1 / 19

PROGRAM OF SWEDISH-RUSSIAN SEMINAR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION: ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT

PROGRAM OF SWEDISH-RUSSIAN SEMINAR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION: ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT. Evaluation and assessment in preschool – a perspective on pedagogical quality Workshop 2014 Professor Sonja Sheridan & Ph.D. Karin Lager, University of Gothenburg Sonja.sheridan@ped.gu.se

billie
Download Presentation

PROGRAM OF SWEDISH-RUSSIAN SEMINAR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION: ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PROGRAM OF SWEDISH-RUSSIAN SEMINAR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION: ZONE OF PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT Evaluation and assessment in preschool – a perspective on pedagogical qualityWorkshop 2014 Professor Sonja Sheridan & Ph.D. Karin Lager, University of Gothenburg Sonja.sheridan@ped.gu.se Moscow, 27-29 May, 2014

  2. Pedagogical qualityAn inter-subjective perspective of quality • Inter-subjectively agreed values and knowledge. • Research & Curricula • Cultural sensitive. • Dimensions that are constituted of both sustainable and dynamic/relative qualities that are inter-subjectively agreed on and subjectively conceived depending on perspective, time and context. • Constituted of four dimensions of quality

  3. Dimensions of pedagogical quality Dimension of the teachers Dimension of the society Dimension of the learning contexts Dimension of children

  4. Dimensions as tools and analytical lenses Dimension of the society Curriculum goals – children’s participation & influence Dimension of the teachers How teachers understand and make children part in on-going activities Dimension of children Children’s voices & real influence on preschool activities Dimension of the learning context Conditions creating for children’s participation & influence

  5. Quality – the arena of society, municipality and preschool Din text S Society • Society: • The National Agency for Education and the National Agency for School-inspection are responsible on a national level • Policy, curriculum guidelines for evaluation & Documentation • No methods recommended • Municipality: • Municipalities are responsible on a local level • Multiple methods - ECERS • Preschool: • Evaluate the preschool quality • Follow up, document & analyze children’s learning processes • Multiple methods – ECERS – pedagogical documentation Municipality Preschool

  6. A revision of the preschool curriculum Raising the ambition of preschool with a strengthened pedagogical task The goals and content related to literacy, mathematics, science and technology are strengthened A new area are introduced – documentation and evaluation Preschool teachers – responsible for pedagogical issues Responsibility of the preschool head National preschool curriculum with clear and integrated content goals for learning, play & care

  7. The preschool curriculum • The quality of the preschool shall be regularly and systematically documented, followed up, evaluated and developed. • Evaluating the quality of the preschool and creating good conditions for learning requires that the child’s learning and development be monitored, documented and analysed. • The aim of evaluation is to obtain knowledge of how the quality of the preschool i.e. its organisation, content and actions can be developed so that each child receives the best possible conditions for learning and development.

  8. Systematic quality work • Perspective on quality • Children’s knowledge & learning • Curriculum goals • Planning & implementation • Documentation, perspectives and definition • Evaluation of the preschool quality • Analyses and interpretation • Results and outcomes • Quality enhancement

  9. TheEarly Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS)Thelma Harms & Richard Clifford in 1980, ECERSThelma Harms & Richard Clifford & Debby Cryer in 1998, ECERS-r Kathy Sylva, IramSiraj-Blatchford & Brenda Taggart in 2004, ECERS-e • 37/43 items which define different levels of quality in typical situations of ECE • Seven subscales • Item scores ranging from 1 (inadequate) through to 7 (excellent). • The lower levels of quality are characterized by pedagogical unawareness and a focus on rules, and material resources, • Excellent level is characterized by teachers’ interaction with children and the best possible use of all resources, including them­selves, to promote children’s learning, participation, and influence.

  10. Its design to detect curricular & environmental quality Its comparative function of preschool quality from a national as well as international perspective Its focus on a child perspective – child’s experience Focus of evaluation is on preschool as a learning environment – not on individual teachers and children External and self-evaluations can be combined and compared Highlights teachers approaches and competence A starting point for a competence development program Why ECERS?

  11. Variation in preschool quality

  12. ECERS and subscale means

  13. A model for competence development in preschool Teacher Team Researcher Headmaster Lectures & Literature studies A Learning Organization Guidance Action research Planning Acting Observing Reflecting Development area in preschool

  14. Results of the competence development program • 20 preschools, the same financial conditions and staff-child ratio • The intervention group (9 preschools) enhanced the quality from an average of 4.50 to 4.98. The control group had a lower quality in the second evaluation, from an average of 4.49 to 4.18. • The differences between the two groups can be explained by the massive and directed development input, which throughout the development work continuously changed and evolved through the influence of the teachers themselves: • The structure of the Model of Competence Development and a focus on teachers competence • The researcher and the co-worker at the university were involved in the development process • The whole working team participated • Competence development program lasted over one year

  15. A childperspective and a child’s perspective

  16. The child’s learning and outcomes • Observation • Tests • Rating scales • Check lists • Documentation • Narrative approach • In Sweden: aims to gain knowledge of each child’s learning process in relation to specific goals/contents in order to enhance conditions for children’s learning.

  17. To discern, observe and evaluate quality in preschool • Implementation and understanding of curriculum goals • Preschool structure – the structure of the day • The physical room inside and outside • Materials and how they are used by teacher and child • Teachers’ learning orientation and competence (general competence, pedagogical competence, content knowledge, didactical knowledge). • Children’s experiences – what children express and how they act • Goals integrated in preschool activities and content • Communication and interaction • The emotional climate

More Related