1 / 16

BCB 322: Landscape Ecology

BCB 322: Landscape Ecology. Lecture 5: Emerging processes II Fragmentation & connectivity. Introduction. A core issue for modern conservation planning & landscape ecology (Saunders et al , 1991) Has been identified as one of the biggest challenges to biodiversity

berthelot
Download Presentation

BCB 322: Landscape Ecology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BCB 322:Landscape Ecology Lecture 5: Emerging processes II Fragmentation & connectivity

  2. Introduction • A core issue for modern conservation planning & landscape ecology (Saunders et al, 1991) • Has been identified as one of the biggest challenges to biodiversity • Proceeds extremely rapidly – in large parts of the world almost all fragmentation occurred in the last century (Australia, Amazonia) • Negative impact on many species due to geographical isolation and sundering of metapopulation communication • Interior species affected more than others Deforestation & development, Tanzania

  3. Introduction • Large predators die out first, causing population overruns of other species • These species may then cause further degradation • (eg): removal of the top predator in Zimbabwean national parks (man) led to overpopulation and habitat trashing by elephants • Although island biogeography is used to describe them, fragments are not true islands. • Connectivity & ecotones must also be considered when studying landscape fragmentation • In fact, since all landscapes are inherently patchy, fragmentation may be considered as filling a continuum from untouched wilderness to fully- fragmented • Fragmentation is scale specific for different organisms

  4. Scale dependence • If a large area is fragmented into smaller intact areas, it is termed “geographical fragmentation” (coarse-grained) Wiens, 1994 • Fragmentation on the scale of plots is extremely fine-grained (eg): native vegetation in a matrix of invaders • Effects tend to be species-specific due to scale & resource considerations • Specialists are generally worse affected by fine grain fragmentation than generalists • Fragments tend to be more vulnerable to external disturbance (wind, drought, disease)

  5. Diversity in fragments • Species assemblages in fragments are usually subsets of those of larger plots • Species assemblages in smaller woodlots tend to be lower than in large ones • Fragmentation method, habitat type and surrounding matrix effect all play a role in the effect of fragmentation on species • Temperate forest birds show high resilience to fragmentation into woodlots • Tropical deforestation immediately reduces biodiversity, and separations of as little as 80m can act as barriers for insects, small mammals & understorey birds • Burning in Chilean forests promotes the growth of Vismia around remnants, whilst logging does not. Remnants surrounded by this species are considered more isolated by birds (Stouffer & Bieregaard, 1995)

  6. Fragmentation: species response • Some species suffer more from fragmentation due to habitat size sensitivity (large predators & interior species) • Eg: amphipods in Australian eucalyptus forest showed marked reductions in populations after fragmentation (Margules et al, 1994) • By contrast, scorpions showed no significant change in the same plots, possibly because it is capable of fossorial behaviour. • Small beetles often consider fairly small open spaces to be impassable due to increased risk of dessication • Conservation responses should therefore look at individual species responses and not just α-diversity

  7. Fragmentation: species responses • Forest tent caterpillar (Malacostoma disstria) outbreak durations are related to the extent of forest edge/km: parasites & predators are less efficient at the edges (Roland, 1993) • In a study by Kattan et al (1994), showed that between 1959 & 1990, 31% of avifauna in the upland forest of Colombia were eliminated Roland, 1993 • Species that fed in the understorey, and those that required large canopies for fruit provision were hit worse than other species. • Clearly, the effect of fragmentation depends on the biogeography of the species in question

  8. Fragmentation & predation Wilcove, 1985 • Species in fragments are often more vulnerable to predation (Wilcove, 1985) • Many other factors affect predation rates at the local level, including vegetation type & cover of the surrounding matrix, • In a fragmentation gradient in Southwestern California, avian nest predators were found to increase with fragmentation, whilst snakes decreased. • Hence, primarily snake-predated species were less impacted by predators in fragments than other species (Patten & Bolger, 2003) http://www.rfadventures.com/images/Animals/Reptiles/Snakes/Non%20Ven/

  9. Fragmentation measurement • There are many measures useable for fragmentation, and often severable variables must be combined by regression • Area (& ratios of area: long axis length; area: perimeter) • Structure • Isolation • Surrounding land use • Edges (external & internal) per km • Species turnover in a fragment is calculated as: where E= extinctions C = colonisations S1 & S2 = # breeding species in years 1 & 2 (Diamond, 1969) • Turnover is inversely related to area, with plots over a certain size having a constant turnover rate.

