1 / 20

Carissa P. Sedlacek

Carissa P. Sedlacek. Manager, resource integration and analysis. Reliability Committee Meeting. Forward Capacity Auction #6 (FCA #6) Results Summary. May 15, 2012 | WESTBOROUGH, ma. Stephen J. Rourke. Vice president, system PLANNING. Highlights .

betha
Download Presentation

Carissa P. Sedlacek

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Carissa P. Sedlacek Manager, resource integration and analysis Reliability Committee Meeting Forward Capacity Auction #6 (FCA #6) Results Summary May 15, 2012 | WESTBOROUGH, ma Stephen J. Rourke Vice president, system PLANNING

  2. Highlights • The sixth Forward Capacity Auction (FCA #6) was held April 2-3 and successfully procured resources to satisfy the region’s Installed Capacity Requirement (ICR) for the 2015/2016 Capacity Commitment Period (CCP) • Approximately 38,601 MW of qualified resources competed to provide the needed 33,456 MW of capacity (Net ICR) • Of the qualified new resources, about 84% (or 2,041 MW) of new resources (generation, imports, demand resources) cleared the auction and have a Capacity Supply Obligation (CSO) • Approximately 1,889 MW of de-list bids submitted were approved. Those not approved and retained for reliability were in the NEMA/Boston load zone • A dynamic de-list bid for Vermont Yankee (604 MW) was accepted • The ISO filed results of FCA #6 with FERC on April 30

  3. FCA #6 Overview • There were seven rounds in which Participants could submit bids and offers • Starting price was $11.446/kW-mo • Ending price was $3.434/kW-mo • Cleared MW will receive a prorated payment of $3.129/kW-mo unless they elect to prorate their MW obligation • FCA #6 results FERC Filing made on April 30 is available at: • http://www.iso-ne.com/regulatory/ferc/filings/2012/apr/er12-___-000_04-30-12_6th_fca_results_filing.pdf • The resource proration election window was April 9-11 and results were provided to Participants (via MIS report) in early May • No resources in the NEMA/Boston load zone were allowed to prorate due to the fact some resources were retained for reliability

  4. FCA #6 Auction Details • ICR for June 1, 2015 through May 31, 2016 is 34,498 MW • After accounting for 1,042 MW of Hydro-Québec Installed Capacity Credits, 33,456 MW remained to be procured (Net ICR) • Approximately 38,731 MW of resources qualified to participate in FCA #6 at the time of the Informational Filing • However, due to new resource termination and/or withdrawal from Critical Path Schedule monitoring, only 38,601 MW of qualified resources actually did participate • Qualified Existing Resources (36,174 MW) • 32,076 MW of Generating Capacity, including Intermittent* • 315 MW of Import Capacity • 3,783 MW of Demand Resources • Qualified New Resources (2,427 MW) • New Supply Resources (1,953 MW) • 133 MW Generating Capacity • 1,820 MW Import Capacity • New Demand Resources (474 MW) * Includes new RTEG which receives existing treatment in the auction

  5. FCA #6 Auction Details, cont. • Approximately 617 MW (uncapped by Maximum Capacity Limit (MCL) and Real-Time Emergency Generation (RTEG)) remained at the floor price • Existing Resources (34,285 MW)* • 30,954 MW of Existing Supply Resources • 30,678 MW of Generation Capacity • 276 MW of Import Capacity • 3,331 MW of Existing Demand Resources • New Resources (2,041 MW) • New Supply Resources (1,727 MW) • 79 MW of Generation Capacity • 1,648 MW of Import Capacity** • New Demand Resources (314 MW) • Approximately 36,309 MW (capped by RTEG) total capacity was used to calculate the effective payment rate * Accounts for Non-Price Retirements and includes new RTEG ** Capped by Interface Limits

  6. New Capacity Resources by State Demand Resources* 314 MW Generation 79 MW * Includes 8% T&D Gross-up and new RTEG

  7. New Demand Resources by Type314 MW Total Includes approximately 247 MW of New Energy Efficiency Projects

  8. New Generation by Type79 MW Total

  9. Trends in New Capacity Resources

  10. FCA #6 De-list Details • A total of 191 de-list bids (approximately 1,968 MW) were received from resources in all six New England states. Approximately 96% were accepted • Permanent, static, exports and administrative export bids were submitted prior to the auction at prices greater than 0.8 X Cost of New Entry (CONE) • 10 resources submitted (approximately 351 MW) • All 351 MW were accepted • Additional static de-list bids were submitted by the ISO on behalf of the Participant due to the inability to qualify winter MW (“low winter flag”) • Submitted for 31 resources representing 122 MW (22 MW in NEMA) • All 122 MW were accepted • Dynamic de-list bids are submitted during the auction at prices less than 0.8 X CONE (or below $4.758/kW-mo) • 150 dynamic de-list bids (approximately 1,495 MW) • 1,416 MW accepted • 79 MW denied (6 dynamic de-list bids in the NEMA/Boston load zone)

