Getting Started as a New Investigator - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Getting started as a new investigator l.jpg
Download
1 / 45

Getting Started as a New Investigator Anthony Carter, Ph.D. Program Director NIGMS/NIH/DHHS CarterA@nigms.nih.gov April 27, 2009 Who is a New Investigator? Has not previously served as PI on any PHS grant Exceptions: R00, R03, R15, R21 or mentored K awards

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Getting Started as a New Investigator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Getting started as a new investigator l.jpg

Getting Started as a New Investigator

Anthony Carter, Ph.D.

Program Director

NIGMS/NIH/DHHS

CarterA@nigms.nih.gov

April 27, 2009


Who is a new investigator l.jpg

Who is a New Investigator?

  • Has not previously served as PI on any PHS grant

    • Exceptions: R00, R03, R15, R21 or mentored K awards

  • Recipient of Independent Scientist or other non-mentored career award is not new investigator

    grants.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/index.htm


Early stage investigators esi new for 2009 not od 09 021 l.jpg

Early Stage Investigators (ESI)New for 2009 NOT-OD-09-021

  • Meets definition of New Investigator

  • Within 10 years of completion of terminal research degree or medical residency

  • Must update eRA Commons profile

    Extension of ESI Status can be considered when there has been a lapse in research or research training


Good grantsmanship like research involves teamwork l.jpg

Good Grantsmanship, like research, involves teamwork

  • Investigators conducting the research

  • Officials at your home institution

  • NIH staff


Good grantsmanship requires good preparation l.jpg

Good Grantsmanship requires good preparation

At your home institution

  • Refine your thinking with your mentor(s)

  • Get outside opinions as you proceed

    • Seek a critical evaluation

  • Show draft a colleague outside your field

    • He/she should understand what you intend

    • If not, reviewers may not understand either

  • Leave enough time to revise your draft!


Some homework before con tacting nih staff l.jpg

Some Homework before Contacting NIH Staff

  • Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool (RePORT) report.nih.gov/index.aspx

  • Check NIH Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP) crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/crisp_query.generate_screen

  • Check NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts

    grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html

  • Check web information for the relevant Institute or Center – e.g. www.nigms.nih.gov/

  • Identify Appropriate Staff Contacts – e.g. “About NIGMS”


Research portfolio online reporting tool report report nih gov index aspx l.jpg

Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool (RePORT) report.nih.gov/index.aspx


Crisp crisp cit nih gov crisp crisp query generate screen l.jpg

CRISP crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp/crisp_query.generate_screen

  • Searchable database of federally supported biomedical research

  • Analyze current Institute portfolio

    • Areas with few funded projects

    • Research areas already well funded

  • Locate experienced NIH funded investigators in your area of interest

    • Potential mentors/collaborators

  • Due to be replaced by RePORTER in 2009


Coming in 2009 report expenditures and results reporter system l.jpg

Coming in 2009RePORT Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) system


Nih guide for grants and contracts l.jpg

NIH GUIDE for Grants and Contracts

  • Official notification of NIH policies, notices and availability of funds

  • Contains all PAs, RFAs, RFPs and other solicitations

    grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html

  • Sign up on-line to receive weekly NIH Guide publication


Identifying staff contacts about nigms l.jpg

Identifying Staff Contacts – About NIGMS


The nih extramural team l.jpg

The NIH Extramural Team

Grants

Management

Review

Program


When preparing an application the program officer is an important contact l.jpg

When Preparing an Application the Program Officer is an Important Contact

  • Call early … and often!

  • Helps to match your scientific interests with mission of NIH Institute

  • Can provide information about special initiatives

  • Suggests appropriate grant mechanism(s)

  • Provides guidance in application preparation

  • Helps to navigate peer review process


First contact with the program officer l.jpg

First Contact with the Program Officer

  • Scientific meetings

  • E-mail

    • Draft of abstract or specific aims

    • Phone number

    • Biosketch, if applying for F32 or K award

  • Telephone


Typical questions for the program officer l.jpg

Typical Questions for the Program Officer

  • Is my project appropriate for your Institute?

  • Is my project appropriate for this PA (or RFA)?

  • Do you accept small grant (R03 or R21) applications?

  • Should I ask for a dual assignment?

  • What is your payline?


I do not have much preliminary data l.jpg

“I do not have much preliminary data.”

