1 / 24

Japan Energy Update 2006

Japan Energy Update 2006. Kae Takase Governance Design Laboratory Tatsujiro Suzuki The University of Tokyo and Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI). Source: Energy Data and Modelling Center, Institute of Energy Economics, Japan. Energy Demand in Japan.

bethan
Download Presentation

Japan Energy Update 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Japan Energy Update 2006 Kae Takase Governance Design Laboratory Tatsujiro Suzuki The University of Tokyo and Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI)

  2. Source: Energy Data and Modelling Center, Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Energy Demand in Japan Japanese energy demand began to decrease, but significant growth is observed In “Commercial” and “Passenger” sector.

  3. Source: SNA statistics of Japanese government. Industrial Structure Japanese industrial structure is becoming more “service-oriented.”

  4. Source: Energy Data and Modelling Center, Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Energy Supply in Japan Coal power is taking place of Nuclear and Oil.

  5. Source: Energy Data and Modelling Center, Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Capacity Factor of Nuclear Power Plants Nuclear power had a trouble in 2003.

  6. Japan’s New National Energy Strategy (2006) • Responding to emerging global and regional energy security risks • Concern over “politicization” of global oil market • Diversified energy security risk • Applying “comprehensive energy security” approach • Set numerical targets for key policy goals by 2030 • Acceleration of Nuclear Power Programs, including Nuclear Fuel Recycling and Fast Breeder Reactor(FBR) programs

  7. Diversified, multi-polarized risks of energy security Source: New National Energy Strategy (May 2006) http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/english/data/newnationalenergystrategy2006.pdf

  8. Japan’s New National Energy Strategy (2) Basic Perspectives of “Comprehensive” Energy Security Strategy Source: New National Energy Strategy (May 2006) http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/english/data/newnationalenergystrategy2006.pdf

  9. Japan’s New National Energy Strategy (3) • Target of energy conservation • At least another 30% improvement of efficiency will be attained by 2030. • Target of reducing oil dependence • The ratio will be reduced from current 50% to be lower than 40% by 2030. • Target of reducing oil dependence in the transport sector • The percentage will be reduced from 100% to around 80% by 2030. • Development of fuel-cell car elec. Car • Target on nuclear power generation. • The ratio of nuclear power to all power production will be maintained or increased at the level of 30 to 40% or more up to 2030 or later. • Target of overseas natural resources development • Oil volume ratio will be increased from current 18% to around 40% by 2030. • Development of New energy (renewables) • RPS target: 1.35% of electricity in 2010. Source; New National Energy Strategy (May 2006) http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/english/data/newnationalenergystrategy2006.pdf

  10. Aggressive Targets of New Energy Strategy energy efficiency targets ratio of oil exploration done by Japanese companies • Source; New National Energy Strategy (May 2006) • http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/english/data/newnationalenergystrategy2006.pdf

  11. Aggressive Targets of New Energy Strategy Share of Nuclear Power in Total Power Generation Oil Dependency of Transportation Sector • Source; New National Energy Strategy (May 2006) • http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/english/data/newnationalenergystrategy2006.pdf

  12. Japan’s “Resource Diplomacy” BBC World News, August 28, 2006 “In the game of regional politics, Japan feels it has a role to play in helping offset growing Russian and Chinese influence” Col Christopher LangtonInternational Institute of Strategic Studies source: BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/5291858.stm

  13. Resource Development Strategy • Source; New National Energy Strategy (May 2006) • http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/english/data/newnationalenergystrategy2006.pdf

  14. Estimated by Governance Design Laboratory RPS target: • RPS target • 2003: 0.3% of electricity sales. • 2010: 1.35% • Over-achieved • ->banking Original target achievement Revised target

  15. Asia Energy and Environmental Cooperation Strategy • Promotion of Energy Conservation • New Energy Cooperation in Asia • Dissemination of Clean Coal Technology • Building of stockpiling system in Asia • Promotion of Nuclear Power Cooperation in Asia

  16. Energy Conservation Cooperation in Asia • Source; New National Energy Strategy (May 2006) • http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/english/data/newnationalenergystrategy2006.pdf

  17. Final Energy Consumption will decline after 2020 mil. kl of crude oil equivalent Peak:2022 (448) 2.0%/year 0.2%/year Source: METI (2004.2)

  18. Nuclear Power Plants in Japan Source: Federation of Electric Power Companies, http://www.fepc.or.jp/english/nuclear_power/generation/plants.html, April 2005

  19. Source: Energy Data and Modelling Center, Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Current and Future Capacity of Power Plants GW

  20. Nuclear Power in Japan in 2030- METI’s Long Term Outlook-June 2004 2003: 52 units (45.7GWe) High Case: +17 units(67.95 GWe) Reference: +10 units (57.98 GWe) Low Case: + 8 units (55.97 GWe) 2000 share: 34% High Case: 47% Reference: 38% Low Case: 37% Source: METI’s Advisory Committee on Energy, June 2004

  21. Source: EPA (Japan) Kyoto Target Japanese GHG emission in 2004 is 7% higher than base year, which makes 13% reduction from 2004 by 2008-2010.

  22. Source: EPA (Japan) How to achieve Kyoto target? • 2010 ref. GHG: +6% of base year. (12% reduction) • 5% reduction of energy-CO2 • 4% in forest absorption • Env.-tax or domestic ETS considered (policy renewal in 2007)

  23. LEAP Model and uncertainty • New Factors to be introduced • Uncertainty: Nuclear, Energy Conservation, and Renewables. • Certainty: • Demand decrease/not increase. • Still about 15-20% of Asia (TPE). • Relative cost of Nuclear, Conservation, and Renewables declined.

  24. Summary • Energy demand in Japan is not increasing rapidly, but still significant increase in “Commercial” and “Passenger.” • Because of unexpected accident and oil price increase, nuclear and oil supply decreased, and coal substituted those decrease. • “New National Energy Strategy” emphasizes “comprehensive energy security” • National resource development • Asia Energy and Environment cooperation • New Strategy states Japan as “Nuclear Nation” with nuclear fuel cycle and future FBRs. (30-40% of electricity) • On the other hand, RPS claims only 0.3% (2003) to 1.35%(2010) of electricity. • Kyoto target is unlikely to be achieved because major policy for energy conservation is “enlightenment.”

More Related