1 / 42

WasteMINZ 2007 – Hamilton CastleBin Multi Compartment Kerbside Collection

WasteMINZ 2007 – Hamilton CastleBin Multi Compartment Kerbside Collection. Andrew Slack – Project Manager (Contract) - Palmerston North City Council Glen Castle - Easy Workz Design Noel Burgess – IPSCO Ltd . Project Team. Andrew Slack – Project Manager – TBL Solutions

blue
Download Presentation

WasteMINZ 2007 – Hamilton CastleBin Multi Compartment Kerbside Collection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WasteMINZ 2007 – HamiltonCastleBinMulti Compartment Kerbside Collection Andrew Slack – Project Manager (Contract) - Palmerston North City CouncilGlen Castle - Easy Workz DesignNoel Burgess – IPSCO Ltd

  2. Project Team • Andrew Slack – Project Manager – TBL Solutions • Glen Castle – Castle Bin Design - Easy Workz • Noel Burgess – Castle Bin Collection – IPSCO Ltd

  3. Agenda • Waste Minimisation and Recycling Drivers in Palmerston North • Household Recycling Collection Trial • CastleBin Design Features • CastleBin Collection

  4. Part 1 Waste Minimisation and Recycling Collection Drivers in Palmerston North

  5. Waste Minimisation Drivers in Palmerston North • Closure of Awapuni Landfill on 31st January 2007 and significant long term increase in waste disposal costs • Replacement of City Enterprises (old technology) collection fleet • Current manual collection using shopping bags leads to staff injuries and significant litter issues. • Waste and recycling services are core services of the Council and a significant weekly interface between Council and household. • Opening of Awapuni Recycling Centre and Long Term Partnership with Fullcircle to increase recycling in general • Adoption of Waste Minimisation Plan in November 2005 by Council • Over 40% of waste deposited into Awapuni was paper and plastics which are key materials in existing recycling collection • Separation of glass in kerbside collection

  6. Waste Minimisation Plan - 2005 • The Palmerston North has a number of goals under its Waste Minimisation Plan 2005: • Strategy 1 –Maintain a comprehensive and effective rubbish collection and disposal service • Strategy 2 - Increase Recycling • Strategy 3 – Establish a Resource Recovery Facility with a community focus • Strategy 4 – Provide hazardous waste disposal facilities where possible • Strategy 5 – Provide environmental education • Strategy 6 – Adopt a disposer pays policy • Strategy 7 – Support a waste minimisation levy • Strategy 8 – Take a leadership in waste minimisation in the community

  7. “Going Greener” Goals • Establish recycling industrial park powered by renewable energy. • Increase domestic recycling rate from 30% to 50% by 2012 • Implement Waste Minimisation Plan

  8. Key Factors in Kerbside Recycling Collection There are a number of key factors in kerbside recycling collection: • Ease of use • Health and safety in collection • Collection volume, sort time and frequency • Cross contamination of material and source separation • Environmental factors – wind, rain, animal damage etc. • Household acceptance

  9. Recycling Trends in New Zealand There are a number of trends in recycling in New Zealand: • Move away from waste disposal to resource recovery • Move to wheelie bins for collection – Auckland, Christchurch, Timaru South Taranaki etc • Long term Council contracts and partnerships with businesses • Service levels and costs have increased. • Recycling is an area where a Council can make a positive contribution to general environmental awareness.

  10. Part 2 Recycling Collection Trial Andrew Slack – TBL Solutions(Contract to Palmerston North City Council)

  11. Objectives of Kerbside Recycling Trial Strategy 2 of the WMP has the overall objective of increasing recycling in Palmerston North. One of the main factors driving recycling collection volumes is household acceptance of the kerbside collection system. Consequently the Council has undertaken a series of household acceptance trials. The objective is to select the best overall system for Palmerston North looking at a 10 year life span.