  11. Approved Submitted De-list Bids by State 1,889 MW Total

  12. FCA #6 De-list Details, cont. • A dynamic de-list bid for Vermont Yankee (604 MW) was accepted for FCA #6 based on completion of various system upgrades in MA and VT that resolve identified reliability concerns • A dynamic de-list bid was also submitted in FCA #4 & 5 but the resource was retained for reliability in those auctions • De-list bid submittal trends are starting to emerge • AES Thames • Cleared a Dynamic De-list bid for the unit in FCA #5 & 6 • West Springfield 3 • Cleared a Dynamic De-list bid for the unit FCA #5 • Cleared a Static De-list bid for the unit FCA #6 • Bridgeport Harbor 2 • Cleared a Dynamic De-list bid for the unit in FCA #4, 5, & 6 • Somerset Jet 2 • Cleared a Static De-list bid for the unit in FCA #3, 4, & 5 • Cleared a Permanent De-list bid for the unit in FCA #6 • Retired effective 4/20/2012 • Somerset 6 • Cleared a Static De-list bid for the unit in FCA #1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 • Cleared a Permanent De-list bid for the unit in FCA #6 • Retired effective 4/18/2012 • Resources are also exiting the market via Annual Reconfiguration Auctions and Bilaterals

  13. Example – Real Time Emergency GenerationChange in Capacity Supply Obligations (CSOs)

  14. Resources Retained for Reliability • Few resources retained for reliability previous auctions • Norwalk Harbor Unit 1 in FCA #1 • Unit #2 was later allowed to de-list • Salem Harbor Units 3 & 4 for FCA #3, 4 and 5 • Area transmission upgrades ongoing • Restudy results for the fourth Capacity Commitment Period being discussed later today • Vermont Yankee for FCA # 4 and 5 • Area transmission upgrades ongoing • Restudy results for the fourth Capacity Commitment Period being discussed later today • These resources were retained for local reliability reasons

  15. Trends in De-list Bids Submitted 1,191 MW Rejected 581 MW Rejected 79 MW Rejected 604 MW Rejected 330 MW Rejected 0 MW Rejected

  16. Resources Retained for Reliability in FCA #6 • There were six dynamic de-list bids (79 MW) rejected • All in the NEMA/Boston load zone • Five demand resources • One partial de-list from the Kendall Steam generating facility • Restudy of these rejected de-list bids will begin this summer with the hope of allowing these resources to de-list based on changes in load forecast and other assumptions

  17. Next Steps for the Rejected De-list Bid • A presentation to the RC is expected to be made in June to discuss in detail the resources that were retained for reliability (de-list bid rejection) • In accordance with Planning Procedure No. 10, Section 7.5.1., an advisory RC vote regarding concurrence with how the analyses for the rejected De-list Bids was conducted is required and expected in June • “…The Reliability Committee shall provide formal input and advice to the ISO with regard to rejected de-list bids after the relevant FCA through an advisory vote….” • Pursuant to Market Rule 1, Section III.13.2.5.2.5.1(a)(ii), these resources will continue to be re-evaluated prior to June 1, 2014 to determine if it may be allowed to de-list

  18. Reliability Committee Meeting Forward Capacity Auction #6 (FCA #6) Results Summary – Appendix May 15, 2012 | WESTBOROUGH, ma

  19. Summary of Auction Rounds withExcess Supply and Price Changes 1capped by Import Interface Limits and MCL

  20. Results of New England’s FCA #6 Effective Payment Rate ($/kW-Mo): $3.129 RTEG: $3.044 Price at beginning of auction: $11.446/kW-Mo (2 X CONE) Need in 2015 (NICR):33,456 MW Price at end of auction: $3.434/kW-Mo (Floor price: 0.6 X CONE) Resources Capped by RTEG 36,309 MW Qualified Resources Entering the Auction: 38,601 MW Excess Capacity: 2,853 MW (Total cleared minus net ICR capped by RTEG) Resources cleared (uncapped) in the auction at the floor price: 36,326 MW Generating Resources: 30,757 MW Cleared Imports: 1,924 MW Demand Resources: 3,645 MW New Resources: 2,427 MW New: 79 MW Existing Resources: 36,174 MW Existing: 30,678 MW Existing: 276 MW New: 1,648 MW MW from existing resources requestingto de-list 1,968 MW Existing: 3,331 MW New: 314 MW Demand: 3,783 MW Demand: 474 MW Capacity Zones: One No Price Separation Generating: 32,076 MW Generating: 133 MW Rejected: 79 MW Approved: 1,889 MW Imports: 315 MW Imports: 1,820 MW Generating: 1,398 MW Import: 39 MW Demand: 452 MW

More Related