1 / 19

Performance Analysis of Voice Transfer Using Multi-Transceiver Optical Communication Structures

Performance Analysis of Voice Transfer Using Multi-Transceiver Optical Communication Structures. Abdullah Sevincer , Hasan T. Karaoglu , and Murat Yuksel asev@cse.unr.edu, karaoglu@cse.unr.edu, yuksem@cse.unr.edu Project Website: http://www.cse.unr.edu/~yuksem/fso-manet.htm

beyla
Download Presentation

Performance Analysis of Voice Transfer Using Multi-Transceiver Optical Communication Structures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performance Analysis of Voice Transfer Using Multi-Transceiver OpticalCommunication Structures Abdullah Sevincer, Hasan T. Karaoglu, and Murat Yuksel asev@cse.unr.edu, karaoglu@cse.unr.edu, yuksem@cse.unr.edu Project Website: http://www.cse.unr.edu/~yuksem/fso-manet.htm IEEE ICSOS 2011, Santa Monica, CA

  2. Outline • Motivation • Literature Survey • Previous work & LOS Algorithm • Prototype Implementation • Experiments & Results • Conclusion & Future Work

  3. Motivation • RF spectrum is highly saturated – need alternative mediums for MANETs • Free-Space-Optical communication may serve as an alternative complementary medium to RF • Spectrum characteristics • 100+ GHz bandwidth • Low power per bit • License free • Directional communication • Spatial reuse • Low probability of intercept • Full-duplex transceivers • Device characteristics • Smaller form factor – dense packaging is possible • More durable • Issues to be solved (among others): • LOS – availability, and detection when available • Mobility or sway – LOS maintenance

  4. Free-Space-Optical Ad Hoc Networks Motivation: FSO-MANETs Free-Space-Optical (FSO) Communications Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking • High bandwidth • Low power • Dense spatial reuse • License-free band of • operation • Mobile communication • Auto-configuration • Spatial reuse and angular diversity in nodes • Low power and secure • Electronic auto-alignment • Optical auto-configuration (switching, routing) Project Website: http://www.cse.unr.edu/~yuksem/fso-manet.htm

  5. Motivation: FSO-MANETs • Our approach and focus to achieve the vision of FSO-MANETs • Low altitude and shorter ranges • LOS becomes the major issue not the visibility • Obstacles are common than the visibility problems • Cheaper devices (LEDs) with redundancy • Packaging and managing many transceivers per node • Electronic steering becomes possible if packaging provides angular diversity • No need for mechanical steering

  6. Motivation • Electronic steering over multi-transceiver FSO nodes • By using multiple transceivers per node and automatically detecting neighbor nodes that are in LOS each other, we showed how to maintain the LOS alignment on FSO nodes. [IEEE ICC’10] • Question: “Can we use such multi-transceiver structures for streaming-style applications which may require little or no disconnection?” 3-D optical antenna design.

  7. FSO Literature • High altitudes and longer ranges • FSO communications with a focus on coding and modulation techniques • Attaining longer transmission ranges, hardware design issues, and solutions against mobility • Focus on long distance (up to 7 kms) point-to-point applications with employing high-speed laser or VCSEL hardware. • Our focus: Low altitudes and shorter ranges

  8. FSO Literature • Multiple elements/transceivers in FSO communication in interconnects which communicate over very short distances. • The main issues: • interference (or cross-talk) between adjacent transceivers due to finite divergence of the light beam • Misalignment due to vibration.

  9. FSO Literature • FSO transmitters are highly directional: • comes with a cost of LOS alignment problem • Requires smart mechanisms to manage LOS among transceivers during an ongoing transmission. • Mechanical systems: (High maintenance and expensive, not fast enough to recover disruptions, multi-point-to-multi-point communication are not considered). • Our focus: Electronic steering with a redundancy of transceiver devices

  10. Previous Work & LOS Detection Algorithm • Instead of mechanical steering, we implemented “electronic steering” over spherical optical antennas. • LOS detection and alignment establishment protocol via fast handshakes among transceivers of neighboring nodes. • Quick and automatic hand-off of data flows among different transceivers • Omni-directional propagation and spatial reuse at the same time • Assigning logical data streams to appropriate physical transceivers/channels

  11. Prototype Implementation • Improved prototype with faster transceivers • Voice file transfers to evaluate performance of our LOS detection and alignment establishment protocol over streaming-style application traffic. • Mean Opinion Score (MOS) to evaluate voice transfer.

  12. Prototype-Hardware • Controller Board: • PIC32 Ethernet Starter Kit • Expansion board • FSO Transceivers

  13. Prototype-Setup NODE-B NODE-A TR1-A TR-B Wireless Link NODE-C TR-C TR2-A Wireless Link

  14. Prototype-Experiments • Transceiver Performance Test: • Half Duplex Line • Portable Document File (PDF): 3637 bytes • File Transfer at varying distances NODE-B NODE-A TR-B Wireless Link

  15. Prototype-Setup-Experiments NODE-B NODE-A TR1-A TR-B Wireless Link NODE-C TR-C TR2-A Wireless Link

  16. Prototype-Experiments • Simultaneous File Transfer • Image Transfer from Node-A to both Node-B and Node-C • Half Duplex and Full Duplex Line • Image File Length: 7572 bytes • Voice File Transfer • 6 different voice file transfer for MOS evaluation • Voice File Transfer at varying distances

  17. Results Image File Transfer Transceiver Performance Test Half Duplex Full Duplex MOS Performance: 6 Files MOS Performance: varying distance Unacceptable Quality Good MOS Values!

  18. Conclusion & Future Work • Prototype: FSO system: multiple data streams • Simultaneous voice file transfers with minimal disruptions and overheads • Multimedia service with off-the-shelf components: Multi-transceiver & directionality • Future Work: • Improvement on the quality of voice transfer • Improve the prototype: faster transceivers • Link-and physical layer buffering mechanisms: reduce misalignment effects

  19. Questions? Acknowledgments This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under awards 0721452 and 0721612 and DARPA under contract W31P4Q-08-C-0080

More Related