1 / 16

Risk Benefit and Conclusions

George Sledge, MD Indiana University School of Medicine. Risk Benefit and Conclusions. Do We Need a New Chemoprevention Agent?. Breast cancer continues to represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality Few women actually receive tamoxifen as chemoprevention for breast cancer

boone
Download Presentation

Risk Benefit and Conclusions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. George Sledge, MDIndiana University School of Medicine Risk Benefit and Conclusions

  2. Do We Need a New Chemoprevention Agent? • Breast cancer continues to represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality • Few women actually receive tamoxifen as chemoprevention for breast cancer • Real toxicities (VTE, uterine cancer) limit its use • Perception that it is a “cancer drug” with poor risk/benefit ratio

  3. Raloxifene Demonstrates Efficacyin Postmenopausal WomenAcross a Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk 56% RR 1.02 71% 44%

  4. Confirmation of Raloxifene’s Effectiveness Relative to Tamoxifen in STAR STAR Primary Analysis RR (95% CI) = 1.02 (0.82, 1.27) STAR Non-inferiority Analysis Proportion retention of tamoxifen’s effect* (95% CI) = 97% (65%, 128%) * Tamoxifen’s effect based on women 50 years or older in P-1

  5. Raloxifene as an Alternative to Tamoxifen: Benefit • Similar efficacy with regard to prevention of invasive breast cancer • Less effect on noninvasive cancers

  6. Non-Invasive Breast Cancerin Placebo-Controlled StudiesMORE, CORE, RUTH SEER 5/2576 3/2557 2/1274 5/2716 5/5057 11/5044 (N=5133) (N=3990) (N=10,101) SEER annual US incidence rate per 1,000 in white women ≥50 (2000 data)

  7. Efficacy and Important Safety Outcomes STAR FAVORS TAMOXIFEN FAVORS RALOXIFENE P=0.057 * P=0.055 * * * *P < 0.05 vs. tamoxifen Difference in Number of Events (95% CI) per 1000 Women/Yr

  8. Differences in Outcomes forRaloxifene versus TamoxifenSTAR Difference in # of events per 1000treated per 5 years (RALOXIFENE VS. TAMOXIFEN) Outcome Non-invasive breast cancer 3 more DCIS only 2 more Hysterectomy 40 fewer† Hyperplasia 20 fewer† Uterine cancer 4 fewer Venous thromboembolism 6 fewer† Deep vein thrombosis 3 fewer Pulmonary embolism 3 fewer Cataracts 10 fewer† Cataract surgery 9 fewer† †P < 0.05

  9. Invasive Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Compares Favorablywith Other Prevention Therapies *NNT = number of patients needed to treat for 1 year to prevent 1 outcome 1Sever PS et al., Lancet. 2003 Apr 5;361(9364):1149-58 2MRC Working Party Br Med J 1992;304:405-412 3Berger JS et al. JAMA 2006;295:306-313 4Fisher B et al., J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 16;90(18):1371-88.

  10. Postmenopausal women at high risk for breast cancer should now have a choice

  11. Raloxifene and Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis • Well established, FDA approved agent for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis • Reduced risk of invasive breast cancer observed in MORE has been confirmed in RUTH and STAR • Clinically important benefit for these women

  12. P-1 (age≥50) Placebo MORE Placebo Invasive Breast Cancer and Vertebral Fracture MORE and P-1 12 10 8 Invasive Breast Cancer (No. per 1000/yr) 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Clinical Vertebral Fracture (No. per 1000/yr)

  13. P-1 (age≥50) Placebo MORE 3.6 fewer Placebo Tamoxifen 3.1 fewer Raloxifene Invasive Breast Cancer and Vertebral Fracture MORE and P-1 12 10 8 Invasive Breast Cancer (No. per 1000/yr) 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Clinical Vertebral Fracture (No. per 1000/yr)

  14. Invasive Breast Cancer and Vertebral Fracture MORE and P-1 12 10 P-1 (age≥50) 8 Invasive Breast Cancer (No. per 1000/yr) Placebo MORE 6 3.6 fewer Placebo 4 Tamoxifen 3.1 fewer 5.2 fewer 0.5 fewer 2 Raloxifene 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Clinical Vertebral Fracture (No. per 1000/yr)

  15. Postmenopausal women considering raloxifene for treatment of osteoporosis should be informed about the potential additional benefit on their risk of invasive breast cancer Slide Modified: Memo:

  16. Conclusion • Since 1998 an estimated 22 million postmenopausal women worldwide have received raloxifene to prevent or treat osteoporosis. • Clinical trials involving more than 37,000 postmenopausal women now provide information on the benefits and risks of the use of raloxifene to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer. • The benefit-risk is favorable in postmenopausal women at high risk for breast cancer and in postmenopausal women taking raloxifene for osteoporosis.

More Related