1 / 9

Mixed, but are they Mixing Social interaction in a Mixed Inner-city Neighbourhood in Post-reform Shanghai

Why is mix important?. In the west, urban policy increasingly encourages mixed (tenure) development and gentrification (DETR, 1999, 2000; Smith, 2002; Lees, 2003). 3 main arguments:

bonita
Download Presentation

Mixed, but are they Mixing Social interaction in a Mixed Inner-city Neighbourhood in Post-reform Shanghai

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    4. So far studies from various parts of the world have shown that: Little cross tenure social mixing in mixed tenure estates in Western European contexts, esp. UK and Netherlands (Kleinhans, 2004; Atkinson and Kintrea, 2000, 2001) Scenarios of ‘Social tectonics’ found in gentrified areas: Gentrifiers tended to self segregate and only interact amongst themselves (Robson and Butler, 2001; Butler, 2003). Others case studies also found little cross socio-economic class interaction between: Dwellers of new middle-income infill redevelopments and adjacent social housing residents in downtown Montreal (Rose, 2004); Gentrifiers and non-gentrifiers in poor Black neighbourhoods in NYC (Freeman, 2006), Middle-income developments along the Thames with lower-income neighbours in adjacent neighbourhoods in London (Davidson, in-coming)

    8. Survey method

    9. Conclusions

More Related