1 / 2

Behaviors Actions Decisions Controls team collaborative adaptive

BRAVE Framework. Behaviors Actions Decisions Controls team collaborative adaptive individual hierarchical sy stemic. Relationships Communication Debate Conflict informal surface welcomed formal in-depth avoided . Environment Layout Décor Dress

bluma
Download Presentation

Behaviors Actions Decisions Controls team collaborative adaptive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BRAVE Framework Behaviors ActionsDecisionsControls team collaborativeadaptive individual hierarchical systemic Relationships CommunicationDebateConflict informal surface welcomed formal in-depthavoided Environment LayoutDécorDress open casual casual walled formal formal Attitudes PurposeIdentity Power committed team diffused less buy-in individual controlled Values LearningRiskTime horizon collaborative open short-term directive protective long-term From The New Leader’s 100-Day Action Plan Bradt, Check, Pedraza, (Wiley, 2011)

  2. BRAVE Culture Assessment- Tool 5.2b From The New Leader’s 100-Day Action Plan, Bradt, Check, Pedraza, (Wiley, 2011) Behaviors ACTIONS: Observe whether people have a bias to act more on their own as individuals or as a team. DECISION MAKING: Observe whether bosses make decisions and tell subordinates what to do or tend towards more team-based collaborative co-creation and consultation. CONTROL POINTS: Observe whether the business is managed in writing systemically or more verbally and face-to-face. Other notable practices: Note any other notable practices that give you clues as to “The way things are done around here.” Relationships COMMUNICATION: The scale here goes from more formal to less formal modes and manners. INTELLECTUAL DEBATE: Look to the difference between surface-level, polite conversations and more in-depth probing, discussion, and debate. CONFLICT: Determine if people have a bias to avoid conflict because it is destructive or welcome it as a constructive way to move ideas forward. Observations RE: use of Credit and Blame, and so on Attitude Buy-in to Purpose: Dig into the level of commitment to the organization’s purpose. identity: Probe where people fall on the scale of identifying with themselves, their sub-group, their group/division or the organization as a whole— – one-team. power: An organization’s attitude to power is closely related to the way it makes decisions. Whether power is institutional, personal, or resource-based, figure out how tightly it is controlled or diffused. other observations: Note other hints about people’s attitudes. Values learning: Determine if people are directed around what and how to learn or whether learning tends to be more collaborative and shared. risk appetite: Determine if the organization cares more about protecting what it has or gaining what it doesn’t have, but could have risking more to gain more. time horizon: Determine whether the organization is more focused on shorter time- frames or longer time-frames. underlying beliefs: Get at the beliefs and assumptions underlying the organization’s choices. Environment office layout: Note the bias to more formal walled offices versus more casual open spaces. office décor: Note the formality of work spaces. how people dress: Note the formality versus casualness of the way people dress. other insights: Note other clues from the environment. Readiness for change: This is the main question. Organizations with more dimensions on the right are generally more ready to change than organizations with more dimensions falling to the left of these scales.

More Related