  12. 3 Weeks 3 Weeks 3 Weeks 3 Weeks Group 1 RC CB WB Group 2 WB RC CB Group 3 CB WB RC Shopping Bags Structure of Recycling Trial The sample size was 350 households from a population of 27,500. This sample size is predicted to provide around a 5% margin of error. Each trial area was split into 3. Each trial was run for 12 weeks - 3 weeks on shopping bags (control period) and then 3 weeks on each of 3 new methods

  13. Trial Areas in Palmerston North The following areas were included in the recycling trial: • Waterloo Crescent – 120 households • Ashhurst – 70 households • Maxwells Line – 160 households • Total Sample Size = 350 Households • The last trial week ended 7th December 2006

  14. Recycling Collection Options – Glass Focus Glass Collection Options Single Stream Glass Collection Co-mingled Glass Collection Multi Compartment Bin Co-mingled Bin Split Bin Waste & Recycling Drop-off Bottle banks Separate Collection Kerbside Sorting GLASS IS DIFFERENT – IT DOES NOT LIKE COMPACTION OR EXCESSIVE HANDLING High Quality Glass – Mix, Compact and Break (30%) – Expensive Sorting – Low Quality Glass

  15. Multi Criteria Analysis • Recycling Collection • Multi-Criteria Analysis • Environmental Factors • Community Factors • Economic Factors • Environmental Factors • Recycling Volumes • Glass Recovery Rates • Pest and /Wind Control • Community Factors • Convenience and ease of handling • Litter Control • Health and Safety(Collection and Household) • Economic Factors • Overall capital investment • On-going operating costs • Relative Collection Cost • Relative Sorting/Processing Cost • Glass Cross Contamination • System Wear and Tear • MORE THAN LOWEST SHORT TERM CONTRACT COST • The Palmerston North City Council has used a multi-criteria analysis to determine that a separate glass collection using bottle banks and/or bins is the best long term solution for glass collection.

  16. Recycling Methods 4 kerbside recycling methods were trialed: • Shopping Bags (weekly) • 2 x Recycling Crates (weekly) • 240litre Standard Wheelie Bin • 240litre Castle (Multi Compartment) Wheelie Bin

  17. Shopping Bags – Current System • Current system • Nearly phased out in NZ • Weekly manual system with health and safety issues • City Enterprises trucks need significant re-investment • Not much scope to increase volumes • Time for change?

  18. Recycling Crates – Most Common in NZ • Most common system in New Zealand • Trend is to replace with commingled wheelie Bins • Weekly Collection • Volume is limited • Material is sorted on street with health and safety issues

  19. Wheelie Bin – Rising Trend in NZ • Most common system worldwide • Move to wheelie bin in NZ – Auckland, Christchurch, Timaru etc • High penetration already in Palmerston North ($200 plus per week) • Flexible and automated pick-up • Fortnightly • Leads to increased participation and volumes due to convenience • Has problem of cross (particularly glass) contamination

  20. Castle Bin – Prototype Invented in Palmerston North • Invented in Palmerston North by Glen Castle and PNCC recycling team • All advantages of standard wheelie bin system • Additional advantage of source separation and reduced post-processing costs

  21. Questionnaire Format • Current recycling behavior? • Current wheelie bin use? • Do the new methods increase recycling? • System preference- user-friendly- mobility- tidiness • Comments

  22. Trial ResultsHouseholds Strongly Prefer Wheelie Bins for Recycling • 90% households prefer either the Castle Bin or Standard Wheelie Bin for recycling

  23. Results – Household Questionnaire • 50% said a new system would increase their recycling • 10% of participants were completely new recyclers • 30% used a wheelie bin in some way and 12% had a green waste bin only

  24. Results – Household Questionnaire • There was very low support (2%) for the current shopping bag system and crate system (9%). • There was considerable enthusiasm for change • The householders wanted a tidy system protected from the environment • Households like convenience of wheelie bins • There were quite a few serious fans of the CastleBin

  25. Trial Results Recycling volumes from alternative recycling systems are increased • 60% (Waterloo Crescent) to 80% (Maxwells Line) increase in recycling weights

  26. Trial Results Relative sort time was 50% less for CastleBin

  27. Trial Results Residual waste was 50% less for the CastleBin

  28. Trial Results Recycling volumes from alternative recycling systems are increased • 60% (Waterloo Crescent) to 80% (Maxwells Line) increase in recycling weights

