1 / 15

CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. A legal , moral, or social entitlement due to all people because they are human beings. The ability to conduct one’s affairs without being hampered or frustrated. QUOTES Freedom is anarchy.

bina
Download Presentation

CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CH 4CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS A legal , moral, or social entitlement due to all people because they are human beings. The ability to conduct one’s affairs without being hampered or frustrated. QUOTES Freedom is anarchy. Rights are freedoms expressed with responsibility Rights are something you are entitled to. Freedom is being able to express your entitlements

  2. PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTSHUMAN RIGHTS – Rights that are considered basic to life in any human society.This concept can vary from society to society. Residential Schools THE GLOBAL MOVEMENT Human rights became a global issue after WW II UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS • backed by the UN after • “all human beings are born free & equal in dignity & rights”. • Most countries have agreed to these principles. • Problem – the only power the UN has is ‘world attention.’ • Not part of binding international law. Stalin’s Purges World Abuses 1870-1996Canada’s Indian Act & Residential Schools 1900-69 Australia ‘Stolen Generation’ 1924-53 Stalin 1939-45 Holocaust 1948-94 Apartheid 1959-? Chinese occupied Tibet 1971-79 Dictatorship in Uganda 1989 Tiananmen Square China 1991-99 Civil War Sierra Leone 1992-95 Bosnian War 1994 Rwandan Genocide 2004 Darfur genocide Apartheid Protest in China INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS 1946 International Court of Justice (Both parties had to agree) 2002 a more permanent International Criminal Court established. USA, China & others opposed (internal courts sufficient) Rwandan Genocide

  3. HUMAN RIGHTS IN CANADA Diefenbaker THE SUPREME COURT & THE RULE OF lAW • CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS – 1960 • Formally recognized Can. Rights held by common law. • Problem – ‘No teeth’ -> Could be changed like any other law. • Did not override Fed. Or Prov. laws. • CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS & FREEDOM • ‘The Bill of Rights with teeth’ -> Trudeau included in Constitution. • Limiting The Charter – • Reasonable Limits (Keegstra’s teachings on Holocaust) • Notwithstanding Clause – Fed. & Prov. Leg. have final say (Bill 101) • THE CHARTER IN ACTION • Fundamental Freedoms • Conscience, religion, thought, belief, opinion, expression, assembly, & association. • Mobility Rights (Free movement) • No extradition for death penalties, Effects of 9-11. • Equality Rights • Race, origin, colour, religion, sex, age, disability. • Exceptions – Affirmative action – protects minority rights & disadvantaged. • Legal Rights • Arrest procedures, questioning, search & seizure. James Keegstra Alberta teacher who taught hatred (Holocaust) Trudeau Gurbaj Singh Kirpan in school issue Delwin Vriend School teacher fired for being gay by a religious private, school in Alberta Do airport scanners violate your rights? Other Issues Concert goers Abortion Public cameras Pregnacy Radar cameras Gay Marriage , TRUANT’S GOLDEN RULE – “Life, Liberty, & Security”

  4. LIMITATIONS TORIGHTS & FREEDOMS NOTWITHSTANDING CLAUSE Provinces wanted an assurance to protect local issues. Quebec - Bill 101 / 178 French only signs / language 1928-72 Alberta Sterilization Program Klein tried used clause to protect provinces from civil suit based on previous gov’t. FAILED!!!!! REASONABLE LIMITS CLAUSE “Charter must be reasonable” The Oakes Test - Oakes had 8 vials of hash & $600. - Charged with trafficking; Onus was on him to prove innocence. - Supreme said small amounts is unreasonable for reverse onus. Violates “Presumption of Innocence” “Life, Liberty, Security.” Oakes possessed 8 vials of hash oil & $600 cash. Trafficking??? Personal Use??? Innocence???

  5. JURISDICTION & ENFORCEMENT • JURISDICTION • Applies to all gov’t organizations • Ie. Gov’t Branches, corporations, banks. • Private individuals will look to Fed. & Prov. Human Rights Codes • Ie Discrimination renting or hiring • ENFORCEMENT • People can challenge gov’t positions through the Supreme Court • Charter is written in general terms so judges can interpret individual cases. • Questions to be asked by Supreme Courts: • Is the right covered by Charter? • Were these rights infringed upon by gov’t? • Is the violation within reasonable limits? EXAMPLE – Polygamy – Bountiful 1. Freedom of Religion 2. Arresting practicing members 3. Under-aged (forced???) marriages Video - Bountiful

  6. CANADA’S HISTORICAL BLACK EYES Banning Potlatch Illegal to hire lawyers 1960 = Right to vote Residential Schools Chinese Head Tax 1900s Komogata Maru 1914 Slavery banned in 1833 Alberta Sexual Sterilization Act Psychiatric Hospital Patients 1929 WW II War Measures Act Enemy Aliens (Deported, No land) Internment Camps Jews = No Land Women not Considered “Persons” 1928 Women = Vote 1918

More Related