Should I start with a small grant and work up to an R01?


Research career development timetable l.jpg

Research Career Development Timetable

Career Stage

Support Mechanism

GRADUATE/

MEDICAL

STUDENT

Predoctoral Training Awards: F30, F31, T32

Postdoctoral Training Awards: F32, T32

POST

DOCTORAL

Mentored Career Development Awards:

K01, K08, K22, K23, K25, K99/R00

Small Grant: R03

EARLY

Exploratory/Developmental Grant: R21

New Innovator Award: DP2

Research Project Grant: R01, EUREKA, R15

CAREER

Independent Scientist Award: K02

MIDDLE

Midcareer Investigator Awards: K24, K26

Pioneer Award: DP1

SENIOR

Senior Scientist Award: K05


Nih mechanisms of special interest to new investigators l.jpg

NIH Mechanisms of Special Interest to New Investigators

  • K awards (K01, K08, K22, K23, K25,K99/R00)

  • Small grant (R03)

  • Exploratory/developmental grant (R21)

  • Academic Research Enhancement Award (R15)

  • NIH Director’s New Innovator Award (DP2)

  • Researchproject grant (R01)


Mentored career development awards mk l.jpg

Mentored Career Development Awards (mK)

  • K01 Mentored Research Scientist Development

  • K08 Mentored Clinical Scientist Development

  • K22 Research Career Award for Transition to Independence

  • K23 Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Development

  • K25 Mentored Quantitative Research Development

  • K99/R00 Pathway to Independence

    grants.nih.gov/training/careerdevelopmentawards.htm


Small research grant program r03 l.jpg

Small Research Grant Program (R03)

  • Support for small research projects

  • Up to 2 years and $50K per year

  • Not all ICs support this mechanism

  • PA-06-180

    grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-06-180.html

    grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r03.htm


Exploratory developmental research grant r21 l.jpg

Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant (R21)

  • Foster the introduction of novel scientific ideas, model systems, tools, agents, targets, and technologies

  • Break new ground or extend previous discoveries toward new directions or applications

  • Up to 2 years and $275K total direct costs

  • PA 06-181

    grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-06-181.html

    grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r21.htm


Academic research enhancement award r15 l.jpg

Academic Research Enhancement Award (R15)

  • Small-scale health-related research projects at eligible domestic institutions

  • $150K total direct costs for up to 3 years

  • PA 06-042

    grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-06-042.html

    grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/area.htm

    Recovery Act Limited Competition: Academic Research Enhancement Award (R15) grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OD-09-007.html


Nih director s new innovator award dp2 l.jpg

NIH Director’s New Innovator Award (DP2)

  • New investigators of exceptional creativity

  • Bold and highly innovative new research approaches

  • Up to $300,000/yr for 5 years

    grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-09-013.html#PartI

    grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-09-003.html

    Reissued yearly


I am not quite ready for an r01 but i can not find an appropriate grant at nih l.jpg

“I am not quite ready for an R01, but I can not find an appropriate grant at NIH.”

Do not overlook support from other agencies

  • Federal agencies – e.g. NSF

  • State and Local sources

  • Private foundations


When the application is received by the center for scientific review l.jpg

When the Application is Received by the Center for Scientific Review

The application

  • Receives an Institute/Center (IC) assignment

    • You can make suggestions

  • Receives a Study Section assignment

    • You can make suggestions


From receipt of the application until the review is completed l.jpg

From receipt of the application until the review is completed

The Scientific Review Officer (SRO) is an important contact.

  • Manages the peer review process

  • Checks applications for completeness

  • Analyzes content

  • Recruits and assigns reviewers

  • Provides technical advice to applicant

    -- beforethe review


First contact with the scientific review officer l.jpg

First Contact with the Scientific Review Officer

  • Scientific meetings

  • E-mail

    • Draft of abstract or specific aims

    • Phone number

    • Biosketch, if applying for F32 or K award

  • Telephone


Address questions about the review process to the sro l.jpg

Address Questions About the Review Process to the SRO

  • What scientific areas are covered by the study section?

  • What expertise is on the study section?

  • May I ask for a specific study section?

  • What happens if I have a conflict with someone on the study section?

  • May I submit an update after the application is submitted?


Slide29 l.jpg

Are New Investigators given special consideration during the review?


