1 / 18

Lessons learned running non US/North American conferences

Lessons learned running non US/North American conferences. By Patrick Le Dû France (CEA and IN2P3/CNRS) patrickledu@free.fr. NPSS ADCOM member as Transnational Conference Liaison General Chair - RTC Beaune 1997 - NSS-MIC Lyon 2000. Menu. Goals of this presentation.

Download Presentation

Lessons learned running non US/North American conferences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lessons learned running non US/North American conferences By Patrick Le Dû France (CEA and IN2P3/CNRS) patrickledu@free.fr NPSS ADCOM member as Transnational Conference Liaison General Chair - RTC Beaune 1997 - NSS-MIC Lyon 2000 COPO08- SEATTLE

  2. Menu Goals of this presentation • Show the NPSS conference experiences • outside North America • Lessons from Europe • The Asian challenge COPO08- SEATTLE

  3. NPSS conference survey COPO08- SEATTLE

  4. Real Time Conference features • NPSS strategy was starting with a moderate size conference (150-200) • Learning process ! • Very specific community of fundamental research scientific Engineers & Physicists close to experimental facilities around particle accelerators (CERN,DESY,SLAC,FNAL) • Now attracting other fields (ITER, Medical Imaging..) • Participants • Coming from High Energy Physics : 50 - 60% • Already large European > 60% • Regular attendance is high : 60-70% COPO08- SEATTLE

  5. RTC survey Next 2009 Beijing China 2011 Lisbon/Porto Portugal Beaune France Stockholm Sweeden COPO08- SEATTLE

  6. RTC experience • Beaune 97 - the first experience • Congress center based + outside hotels • Full logistic support and sponsorship of the french Scientific research Institutions (CEA & CNRS/IN2P3) : • Financial contribution from France • Plus a lot of ‘in kind’ contribution • First lesson • Great success ! • Difficult to justify a ‘surplus’ to our authorities • We were starting to build a « support team » • Stockholm (2005) • Alba Nova University based and support • A full NPSS compliant organization COPO08- SEATTLE

  7. Feed back Evaluation from particpants COPO08- SEATTLE

  8. Conclusion RTC & next challenge • Very succesfull conferences • Some accidents rapidly corrected (Valencia 2001) • Routine to go regularly (2/3) outside North america • We have a stable ‘organization team’ and management structure • Not to ‘reinvent the wheel’ everytime • Discover young talents • Next challenge ---> ASIA! • RT 2009 in China (Beijing IHEP) COPO08- SEATTLE

  9. RTC 2009 Beijing organization Conference Chairs Yifang Wang (General Chair) IHEP, China Yantai Shu (Co-Chair) Tianjin University, China Executive Committe Chair J.P. Martin Former and future Chairs Plus Asian Chairs including Japan (Masa Nomachi) Local Organizing Committee (11p) Chair Zhen’An Liu(IHEP) Scientific Program Advisory Committee ( CANPS + ..) Chair: Stefan Ritt (Abstract evaluation , paper selection and session chairs) Asian-Pacific Contact, Promotion and Support Benjamin M.W. Tsui Ren-Yuan Zhu And many others …. NPSS Advisory and Support Group TNS editor (Sacha Schmeling) Conference promotion (CIP) COPO08- SEATTLE

  10. First ‘overseas’ NSS-MIC conference Initiated by W. Moses, G. Knoll, E. Lampo,E. Heijne in 1997 Fully supported by all RITC and ADCOM members A ‘challenge’  with some ’experimental ’new flavors Another logistic : a Palais des Congres separated from hotels New organization of the scientific program  convenors Overview talks (NSS + MIC) Technical seminar for exhibitors Satellite workshops (Technology Transfer) Public exhibition ( Hadrontherapy) Extensive promotion : poster, centralized databases (email, web) Goals Improve interdisciplinary relationship (NSS and MIC) Attract new participants/students including ‘former east countries’ Build a team of young motivated european ‘conference support team’  initiation of Conference Information Promotion (CIP) LYON 2000 NSS-MIC summary Make NSS-MIC more ‘international’ COPO08- SEATTLE

