1 / 27

Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models

Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models. Dr Judy Rubinsztein Dr Marelna Van Rensburg Dr Zerak Al- Salihy , Dr Deborah Girling , Dr L ouise Lafortune , Dr Murali Kartha , Prof Carol Brayne. Aims.

boone
Download Presentation

Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models Dr Judy Rubinsztein Dr Marelna Van Rensburg Dr Zerak Al-Salihy, Dr Deborah Girling, Dr L ouiseLafortune, Dr MuraliKartha, Prof Carol Brayne

  2. Aims • Evaluate average unit cost to secondary care for patients presenting with memory problems in a Memory Clinic based service (Gp A) and a Traditional ( CMHT based) service ( Gp B). • Evaluate quality of diagnostic service offered to patients and carers.

  3. Methods • Adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) • Questionnaire about quality of diagnostic service provided, devised for study

  4. Unit Costs for Health and Social Care (2011)

  5. Quality Questionnaire: Diagnostic Assessment Response times for assessment Dementia blood screen Pre-diagnostic counselling Examination of cognition, behaviour, functioning Advanced planning discussions Assessment of risk

  6. Typical pathway and costs for Gp A

  7. Group B

  8. Demographics

  9. Diagnoses (NS)

  10. Dementia Blood Screen from GP Significantly more in Group A Fisher Exact P=0.02

  11. Pre-Diagnostic Counselling

  12. Days to be seen

  13. Diagnostic Assessment: informal Evidence of informal assessment ( NS differences) in nearly all of patients including assessments of 1) Functioning 2) Behaviour 3) Global severity 4) Depression 5) Carer assessment : Gp A> Gp B

  14. Diagnostic assessment (formal scales) Formal assessment Gp A> Gp B • Functioning (P<0.0001) ( BDI) • Behaviour (P<0.0001) ( CBI) • Global (P<0.0001) (HoNos, EQ5D)

  15. Brain Scans

  16. Risk Assessment

  17. Post Diagnostic Advice

  18. Medications Prescribed (65%)

  19. Diagnostic info 100% of letters to GP had diagnosis

  20. Copying of letters to Pts/ Carers Group A Group B

  21. Total Costs Pounds Group A Group B

  22. Costs by Type (Means)

  23. Conclusions • Costs less for Gp A than Gp B but not significantly so. • BUT, Gp A (memory clinic service) can offer a higher quality service with more specialist and multi-disciplinary care.

  24. Outcome of Study • Valuable input to both services re cost and quality of service • Developed useful cost and quality tools for evaluating a memory service • Cost data may be useful to Unit Costs for Health and Social Care compendium • Planning an academic paper!

  25. What did I learn? • In real world, services change and develop. • Neither services are the same as when project done! • Involving staff with data collection/discussion at both ends critical to success. • Similar stakeholder info re perceived quality of services would be useful.

  26. Acknowledgements • *Dr Judy Rubinsztein • ¥Dr Marelna Van Rensburg • **Dr Zerak Al-Salihy, • ¥ D Girling, • *Dr L Lafortune • *Dr MuraliKartha, • *Prof Carol Brayne • *Receive support from NIHR CLAHRC, University of Cambridge, • ¥ CPFT= Cambridge and Peterborough FT • **Norfolk and Suffolk FT

  27. Acknowledgements • Sam Norton (statistician, CLAHRC) • John Battersby ( ERPHO, advice on demographic matching) • Multidisciplinary staff in both Groups A and B

More Related