  29. Castle Bin – Preferred Method(by Households) “The multi-bin was very easy to use and the street looked so much tidier on collection day. I went from two rubbish bags each week down to one which I assume meant I was recycling more” “The multi-bin was more user friendly than the wheelie bin…” “…the multi bin would probably make life easier as items are already separated” “…Our family really liked the separate compartments of the multi bin. It’s a winner!!” “I consider the multi bin to be the most economical as sorting will have generally been done by each household…” “Multi bin was by far the best. Its easier for the recycling people as well” “Loved the multi bin”

  30. Shopping Bags New Recycling Collection System Dedicated Recyclers (30%) Possible Recyclers (40%) Unlikely and Never (30%) Castle Bin – Preferred Method(by Households) • The ease of use of MWB systems allows the recovery from the 40% possible recyclers to increase • Palmerston North has a goal to increase recycling to around 50% (compared to waste by weight) by 2012

  31. Part 3 CastleBin Multi Compartment Recycling Collection Glen Castle – Easy Workz

  32. CastleBin Summary • The CastleBin is a New Zealand invention. • It has an international patent for the bottom compartment. • Glass is collected in the bottom and kept in a separate non compacting compartment in the split truck. • The rest of the material is collected mixed and kept in a high compaction compartment in the split truck

  33. Large Cardboard Large Cardboard remains loose remains loose 6 Bags Paper 6 Bags Paper And Cardboard And Cardboard 24 Large Plastic 24 Large Plastic 12 Steel Cans 12 Steel Cans 12 Wine bottles 12 Wine bottles bottles (uncrushed) bottles (uncrushed) 12 Aluminium 12 Aluminium 24 Beer bottles 24 Beer bottles CastleBin – Large Fortnightly Capacity

  34. CastleBin Integrated System • Integrated Dual Compartment Bin and Truck and processing 170 Litres Paper Cardboard Plastics Metals 80% - 200 kg/m3 plus Compaction Paper Cardboard Plastics Metals 70 Litres Glass Only 20% Non Compacted – Glass Only

  35. Castle Bin Injection Moulding • It is feasible to injection mould the CastleBin • Probably made in China • It will have RSID

  36. Part 4 CastleBin Multi Compartment Recycling Collection Truck Noel Burgess – IPSCO Ltd

  37. CastleBin Collection Vehicle - IPSCO • Noel Burgess • Design brief • One man operation • Maximise collection logistics • Reduce Health & Safety risks • Dual compartment body • Automated lifter operation • Absolutely NO cross contamination of product

  38. CastleBin Collection Vehicle - IPSCO • One man operation • Dual control vehicle • In-cab controls • Maximise collection logistics • 4x2 vehicle configuration • Maximum body capacity • Efficient lifter cycle • Full pack compactor system • Full eject discharge system • Minimum tare weight

  39. CastleBin Collection vehicle - IPSCO • Dual compartment body • Split matches CastleBin • Glass on bottom with internal taildoor • Co-mingle material on top – includes volume of external taildoor • Full compact\ejector system in top compartment • Sweep function with full eject in bottom compartment • Lifter Operation • Multi axis Joystick control • Horizontal slide • Single cylinder vertical rotation • 150 degree rotation to invert CastleBin into body

  40. CastleBin Collection Vehicle - IPSCO • No Cross contamination • CastleBin remains vertical (upright) until the “top” of the cycle • No content spill • As the CastleBin is rotated, to discharge, a “Chute” is rotated out from the bottom compartment • Bottom compartment of the CastleBin has completely discharged before the top section starts (to discharge)

  41. CastleBin Collection Vehicle - IPSCO • Reduce Health & Safety risks • No kerbside sorting • Minimal handling of CastleBin by operator • Multi camera CCTV system allowing the operator views • Down RHS of vehicle (when operated from LHS) • Rear view • Operator exits onto verge not into traffic • Body does not “tip” to discharge • External “audible alarms” for lifter operation, taildoor operation, reversing

  42. For more information contact: Andrew Slack TBL Solutions Ph 021 267 1788 andrew.slack@tblsolutions.c.nz or andrew.slack@pncc.govt.nz

More Related