1 / 34

MDI towards technical design

MDI towards technical design. Lau Gatignon. Very preliminary ! To trigger discussions. MACHINE DETECTOR INTERFACE. Plus others ………. IP Feedback. Beamcal + Lumical. Anti-solenoid. Vacuum. QD0 quadrupoles. Support tubes. +Stabilization + prealignment. CONTENTS. Introduction

blenda
Download Presentation

MDI towards technical design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MDI towards technical design Lau Gatignon

  2. Very preliminary ! To trigger discussions

  3. MACHINE DETECTOR INTERFACE Plus others ……….. IP Feedback Beamcal+ Lumical Anti-solenoid Vacuum QD0 quadrupoles Support tubes +Stabilization + prealignment

  4. CONTENTS • Introduction • QD0 Magnet • Stabilization • QD0 support & pre-isolation • Pre-alignment • IP-Feedback • Anti-solenoid • Instrumentation • Vacuum • Overall integration • Safety • Backgrounds • Other issues

  5. R.Stapnes @ ACE meeting 2 February 2011

  6. MDI MEMBERS R.Appleby, A.Apyan, B.Bartalesi, M.Battaglia, E.Bravin, H.Burkhardt, P.N.Burrows, F.Butin, B.Dalena, K.Elsener, A.Gaddi, M.Gastal, L.Gatignon, H.Gerwig, C.Grefe, E.Gschwendtner, M.Guinchard, A.Hervé, A.Jérémie, Th.Lefèvre, L.Linssen, H.Mainaud-Durand, S.Mallows, M.Modena, J.Osborne, Th.Otto, C.Perry, F.Ramos, J.Resta Lopez, A.Sailer, H.Schmickler, D.Schulte, N.Siegrist, J.Snuverink, E.Solodko, R.TomasGarcia, D.Tommasini, R.Veness, J.Vollaire, A.Vorozhtsov, V.Ziemann, F.Zimmermann

  7. QD0 Magnet M.Modena, A.Vorozhtsov, A.Bartalesi, E.Solodkoet al

  8. QD0 Magnet • Construct and test short prototypeGradient, field quality, vibration modes, radiation hardness, impact of external fields • Finalize design, construct and test full length models of QD0 and QF1Gradient, field quality, stability • Design and build field measurement device for long and small apertures with required precision • Tests some prototype in beam line (ATF2, CERN-NA or other)In collaboration with stabilization team

  9. SS QD0 Stabilisation A.Jeremie et al (LAPP/Annecy)

  10. Stabilization • Finalize choice of sensors (relative and absolute) and actuators • Analyze vibrational modes of final QD0 magnet and optimize stabilization strategy accordingly • Design and validate design of stabilization foot • Finalize integration in support tube • Simulation and test in realistic environment of stabilization performance • Cooperation with other luminosity stabilization systemsincluding data communication with other systems • Stabilisation for L* = 6 m solution

  11. QD0 Support and Pre-isolator A.Gaddi, H.Gerwig, F.Ramos et al

  12. QD0 support and pre-isolation • Finalize analysis and tests with pre-isolator prototype • Based on these results, finalize design of full-scale pre-isolator • Finalize design of QD0 support tubes, taking into account constraints from integration • Construct and test one pre-isolator + support tube assembly and validate performance • Combined test with stabilized QD0

  13. P Pre-alignment (including QD0) H.Mainaud-Durand et al

  14. Pre-alignment • Execute agreed work packages with NIKHEFComplete/update CDR chapter accordingly • Test and validate rigidity of CAM mover system and demonstrate compatibility with stabilization requirements • As a result make full simulation of RASNIK system with realistic light transport channels through detector • Validate stretched wire approach for 500 m length • Full design of stretched wire system, compatible with integration and push-pull constraints.

