1 / 16

PROPOSAL FOR WORKING GROUP CONSIDERATION

From Funnel to Release Project Launch. PROPOSAL FOR WORKING GROUP CONSIDERATION. Concept. Working Group: Cross-functional consortium who are best able to establish County-wide priorities for eGIS program

bette
Download Presentation

PROPOSAL FOR WORKING GROUP CONSIDERATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. From Funnel to Release Project Launch PROPOSAL FOR WORKING GROUPCONSIDERATION

  2. Concept • Working Group: Cross-functional consortium who are best able to establish County-wide priorities for eGIS program • So, how will the priorities be established? And how will quarterly Release Projects be defined? • This presentation proposes a process for Working Group consideration

  3. Sequence Establishing the Priorities Establishing a Release Project High-level requirements are gathered on the priority requests BTS estimates work effort to implement the requests BTS estimates available work hours Working Group rationalizes the priorities, effort, and availability – to establish next quarterly Release Project BTS PMO Advisory Team Gate 1 review & approval eGIS Steering Committee review & approval • Requests for eGIS applications are submitted • Submitted requests are scored on dimensions of benefit • Scored requests are added to the Requirements Repository • Scores used to float the requests with the most benefit • Top scoring requests are reviewed by Working Group and priority order is established

  4. Establishing the Priorities

  5. Establishing a Release Project

  6. eGIS Working Group Activitiesto Define 2013 Q1 Release Content

  7. Request Submission Form (Excel)

  8. Scoring Elements & Weighting • Minimum Score = 5 • Maximum Score = 80+35+25+20+10+5 = 175 • Non-linear scoring technique creates spread

  9. Requirements Repository http://pinellas.sharepointsite.net/egis/workinggroup/Lists/eGIS%20Requirements%20Repository/

  10. Scoring & Priority Views • SharePoint Views: • Score View: Uses the Score tabulation to order the requests from highest score to lowest score • Priority View: Uses the Priority consensus of the Working Group to order the requests from highest priority to lowest priority • The Working Group may establish priorities that override numeric scoring. The scoring process only serves to narrow down the list of requests needing Working Group attention.

  11. Requirements Template

  12. Working Group Meetings Proposal: • Quarterly face-to-face meetings with (half-day) • Review / adjust go-forward priorities • Recognize new capabilities that have gone live • What’s new from Esri • Timing: Just prior to eGIS Steering Committee • Release-focused meetings as needed • Drill-down on requirements for release content • Partnering to develop hand-off capabilities in release’s stakeholder groups

  13. Approval of Working Group Release Plan • Approval requires: • Working Group’s Release content recommendation must be rationalized with effort and available resource hours • BTS PMO ATP Checklist for Gate 1 must be completed, reviewed, and approved by PMO Advisory Team • eGIS Steering Committee must review and approve

  14. APPENDIX

  15. Quarterly Release Cycle • Date-driven process • Frequent production releases • Continuous GIS platform improvement • Requires eGIS Working Group engagement

  16. SharePoint New Request Form

More Related