DOD Non- Standard Equipment Review Panel
Download
1 / 17

DOD Non- Standard Equipment Review Panel (NSERP) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 85 Views
  • Uploaded on

DOD Non- Standard Equipment Review Panel (NSERP). Briefing to the NCMA Chapter Meeting 17 February 2005. Michael T. Brown Dir, Business Development Advanced Technology Programs. http://www.acq.osd.mil/cp. Chemical and Biological Defense. Expanding Roles and Missions. Infrastructure.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' DOD Non- Standard Equipment Review Panel (NSERP)' - blue


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

DOD Non- Standard Equipment Review Panel(NSERP)

Briefing to the

NCMA Chapter Meeting

17 February 2005

Michael T. Brown

Dir, Business Development

Advanced Technology Programs

http://www.acq.osd.mil/cp


Chemical and biological defense
Chemical and Biological Defense

Expanding Roles and Missions

Infrastructure

Power Projection

Battle Space

“Threats”

“Classic” CBW

Bio-Engineered

And

“Non-Traditional”

Threats

Environmental

Threats- TICs/TIMs

Environmental/ Medical Surveillance

Infectious

Diseases

Capabilities Based, Not Threat Based


Why is cbrn defense different
Why is CBRN Defense Different

Post-Gulf War analysis demonstrated excessive duplication of effort among the Services in development and acquisition of NBC defense equipment, resulting in operational inefficiencies


Public Law 103-160(NDA Act for Fiscal Year 1994*)

  • “The Secretary of Defense shall . . . Assign responsibility for overall coordination and integration of the chemical and biological warfare defense program and the chemical and biological medical defense program to a single office within the Secretary of Defense. . . . Exercise oversight over the chemical and biological defense program through the Defense Acquisition Board process. . . .”

  • “The Secretary of Defense shall designate the Army as executive agent for the Department of Defense to coordinate and integrate research, development, test, and evaluation, and acquisition requirements of the military departments for chemical and biological warfare defense programs of the Department of Defense.”

*This section of PL 103-160 is now 50 USC 1522


Public Law 103-160(NDA Act for Fiscal Year 1994)

  • “The budget for the Department of Defense for each fiscal year after fiscal year 1994 shall reflect a coordinated and integrated chemical and biological defense program for the military departments.”

  • “Funding requests for the program shall be set forth in the budget . . . with a single program element for each of the categories of research, development, test, and evaluation, acquisition, and military construction . . . . Funding requests for the program may not be included in the budget accounts of the military departments.”


Jpm project guardian family of systems fos
JPM Project Guardian Family of Systems (FoS)

Installation

Protection

Decision Support

Bio Sampling Kit

DFU

ICAM

ACADA

Biological Detection

Chemical Detection

Information

Management and

Warning

M40

Large Air Filtration Unit

Escape Masks

Collective Protection

JSLIST

Individual Protection

Radiological

Detection

Medical Response

& Surveillance

Restoration

Patient

Decon Tent

M291 SDK

AN/PDR 77

Prophylaxis

M100 SDS

RAD Portal

Detection

ESSENCE

AN/UDR 14

JBAIDS (FY05)

The systems shown above are not all inclusive of systems that may be part of the Guardian IPP FoS.


Problem defined
Problem Defined

  • DOD elements are procuring capabilities to meet unique Homeland Defense mission

  • ATSD (NCB) memo dated 3 Feb 03 requires product performance validation prior to fielding/ use

  • Establish new framework- new mission area/ capabilities


Framework
Framework

  • Look at proven National Standards as baseline:

    • Any equipment in the Chem, Bio, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN) Defense area

    • Applies to all DOD- military and workers

  • DHS will set the standards…

  • NSERP is not a testing program- validation of performance to stated concept of operations/ operating environment


Flow chart of cbrn defense capabilities for hld
Flow Chart of CBRN Defense Capabilities for HLD

Joint Requirements Office

T&E

MUA

Combat

Procure and Field

YES

Warfighting ?

HLD CBRN Defense

Needed

HLD

Procure and Use

Standard Met

NO

YES

Standard Exists ?

DOD

NSERP

Process

NO


Nserp process
NSERP Process

Panel

Audit

Industry

More Info/ Data

DOD/ Mil

JPEO Decision

Analysis

Requirement

Panel

Review

Joint Staff

Panel

Recommendation


Nserp participants
NSERP Participants

  • Panel

    • JPEO CBRN Defense

    • JSTO- DTRA

    • JRO

    • OSD

  • JSTO Related Actions

    • Review previous purchases

    • Independent test data exists

    • Test/ validate previous purchases

Cytokine cascade


Military service responsibility
Military Service Responsibility

  • Define needs/ CONOPS and Operational Environment

  • Submit Request containing:

    • Need/ CONOPS/ Environment

    • Performance (Standard required)

    • Safety of Use data

    • Test methods

    • Tech and operational test data

      • Independent testing…paid by user

    • Plan for Training, sustainment and logistics (DOTMLPF)


Industry responsibility
Industry Responsibility

  • Support Military Selection of Capabilities

  • Provide Technical data and test results

    • Who tested

    • Test set up- data set valid

  • Assist in submittal package

  • Provide additional info as needed


Nser panel responsibilities
NSER Panel Responsibilities

  • Do Tech review of proposal for user

  • Provide Service feedback

  • Provide assistance as requested- clarification

  • Recommend to JPEO for approval/ disapproval

  • Publish panel results

    • Equipment database established

    • Adjudication of request within 30 days


Military service benefits
Military Service Benefits

  • Safe, effective and suitable capabilities- logistically sustainable and affordable

  • Beginning of centralized data base of approved capabilities

  • Focused process to procure Non-Standard Equipment for HLD

  • Synergy to support Department of Homeland Security to adopt National Standards


Joint program executive officer decision
Joint Program Executive OfficerDecision

  • Addresses Specific buy- stated purpose and CONOPS

  • Does not change normal Military procurement requirements or processes

  • Does not authorize sole source procurement



ad