1 / 28

Astronomical Seeing

Astronomical Seeing. B. Waddington 6/15/10. Just To Be “Clear”…. Seeing is NOT transparency, sky darkness, or a general metric of “goodness” It relates to “turbulence”, “twinkle”, or “jitter” (none of which are correct terms)

bmcmartin
Download Presentation

Astronomical Seeing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Astronomical Seeing B. Waddington 6/15/10

  2. Just To Be “Clear”…. • Seeing is NOT transparency, sky darkness, or a general metric of “goodness” • It relates to “turbulence”, “twinkle”, or “jitter” (none of which are correct terms) • It can be visually estimated according to the “Pickering Scale” http://www.damianpeach.com/pickering.htm

  3. Cornell University lecture notes

  4. Why Is The Wavefront Distorted? • Air has a refractive index (n), which affects • The speed of light (phase) • How the light is refracted (angle) • Small scale pressure/temperature changes cause changes in the index of refraction • Small cells having different temperatures can persist

  5. Why Is The Wavefront Distorted? • So, neighboring air “cells” can have different optical properties • Just like hundreds of lenses moving in and out of your line of sight • This is not a good thing...

  6. Physics of Seeing • Plane light wave moving through non-uniform medium undergoes phase and amplitude fluctuations • When focused, the wave front creates an image that varies in intensity, sharpness, and position

  7. Physics of Seeing • These “seeing” effects are called • Scintillation (brightness and break-up) • Image motion (angle) • Blurring (combination of both) • Integration of these effects during a long exposure results in fat stars and loss of detail – blurring predominates

  8. Short exposure, scintillation Long exposure, blurring Cornell University lecture notes

  9. Cell Sizes • Typical size of these thermal “cells” matters • Referred to as R0 in seeing and optics models (dependent on wavelength) • Roughly equivalent to maximum cell size that produces only “tilt” distortion • Diameter of telescope relative to R0 (D/ R0) determines seeing characteristics

  10. Cell Sizes • Telescope aperture < typical cell size • Scintillation, movement predominate • Resolution will scale with aperture • Typical for many guide scope set-ups • Telescope aperture > typical cell size • Resolution is capped by seeing disk size (ouch!) • Creates larger seeing disk, especially with longer exposures

  11. Cornell University lecture notes

  12. Here’s the Kicker • R0 is usually in the range of only 10 – 20cm in the visual range • May be as high as 40cm in very best locations • Gets larger with longer wavelengths – (e.g. 10cm to 20cm, violet to red)

  13. Measuring Seeing • Common amateur measure is FWHM of a non-saturated, well-formed star near zenith • Largely independent of focal length • Accuracy requires image scale of <= 1 asp • Exposure time > cell “coherence” time (10+ seconds • Actual seeing may be better than measured • Guiding, focus, collimation issues • Mechanical flaws, vibration, wind deflection

  14. Measuring Seeing • “Seeing monitors” typically take a different approach by measuring image motion • Measure position of a single star at 5 ms intervals (SBIG) • Use an aperture mask to measure differential displacements of 2-4 images of same star (DIMM) • In any case, they compute an equivalent FWHM value

  15. Now About Those Cells… • So, atmospheric cells of different temperature/density are bad news for seeing… • But where do they come from? • Can we use meteorology or atmospheric models to forecast seeing? • What can we do to mitigate the effects?

  16. Seeing and Atmospheric Models • There are four major regions (heights) that are involved • Upper (free atmosphere) ~ 6km – 12km • Central (boundary) ~ 100m – 2 km • Near-ground (surface boundary) ~ 0-100m • Local – telescope and immediate proximity

  17. Upper Layer (6-12 km) • Typically a function of the jet streams • Worst where mixing occurs at the margins of a jet stream • It’s the thermal mixing that kills you more than the actual wind speed • This layer typically contributes the least to the problem (maybe less than 0.5”)

  18. Central Layer (100m – 2 km) • Large-scale topography upwind of the site • Mountains, dense urban areas vs. flat terrain or large bodies of water • Strong convection zones vs. temperature inversions or even fog • Turbulent vs. laminar flows

  19. Near Ground Layer (0 – 100m) • Convection at or near the observing site – pads, paved surfaces, neighboring buildings, trees • Turbulent air flow created by adjacent structures, landforms, vegetation • Wind is not necessarily your enemy – but “thermal mixing” is

  20. Local Environment • Convection in observatory • Tube currents • Thermal layer at air/glass boundary • Heat sources inside telescope or observatory (including bodies)

  21. Improving The Situation • Keep the big picture in mind • Thermal equilibrium is good • Thermal mixing is bad • Elevate the observatory (you wish) • Avoid big sources of convection – blacktop, rooftops, trees

  22. Improving The Situation • Equilibrate outside and inside temperatures • Open the roof when temperatures are dropping • Keep sunlight out of the observatory • Use fans • Note that roll-off roofs have the advantage here • Consider using tube fans – boundary layer over mirror is a major source of tube currents

  23. Improving The Situation • Don’t set up immediately downwind of a structure • Eliminate or shield heat sources near the telescope • Keep your body out of the optical path, especially in cold weather

  24. Don’t Lose Your Perspective • You may never see “excellent” seeing • What’s ‘good’ for one person is ‘lousy’ for another, largely based on location • Anecdotal comments about seeing aren’t very reliable without a specific context • Don’t underestimate the importance of seeing in high-resolution work

  25. Good seeing conditions, world-class planetary imager

  26. Poor seeing conditions, same imager

  27. What About Forecasts • Forecasts using only jet stream maps not very useful – a minor contributor • CSC and MeteoBlue forecasts are helpful • “Near-ground” and “local” layer forecasts are up to you – and these are the most important

More Related