170 likes | 175 Views
Valorisation of household labour through relationships property law. Prof. Leon Verstappen. Introduction. Ideal world? Tasks and roles in family. Introduction. Autonomy and solidarity Just default system Advice Commission on European Family Law: participation in acquisitions
E N D
Valorisation of household labour through relationships property law • Prof. Leon Verstappen
Introduction • Ideal world? • Tasks and roles in family
Introduction • Autonomy and solidarity • Just default system • Advice Commission on European Family Law: • participation in acquisitions • community of acquisitions • Deviation from the default system • ‘Cold exclusion’
Introduction • 4 questions: • Why should there be compensation for household labour? What is the justification? • When should there be compensation for household labour? • How should that compensation look like? • How can couples, judges and the legislator use property law to compensate for household labour?
Research project ‘Cold exclusion’ • Modernisation of matrimonial property law • Research: On the nature and the dimension of financial problems and unfair situations that can occur upon dissolving formal and informal relations, especially when there is a considerable difference between the estates of the spouses.
Two problematic groups • Spouses with children who are caught in a poverty trap because of the marital contract entailing total separation of property. • Spouses who worked in the household or in the company of the other, without having received sufficient financial compensation for that work.
‘Cold exclusion’ • Property regimes without compensatory mechanisms: • Married couples: marital contracts with‘cold exclusion’ • Cohabitants: almost no cohabitation contracts entailing participation in income or property • Average cohabitation contract = ‘Cold exclusion’
Problems and unfair effects • Mutation average income after divorce: • Woman - 21% • Man + 33% • Mutation average income after dissolution of a cohabitation: • Woman - 14% • Man + 23%
Backlog women • Care for children • Labour market and lack of earning capacity • No participation in property
Size of the problem • 1.500 women in formal relationships with a marital agreement providing for total separation of property • 20.000 informally cohabiting women.
Causes of the problems and unfair effects • Relationship-based reduction in earning capacity • Unequal property relationships
Justification legal intervetion • Total separation of property does lead to financial problems and unfair effects • Fair and equitable regulation for the property relations governed by a marital agreement
Legal instruments • Married couples: • Better advice • Statutory compensation for unpaid work • Discretional power of the judge to amend an unfair marital contract • Cohabitants: • Extrapolation rules for spouses • Maintenance
New legislation? • Letters from the State Secretary for Safety and Justice • No new legislation • Appeal to legal practice: • Use the existing tools; develop criteria • Hidden argument: • Fear for long lasting and expensive procedures on unfair marital contracts