1 / 17

SysML Modelica Integration Working Group Meeting (SE DSIG Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 9/17/2009)

Agenda for the SysML-Modelica Integration Working Group Meeting in San Antonio, TX on 9/17/2009, including introductions, recap of current status, feedback on RFC approach, review of remaining issues in transformation specification, and responsibilities and timeline.

bierman
Download Presentation

SysML Modelica Integration Working Group Meeting (SE DSIG Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 9/17/2009)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SysML Modelica IntegrationWorking Group Meeting(SE DSIG Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 9/17/2009) Chris Paredis Georgia Tech

  2. Agenda • 8:30: Introductions • 8:45: Recap of current status • 9:00: meeting Andrew Watson • Feedback on RFC approach • 10:00: Break • 10:30: Review of remaining issues in transformation specification • 11:30: Responsibilities and timeline

  3. Remaining Issues: Current Phase • Substantive: • When to use profile? When to use parametrics? • «modelicaType» • Express constraints on stereotypes more formally (preferably in OCL) • Inheritance and redeclaration of packages; packages contained in models • Part III: Modelica meta-model • Part IV: Correspondence

  4. Remaining Issues: Current Phase • Editorial: • Fill in gaps in Part I • Replace figures with jpg and fix capitalization on stereotypes • Reformat information in Part II to updated structure

  5. Remaining Issues: Longterm • Arrays • Local Type Modifications

  6. Backup slides for meeting with Andrew Watson

  7. Modelica: Dynamic Systems Modeling motor torque

  8. Simple Example ModelicaModel SysML Descriptive Model SysML Analytical Model

  9. SysML4Modelica Formal mapping Modelica

  10. Roadmap – Past (1)

  11. Roadmap – Past (2)

  12. Roadmap – Current Status

  13. Options for Future: SysML – Modelica Transformation Specification • Request for Comments (RFC) • Request for Proposals (RFP) • SysML v2.0 • Fold SysML-Modelica profile into SysML language • Not standardize Working Group has decided to explore the RFC option further

  14. Request for Comments (RFC): Definition • Any Contributing, Domain or Platform Member with technology that: • is relevant to a current Task Force adoption plan; • conforms to all applicable OMG Specifications; and • is available in a commercially-available implementation may make an unsolicited Submission to the TFC of the relevant Task Force for presentation to that TF for consideration through a Request for Comments. (Section 4.3, OMG Policies and Procedures, v2.8)

  15. Request for Comments (RFC): Process • Submit to the TFC of the relevant Task Force an unsolicited proposal for adoption through RFC • The Task Force which received the proposal may recommend its issuance by its parent TC as an RFC. • The TC obtains AB approval and may then, by majority vote, cause OMG to issue the Submission as an RFC. • The comment period opens. Any party (including non-members) may send comments. Typically lasts 60 days. • TF considers comments and decides, by majority vote, whether to recommend the Submission to its parent TC for adoption • If the TF recommends adoption, the parent TC shall obtain AB approval before making a final decision on whether to recommend the Submission for adoption by the Board of Directors, using an electronic poll needing a 2/3 majority to pass

  16. Request for Comments (RFC): Process • Possible Timeline • Finalize Transformation Specification(December 2009) • Reference Implementation (January 2010) • Submit RFC proposal (March 2010 meeting) • AB approval (March or June 2010 meeting) • Comment period (Summer 2010) • TF approval (September 2010 meeting) • Submission for adoption (December 2010 meeting)

  17. Request for Comments (RFC): Summary • Seems appropriate for this non-controversial specification • Requires vendor implementation and active user community • SysML and Modelica communities are very active • Initial discussions with tool vendors: • NoMagic, InterCAx, Sparx? • OpenModelica, Dynasim (DassaultSystemes) • Is faster than the other options • Would be the (first?) formal definition of an MDA transformation specification

More Related