General considerations when reviewing new investigator r01s l.jpg

General Considerations when Reviewing New Investigator R01s

  • Keep in mind the experience of PI and resources available

  • More emphasis on demonstrating feasibility than on preliminary data

  • More emphasis on training and potential of PI

  • Evaluate evidence of institutional commitment


Grant application tips for new investigators grants nih gov grants grant tips htm l.jpg

Grant Application Tips for New Investigators grants.nih.gov/grants/grant_tips.htm


What makes a great idea l.jpg

What Makes a Great Idea?

  • Does it address an important problem?

  • Will scientific knowledge be advanced? Will this work drive the field forward?

  • And especially for new investigators …

    … Is it feasible for you to do?

  • Engage collaborators that complement your expertise and training


Good presentation l.jpg

Good Presentation

  • Provide a well-focused research plan

  • Keep specific aims simple

  • Link hypotheses to specific aims

  • Link methods to each specific aim

  • Stay on the main theme

  • Use timelines and conceptual models


Good presentation34 l.jpg

Good Presentation

  • Be realistic … not overly ambitious

  • Be self-critical. Discuss potential problems

  • Discuss alternative interpretations and possible solutions

    • Explain rationale for your decisions

  • Reviewers cannot read your mind …

    Don’t assume they know what you intend


Coming summer 2009 enhanced peer review l.jpg

Coming Summer 2009Enhanced Peer Review

  • 9 point scale scoring system

  • Scores for each criterion

  • Enhanced review criteria

  • Formatted reviewer critiques

  • Percentile rankings will be calculated new

  • Preliminary impact score will determine which applications are discussed

  • Clustering of New Investigator applications during review


New 2009 reviewer critique template l.jpg

New 2009 Reviewer Critique Template

Application #: 1R01HL123456-01

Principal Investigator(s): Doe, Jane

Overall Impact

Scored Review Criteria

Additional Review Criteria

The following review criteria are not scored individually, but should be considered when determining the overall impact/priority score


After the study section review l.jpg

After the Study Section Review ...

  • Priority score/percentile within 3 working days – available through eRA Commons

  • SRA prepares the Summary Statement

  • National Advisory Council review

  • Final funding decisions


After the study section review things you can do before council l.jpg

After the Study Section Review ...things you can do before Council

  • Wait for the Summary Statement

  • Read the Summary Statement carefully

  • Contact the program officer with questions about the review of your specific application


Am i likely to be funded should i revise and resubmit l.jpg

“Am I likely to be funded?”“Should I revise and resubmit?”

Contact your program officer

  • May provide additional insights regarding the discussion at the study section

  • Discusses summary statement

    • Understanding the written reviews

    • Responding to reviewer concerns

    • Revising and resubmitting


Shortened review cycle for new investigators l.jpg

Shortened Review Cycle for New Investigators

grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-083.html


Are new investigators given special consideration in funding decisions l.jpg

Are New Investigators given special consideration in funding decisions?

NHLBI, as an example:

  • Separate payline for ESI and New PIs that is 5 percentile points above the regular RPG payline (FY 2009)

  • ESI applications >5 but ≤10 percentile points above the regular R01 payline may undergo an expedited review to resolve comments in the summary statement

  • Funds new investigators for all years recommended

  • Separate payline for ESI first renewal applications that are 5 percentile points above the regular RPG payline (FY 2009)

    nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/training/redbook/newinvest.htm


Are new investigators given special consideration in funding decisions42 l.jpg

Are New Investigators given special consideration in funding decisions?

NIGMS, as an example:

  • New Investigator status is a criterion for funding decisions

  • Staff are encouraged to identify and give special consideration

  • R01 grants can be awarded for 5 years (instead of 4)

    grants.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/institute_center_practices.htm


If funding seems likely l.jpg

If funding seems likely

  • Just-in-Time information

  • Human subjects

  • Animal welfare

  • Budget

  • Administrative requirements

Consult with program officer and/or grants management officer on key issues:


Grants management officer l.jpg

Grants Management Officer

  • Only NIH official authorized to obligate funds or establish terms and conditions of award

  • Assures that applications meet all administrative requirements prior to award

  • Assures compliance with Federal laws and NIH policies and procedures

  • Reviews and responds to grantee requests that require prior approval

  • Responsible for official grant files


  • Login