Skip this Video
Download Presentation
BC CASE April 2011

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

BC CASE April 2011 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

BC CASE April 2011. Ministry Update. Special needs funding Updates to Manual Demographic trends Evergreen Certificate High Incidence File Review Effective Practices Report – Students with Learning Disabilities Early Learning and FDK. Special Education Funding.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' BC CASE April 2011' - bing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
ministry update
Ministry Update
  • Special needs funding
  • Updates to Manual
  • Demographic trends
  • Evergreen Certificate
  • High Incidence File Review
  • Effective Practices Report – Students with Learning Disabilities
  • Early Learning and FDK

Special Education Funding

  • Unique student funding for special needs
    • Level 1 – $32,000 to $36,600
    • Level 2 – $16,000 to $18,300
    • Level 3 – $8,000 to $9,200
    • Total unique student funding to boards in 2010/11 for 24,260 unique students (23,905 funded FTEs)
    • Increase of approximately $11 million

Updates to Manual

  • Updates to Manual
  • No changes to categories or guidelines
  • Language changed in several places to reflect current approach to letter grades and percentages for students with special needs
  • Definition of speech-language pathology now matches the Health Professions Act, Health Section (94/2010)
  • Appendices have been revised/brought into currency

Demographic Trends – Prov. Inc. Rates– 2010/11

Dependent/Deafblind 0.12%

Mod to Profound Intellectual 0.35%

Phys Dis/Chronic Health Imp 1.22%

Visual Impairment 0.06%

Deaf/Hard of Hearing 0.21%

Autism Spectrum Disorder 0.95%

IntenBeh Inter /Ser Mental Illness 1.28%

Learning Disability 3.15%

Mild Intellectual Disability 0.39%

Mod Beh Support/Mental Illness 1.08%

Gifted 1.27%

All categories 10.07%

ministry update evergreen certificate
Ministry Update – Evergreen Certificate
  • In 2009/10, 1,065 BC School Completion (Evergreen) Certificates were issued to students who had successfully met the goals of their educational program other than graduation.
what s coming
What’s Coming
  • Adjudication
  • Use of technology important for independence
  • Should begin early and be supported by IEP goals and strategies
  • Success should be monitored and assessed.
  • Decision not to use technology should be made only after significant effort and support
  • Made by educators in consultation with other support team members.
  • Information will be posted in the in the Handbook of Procedures for 2011-12, on the adjudications website and on the Just-in-CASE wiki.
ministry update what s coming
Ministry Update – What’s Coming
  • Modules on using software for exams
  • Revised ESL standards
  • Modernized safe schools web pages
  • Guidelines for transitions from youth justice programs back into schools
concerns we hear
Concerns we hear
  • Referring to “adapted” or “modified” students

Our response... these terms are strategies, not students

    • Adaptations are a form of accommodation, and modifications are applied to learning outcomes, not to students
    • CASE can be leaders in terminology use
  • Assertions that students with special needs indentified in high incidence categories are “unfunded”

Our response... Boards asked for a simpler funding formula with more autonomy – hence mixed funding model

    • These students ARE a priority
    • Levels of support should be based on student needs, not categories

Personalized Learning

  • Imagine an education system…….
      • Recognizes and responds to the uniqueness of every single learner
      • Flexibility in where, when, and how learning takes place
      • Parents are effectively engaged in their child’s learning
      • Teachers are facilitators of learning
      • Supported by technology
personalized learning
Personalized Learning
  • What the Ministry will be focusing on in the coming year re: personalized learning and special needs:
  • What does personalized learning mean in terms of fostering effective instructional practices for students with special needs?
  • What does this mean in terms of curriculum, large scale and classroom assessments, performance standards and reporting?

Personalized learning

  • Regarding students with special needs, things to consider...
      • What parts of their educational program need to be personalized to their learning needs?
      • In personalizing for all, what would the benefits be for students with special needs?
      • In personalizing for all, what challenges do you see, and how can they be best managed?
      • How should a personalized learning plan relate to an IEP?

Other questions for us?