  10. Connectedness • Isolation obviously causes problems for species movement. • Three measures of patch isolation can be considered: • connectedness: the degree of physical connection between patches (structural attribute). Obviously, the matrix is the most connected element, but generally connectedness is a measure of the patch structure • connectivity: extent to which subpopulations are connected into a functional demographic unit (functional attribute). • corridors: functional or structural connection between different subpopulation.

  11. Connectivity Farina,1998

  12. Corridors • Functional structures in a landscape which are fundamental for mitigation of the effects of fragmentation (also for invasive species penetration) • Important concept for conservation planning, to allow movement of organisms through the reserve and surrounds • Consequently, they may be structurally recognisable (such as hedgerows in a field matrix), but are not necessarily so • In fact, there’s little evidence that animals use hedgerows/fencelines as corridors • Many plant species soil conditions for growth & seed conditions that are not guaranteed by a narrow strip of vegetation • Hence, “corridor” is an unclear concept, and is used in different contexts in different places in the literature.

  13. Corridors • Can be created by topography (mountain ridges), hydrology (riverbeds) or human forest clearance and other disturbances • Rivers are the best studied corridor structures – often associated with alien invasion due to the patchiness of the riparian structure • Patchiness due to flooding, temporary ponds, seasonal dryness. • Invasibility differs according to hyrdological & geomorphological zones in the river • Furthermore, alien plant invasion can be mitigated due to high seasonal variation www.in.gov/dnr/public/novdec02/corridor.jpg

  14. Corridors http://www.dsbn.edu.on.ca/Schools/MarthaC/cougar%2082.jpg • Vital for large home range mammals in human-impacted landscapes (eg: cougar - Felix concolor – can travel up to 5 miles/night (Beier, 1993) • Satellite telemetry is useful for measuring ranges of such species • Telemetry measurements of leatherback turtles showed they followed the same route every year to beaches on Costa Rica (Morreale et al, 1996) • In fact, it appears many species follow “marine corridors” & without testing, these can easily be disrupted by human activity such as fishing • Corridor width plays a role in the viability of a corridor – too narrow and dispersal capacity is limited

  15. Summary • Fragmentation is a global process that reduces biodiversity & accelerates local & global extinctions • Fragmentation increases habitat edges and the potential for predation • Fragmentation is a species specific measure, and although one species may see the environment as fragmented, it may be homogeneous for another • Animal dispersion/movements increase with fragmentation • Connectivity is a functional measure of fragmentation • Connectedness is the structural corollary to connectivity • Corridors are essential for the maintenance of biodiversity in a fragmented landscape, although definitions of corridors vary

  16. References • Diamond, J.M. (1969) Avifaunal equilibria and species turnover rates on the Channel Islands of California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA69:3199-3203 • Farina, A. (1998) Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London, UK • Kattan, G.H., Alvarez-Lopez & H., Giraldo, M.(1994) Forest fragment and bird extinctions: San Antonio eighty years later. Conservation Biology8: 138-146 • Margules, C.R., Gaston, A.J. & Hitier, S. (1994) Contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation on the scorpion Cercophonius squama and an amphipod.Ecology75: 2033-2042 • Patten, M. A. and Bolger, D. T. 2003. Variation in top-down control of avian reproductive success across a fragmentation gradient. – Oikos 101: 479–488. • Roland, J. (1993) Large-scale forest fragmentation increases the duration of tent caterpillar outbreak. Oecologia93: 25-30 • Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. & Margules, C.R. (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18-32 • Stouffer, P.C. & Bierregaard, R.O. (1995) Use of amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology76: 2429-2445 • Wiens, J.A. (1994) Habitat fragmentation: island v landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis137: S97-S104 • Wilcove, D.S. (1985) Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology66:1211-1214

More Related