1 / 5

BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking

Rajiv Papneja Bhavani Parise Sue Hares Dean Lee Ilya Varlashkin. BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking. Nov. 8, 2013. Where We Are. draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-00 Author team: Rajiv Papneja , Bhavani Parise , Sue Hares, Dean Lee, Ilya Varlashkin

bowen
Download Presentation

BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BMWG@IETF88 Rajiv Papneja Bhavani Parise Sue Hares Dean Lee Ilya Varlashkin BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking Nov. 8, 2013

  2. Where We Are • draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-00 • Author team: Rajiv Papneja, BhavaniParise, Sue Hares, Dean Lee, IlyaVarlashkin • Presented and solicited feedback from IDR at IETF-83 • Published as a workgroup item • Reviewed by Verizon, AT&T, Cisco & Compass • Performed Benchmarking tests based on the proposed methodology at Ixia labs. Presented the findings to BMWG group and also at MPLS Ethernet World Congress 2013, Paris • Positive feedback from EMEA carriers • Responded to the number of iteration needed per test • The number of iteration is already taken into consideration in the test cases

  3. Latest Update • A NEM dev test team has adopted: • 5.1.1 RIB-IN Convergence • 5.2.2 Physical Link Failure on Remote/Emulator End • 5.6 BGP Route Withdrawal Convergence Time • 5.7 BGP Path Attribute Change Convergence Time • Automation with regression test bed in progress

  4. Feedback • Consistent test results • Tested 100K to 4M routes • Validated with live BGP routes • Ran 5 iterations with consistent results • Needed to wait longer than 3 KeepAlive plus additional time needed for specific DUT – already addressed in the draft • Needed to validate DUT with no packet loss before executing convergence test

  5. BMWG@IETF88 Next Step • Clarify packet loss validation in section 5 • The draft is ready to move on

More Related