  15. IP-Feedback Ph.Burrows, J.RestaLopez et al

  16. IP Feedback • Continue tests and design to optimize latency • Optimize feedback algorithms One or two sides, sensitivity to background (using detector MC) • Continue full simulations, including other feedback and feed-forward systems and isolation + stabilization • Studies of radiation hardness and B-field tolerance • Final engineering, taking into account integration constraints • Solution for L*= 6 m implementation of QD0

  17. Anti-solenoid B.Dalena, A.Bartalesi, A.Sailer, A.Gaddi, H.Gerwig et al

  18. Anti-solenoid • Complete a realistic designConfirm choice of super-conducting technologyGood main solenoid compensation Take into account effect of permendur on field configuration Minimize deformation of main solenoid field • Integration with detector layout and QD0 support • Validate that luminosity performance is adequate • Coupling of anti-solenoid and main solenoid Protection of QD0 (permendur, permanent magnets)

  19. Instrumentation • In collaboration with other working groups, arrive at final design and integration of beam instrumentation relevant for the IP • This includes the instrumentation for the IP feedback, but also luminosity monitoring in the post-collision line • Follow-up of discussions related to polarization

  20. Vacuum in IR region R.Veness et al

  21. Vacuum • Final design of all vacuum systems involved, including specification of all vacuum tubes/tanks, valves and pumps • Calculation of static and dynamic vacuum pressures in BDS, IR and post-collision lines • Validate that the impact on beam dynamics and luminosity is acceptable

  22. Integration H.Gerwig and many others

  23. Integration • Work out in more detail the L*=6 m backup solution andcompare with L*=3.5 m (luminosity, acceptance, stabilisation, etc) • Follow-up evolution of detector designsFor both detectors or eventual new detector designs In particular impact of changes close to beam • Together with BDS teams, finalize choice of L*Can one agree on a single L*, which one? If needed, is it possible to have two different L* ?Work out solution with QD0 in the tunnel, first conceptually (1 year?), at a later stage also technically.Compare with L* = 3.5 m. • Design and construction of push-pull platforms • Optimize time for push-pull operation • Detailed integration with civil engineering and services

  24. Safety • Agree with safety and civil engineering on all general safety aspects in the surface and underground areasFire safety, smoke extraction, ventilation, RP,escape routes, etcetera • Finalize RP simulations with final BDS and detector layoutsAre detectors self-shielding enough? Shielding cavern-garage, ... RP implications (if any) of muon backgrounds from BDS Evaluation of all accident scenarios. Requirements for MPS • Design shielding accordinglyEvaluate whether big shielding doors are necessary. Thickness? • Cryogenic safety issues

  25. Backgrounds • Collaborate with BDS, Post-collision line and LCD to evaluate and minimize backgrounds from machine, dumps and IP • Evaluate, together with BDS, the impact of muons and their cleaning on the IR in terms of RP safety and backgrounds • Confirm that Beamcal ad Lumical are sufficient to serve as masks against neutrons from the various dumps • Finalize integration of post-collision line in IR

  26. And everything else …….

  27. Other issues • Continue to coordinate between different working groupsMagnets, stabilization, post-collision line + dumps, BDS, LCD, CES • Establish link between detectors and CES group for specification of all services and their integration • Work towards full and more precise cost estimate • Provide relevant chapters in Project Preparation Plan • Prepare first version of Safety File

  28. Spare slides

  29. Stabilization (2) In particular (Annecy groups): • Collaboration model • Continue characterization of vibration environment (correlations) • Continued sensor studies, in particular capacitive gauges and chemical sensors • Continued actuator studies and control loop optimization • Calculations on vibration modes of QD0 and support structures and combine those with pre-isolator and feedback loops in overall simulations • Contribute to integration with other IR equipment, supports, controls, etc (CERN responsibility) • Tolerance studies with respect to external magnetic fields and radiation • Construction of full prototype with test in real life (ATF2 or lab?) • Liaison with MDI and stabilization working groups. Documentation

More Related