase 1 August 2017- February 2018 - Observe and Record assessment interviews • Linguistic analysis • Phase 2 March-June 2018 • Questionnaires • Interviews • Phase 1 + Phase 2 => Phase 3 • Phase 3 • July-August 2018 • - Develop draft 1 of the toolkit • - Test toolkit • Phase 4 • September 2018-February 2019 • - Develop final toolkit • - Provide training sessions

  10. Numbers Phase One: Assessment interviews • Overall target of 50 interviews between the two YOTs • 20 assessment interviews per YOT • Initial AssetPlus assessments and review assessments • If possible at least some initial and review assessments of same case • 5-10 other interview types Phase Two: Questionnaires/Interviews • Questionnaires - all participants from Phase 1 (+?) • Interviews - as many participants from Phase 1 as possible

  11. Phase Three: Focus Group - 4 practitioners, 4 young people per YOT • Phase Four: Final toolkit and dissemination - As many practitioners as can/want to attend workshop sessions

  12. What we need from you • Access to assessment interviews • Help to identify suitable cases • Help with approaching parents and securing permissions from them and the young people • Access to planning materials • Insight on the assessment process through questionnaire, interviews, focus group

  13. What we will offer • ‘Toolkit’ for supporting best practice • Linguistics/communicative insights into assessment interviews (useful beyond YJ context) • To map your concerns and experiences onto the research • Workshops • (Feedback for young people) • Dissemination

  14. Any questions or concerns? Contacts: Stephen Case s.case@lboro.ac.uk Nuria Lorenzo-Dusn.lorenzo-dus@swansea.ac.uk Ralph Morton r.morton@lboro.ac.uk

More Related