1 / 28

2008-2009 Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality

2008-2009 Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality. Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar. Today’s Goals. Summary of goals of this grant program (See application for specific requirements) Anticipating the data collection for funded projects

bo-mooney
Download Presentation

2008-2009 Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2008-2009 Title II, Part A(3)Competitive Grant Programfor Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar

  2. Today’s Goals • Summary of goals of this grant program (See application for specific requirements) • Anticipating the data collection for funded projects • Looking ahead to enhanced data collection • How to apply using the MEGS system

  3. Professional Development for teachers, principals, and/or paraprofessionals

  4. Supports partnerships between high-need LEAs, college/departments of teacher education, and college/departments of arts and sciences

  5. What is the Potential? • Up to $200,000 for a 16 month period • $770,000 • 4 awards • At least $100,000 to serve teachers of small or rural LEAs as long as they meet the high poverty requirement.

  6. Small, Rural and PSAs • Rural—any LEA given a 7 or 8 locale code by virtue of its location within a community with population less than 25,000 and greater than or equal to 2,500. • LEAs and PSAs – (Public School Academies or Charter Schools)

  7. Deadline for Application Deadline for submission: 11:59 p.m. April 24, 2009

  8. Categories • Partnerships for Professional Learning Opportunities in English Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, or Social Studies • Address MDE Content Expectations • Build instruction delivery skills • Build assessment skills – both teachers and principals • Meet goals for all students, including implementation of UDL

  9. Categories continued: • Partnerships for Professional Learning Opportunities that Result in Highly Qualified Status or Endorsement for Grades 6-12 Special Education Teachers • Partnerships for Professional Development to Increase the Skills of Middle School Pre-Algebra and Algebra Teachers and/or High School Algebra Teachers to Instruct Students of All Ability Levels

  10. All partnership projects must address: • MDE content expectations, • educator professional learning needs, and • learning needs of all students, addressing Michigan’s Vision and Principles of Universal Education

  11. High Need LEA(s) LEA serving not fewer than 10,000 children from low income families OR20.0% or more students living below the poverty line ANDhigh percentage of teachers teaching outside their area of training ORhigh percentage of teachers teaching with an emergency, provisional, or temporary certification

  12. Minimum Partners • College of IHE that prepares teachers • College of Arts and Sciences and • One or more high need LEA

  13. Remember …. • Categories • Nature of the partnership • Tuition OR staff salary • Increased data required • Anticipate approval in May

  14. Evaluation Changes • State-level evaluation – 5.0% of each award • Assessment of program and deeper analysis of artifacts (teacher, student) for a sample of awardees • A plan to conduct lesson/classroom observations • Extensive data requirements for everyone (may constitute the majority of the final report)

  15. Of Special Note….. • A minimum of 90 hours of content-based Professional Development • LEA poverty as shown in the 2005 Census • Evidence of planning with private, nonprofit schools and consultation before figuring budget

  16. Of Special Note….. • Professional development in deep content for the not-yet highly qualified. Must open to not-yet highly qualified up to registration maximum. (Deep content knowledge and improved instructional delivery are the goals.)

  17. RFP Specifications • Specifications are shown on MEGS, as well as Help Screens throughout the application.

  18. Priorities • Research-based, addressing Michigan’s Vision and Standards for Professional Development • Data linking proposal to student learning and teacher need, based on student learning data • Emphasis on Michigan’s content expectations to attain deep content knowledge • Emphasis on improving instructional delivery, incorporating technology and Universal Design for Learning

  19. Other required components for the proposed program • Be collaboratively planned • Address continuance of teacher development (novice through veteran) • Incorporate Technology, UDL • Be based on current, scientifically-based research

  20. Important to Remember • Intensity and focus are more important than large numbers of participants • The nature of the partnership is a critical element. Small, direct partnerships rather than large, indirect alliances • Budget – Special rule, i.e., no one partner USES more than 50% of the award

  21. This grant opportunity is aligned with the following: • NCLB-highly qualified teacher in every classroom • SBE’s Strategic Goal-primary emphasis on priority schools and students • SBE’s Task Force Recommendations- Ensuring Excellent Educators Elevating Education Leadership Embracing the Information Age

  22. Summer Institutes • Intense focus on specific content and instructional delivery strategies • Must have follow-up provided periodically throughout the year • 90 Hours for Highly Qualified • Not a smorgasbord for PD grazing

  23. Links • Title II Guidance: www.ed.gov/programs/teacherqual/guidance.pdf • RFP, Application and List of Qualifying Districts (Minimum of 20.0% Poverty): www.michigan.gov/mde under GRANTS • Identifying and Implementing Educational Practices Supported by Rigorous Evidence: A User Friendly Guide, U.S. Dept. of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (Dec. 2003). http://ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/rigorousevid/rigorousevid.pdf

  24. Links (cont’d) • Rigorous Evidence: • What Works in the Elementary School - http://www.nsdc.org/connect/projects/elwhatworks.pdf • What Works in the High School –http://www.nsdc.org/connect/projects/hswhatworks.pdf

  25. Links (cont’d) • Rigorous evidence • The What Works Clearinghouse – http://www.w-w-c.org/ • The Promising Practices Network – http://www.promisingpractices.net/ • The International Campbell Collaboration – http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/fralibrary.html • Social Programs That Work - http:..www.excelgov.org/displaycontent.asp?Keyword=prppcsocial

  26. About the grant program:Donna L. Hamilton HamiltonD3@michigan.gov at 517-241-4546 About MEGS: MEGS Help Manual at www.michigan.gov/documents/MEGS_manewest_35379_7.doc or Claudia Nicol at NicolC@michigan.gov or 517-335-1151

More Related