  11. NSS-MIC Lyon 2000 P a r t i c i p a n t s N o r h A m e r i c a E u r o p e T o r o n t o A s i e , A u s t r a l i e L y o n R u s s i e e t a l . D i v e r s 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 M e m b e r s 2 0 0 N o n 0 m e m b e r s 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 • Total registered participants = 1250 (+ 65%) • Conference staff = 30, Exhibitor staff= 70 • Conference participants = 1130 (NSS=52%,MIC=47%) • Exhibitors: 55(+83%) • Short courses : 312(+100%) • Social programme • Receptions = 1000(+100%) • NSS banquet = 450(+80%) • MIC dinner = 450 (+80%) COPO08- SEATTLE

  12. Evaluation questionnaire results Excellent Very good Good Satisfact.. Poor Overall 15 36 31 14* 4* >GOOD= 82% Site 32 33 19 9* 7* *Hotel too far Registration 30 24 21 15 10 Secretariat 26 26 32 9 9 Plenary sessions 23 33 37 5 2 Overview sessions 22 40 31 6 1 Parallel sessions 7 42 29 16* 6 *Too many Small rooms Poster sessions 10 30 24 18* 18* Not enough space Industrial exhibit 20 39 32 7 2 Coffee breaks 28 37 22 9 4 NSS banquet 35 33 19 9 4 MIC Dinner 52 32 16 0 0 Social program 33 23 17 16 11 Travel connections 10 20 38 20* 12* Accomodation 10 18 35 12* 25* *Hotel far from site COPO08- SEATTLE

  13. Lyon 2000 Analysis and Lessons • A real breakthrough ! • This is NOT a copy past of North American conferences (big hotels are very limited!) • Some promized ‘european’ grants never came ! • Conflict between ‘supported non profit’ conferences and others!… • VAT issues --> unclear at that time • Unforeseen expenses due to unexected attendance ! : • logging problems : transportation, food and dinners, • To be adapted and improved  recurrent over many conferences! • Hotel availability, long term booking and management! • Service companies COPO08- SEATTLE

  14. Dresden 2008 Valencia 2011 LYON 2000 Roma 2004 COPO08- SEATTLE

  15. Conclusion from Europe experience • A ‘great’ and enthousiastic experience • We have a BIG ‘international’ instrumentation conference (> 2000) • Europe is attractive & become a routine  2004 (Roma)  2008 Dresden ---> 2011 Valencia Today it is a place where it can be really international!  new european countries …. but also others with US visa limitation • However some points to be ‘noticed’! • European conferences has their ‘own’ rules and features • Need close link with local institutions & national labs • ( CEA/CNRS, INFN, DESY/FZD …..) • Future: need better EU support & link •  to be look at very seriously ! • Look more complex to organize • Congress centers & hotels are separated • not a ‘copy past’ from year to year ! • Taxes (VAT) is not simple to manage uniformly • Currency exchange rate unstable! • $ vs €  0.9 in 2000  1.60 now! COPO08- SEATTLE

  16. Next: The Asian Challenge & Strategy • Asia is already our next ‘target’ after Europe … • How to make it ‘smoothly’ ? • New world, new culture: we have to learn • Strategy: start to get a first experience with a ‘small conference ‘ like we did succefully for Europe: • RTC Beaune 97 • NSS-MIC 2000 in Lyon …..then …. ‘almost routine!’ • RTC 2009 will be in Beijing -IHEP next May • We visited IHEP,Tianjin University and IEEE Beijing office • All administrative work as been done (Licence) • Investigating NSS-MIC in Asia for 2013-14 • China is not the only Asian/Pacific possiblity (Japan ,India ..…) COPO08- SEATTLE

  17. My first comments about China • With RT organization and visit we already learn a lot • Mainland China is a great opportunity for us • Chinese culture is different from our! • We have to be very carefull to avoid dramatic frustration • The centralized ‘administration’ is already there (for us the Chinese academy of Sciences ) which make all decisions (Conference licence …) • Everything should be approved by them ! • We cannot organize a conference as ‘standard’ US or even European… • Experience of RT (organization,budget,hotels …) is a unique opportunity to learn and gain experience before to go ahead to a bigger one. COPO08- SEATTLE

  18. Conclusion & summary • Europe is becoming a routine • Asia is our next great opportunity • Cannot be a ‘copy -past’ of US conference • The knowledge of the local country and administration is fundamental • VAT cannot be uniformly apply • Please bannish the term ‘surplus’ in the budget --> ‘administrative fees’ Thanks a lot for your attention and your invitation ! COPO08- SEATTLE

More Related